TL;DR: This paper addresses the more challenging problem of the strict self-assembly of discrete Sierpinski triangles, i.e., the task of tiling a discrete SIERpinski triangle and nothing else, and proves that the standard discrete Siersiak triangle cannotstrictly self-assemble in the Tile Assembly Model.
Abstract: Winfree (1998) showed that discrete Sierpinski triangles can self-assemble in the Tile Assembly Model. A striking molecular realization of this self-assembly, using DNA tiles a few nanometers long and verifying the results by atomic-force microscopy, was achieved by Rothemund, Papadakis, and Winfree (2004).
Precisely speaking, the above self-assemblies tile completely filled-in, two-dimensional regions of the plane, with labeled subsets of these tiles representing discrete Sierpinski triangles. This paper addresses the more challenging problem of the strict self-assemblyof discrete Sierpinski triangles, i.e., the task of tiling a discrete Sierpinski triangle and nothing else.
We first prove that the standard discrete Sierpinski triangle cannotstrictly self-assemble in the Tile Assembly Model. We then define the fibered Sierpinski triangle, a discrete Sierpinski triangle with the same fractal dimension as the standard one but with thin fibers that can carry data, and show that the fibered Sierpinski triangle strictly self-assembles in the Tile Assembly Model. In contrast with the simple XOR algorithm of the earlier, non-strict self-assemblies, our strict self-assembly algorithm makes extensive, recursive use of Winfree counters, coupled with measured delay and corner-turning operations. We verify our strict self-assembly using the local determinism method of Soloveichik and Winfree (2005).
TL;DR: A checkerboard is an example of a sinilarity tiling, one that is composed of smaller tiles of the same size, each having the same shape as the whole.
Abstract: Tilings have appeared in human activity since prehistoric times. They are used in the design of floor and wall coverings for cathedrals, commercial buildings, and personal dwellings. Mathematicians stucly the geometric structure of tilings. A checkerboard is an elementary example of a sinilarity tiling, one that is composed of smaller tiles (,rep tiles) of the same size, each having the same shape as the whole. Each rep tile in the checkerboard is the scaled and translated image of the entire board. For the checkerboard in FIGURE la, the lower left tile is the image of the checkerboard under
TL;DR: The Sierpinski pedal triangle as mentioned in this paper is a two-parameter family of fractals that can be obtained from a given triangle by recursively deleting the associated pedal triangles.
Abstract: We generalize the construction of the ordinary Sierpinski triangle to obtain a two-parameter family of fractals we call Sierpinski pedal triangles. These fractals are obtained from a given triangle by recursively deleting the associated pedal triangles in a manner analogous to the construction of the ordinary Sierpinski triangle, but their fractal dimensions depend on the choice of the initial triangles. In this paper, we discuss the fractal dimensions of the Sierpinski pedal triangles and the related area ratio problem, and provide some computer-generated graphs of the fractals.
TL;DR: In this paper, the Sierpinski triangle is evident in Pascal's triangle mod 2 whose inverse, as an infinite lower-triangular matrix, involves the Prouhet-Thue-Morse word.
Abstract: Sierpinski's triangle is a fractal and the Prouhet-Thue-Morse word is sufficiently chaotic to avoid cubes Here we observe that there is at least a tenuous connection between them: the Sierpinski triangle is evident in Pascal's triangle mod 2 whose inverse, as an infinite lower-triangular matrix, involves the Prouhet-Thue-Morse word