About: Recursive definition is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 364 publications have been published within this topic receiving 6548 citations. The topic is also known as: inductive definition.
TL;DR: It is shown that the general case of the Entscheidungsproblem is unsolvable in any system of symbolic logic which is adequate to a certain portion of arithmetic and is ω-consistent.
Abstract: In a recent paper the author has proposed a definition of the commonly used term “effectively calculable” and has shown on the basis of this definition that the general case of the Entscheidungsproblem is unsolvable in any system of symbolic logic which is adequate to a certain portion of arithmetic and is ω-consistent. The purpose of the present note is to outline an extension of this result to the engere Funktionenkalkul of Hilbert and Ackermann.In the author's cited paper it is pointed out that there can be associated recursively with every well-formed formula a recursive enumeration of the formulas into which it is convertible. This means the existence of a recursively defined function a of two positive integers such that, if y is the Godel representation of a well-formed formula Y then a(x, y) is the Godel representation of the xth formula in the enumeration of the formulas into which Y is convertible.Consider the system L of symbolic logic which arises from the engere Funktionenkalkul by adding to it: as additional undefined symbols, a symbol 1 for the number 1 (regarded as an individual), a symbol = for the propositional function = (equality of individuals), a symbol s for the arithmetic function x+1, a symbol a for the arithmetic function a described in the preceding paragraph, and symbols b1, b2, …, bk for the auxiliary arithmetic functions which are employed in the recursive definition of a; and as additional axioms, the recursion equations for the functions a, b1, b2, …, bk (expressed with free individual variables, the class of individuals being taken as identical with the class of positive integers), and two axioms of equality, x = x, and x = y →[F(x)→F(y)].
TL;DR: There are two main purposes in this paper, clarification and extension of known results about computation of recursive programs, with emphasis on the difference between the theoretical and practical approaches.
Abstract: There are two main purposes in this paper: first, clarification and extension of known results about computation of recursive programs, with emphasis on the difference between the theoretical and practical approaches; second, presentation and examination of various known methods for proving properties of recursive programs. Discussed in detail are two powerful inductive methods, computational induction and structural induction, including examples of their applications.
TL;DR: In this paper, the sentences "You may take an apple, or take a pear" and "You might take a pearl, or not" were considered, and the sentences were analyzed.
Abstract: Consider the sentences
(1)
You may take an apple,
(2)
You may take a pear, and
(3)
You may take an apple or take a pear.