TL;DR: In this paper, the authors report acute toxicity and evaluate the relationship between dose-volume effects and acute toxicity in patients with localized prostate cancer, treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT).
Abstract: Purpose: To report acute toxicity and to evaluate the relationship between dose–volume effects and acute toxicity in patients with localized prostate cancer, treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). Methods and Materials: Acute toxicity (both lower gastrointestinal [GI] and genito-urinary [GU]) in 100 patients treated with IMRT definitively to a prescribed dose of 70 Gy were assessed using RTOG scoring criteria. A rectal balloon was used for prostate immobilization. Mean doses to seminal vesicles, prostate, bladder, and rectum were recorded. Average irradiated bladder and rectal volumes above 65, 70, and 75 Gy were assessed. A relationship between dose volume and clinical toxicity was evaluated. All patients completed the full duration of acute toxicity assessment. Results: Mean doses to the prostate and seminal vesicles were 75.8 and 73.9 Gy. This represents a moderate dose escalation. Acute GI toxicity profile was very favorable. Eleven percent and 6% of the patients had grade 1 and 2 GI toxicity, respectively, while 83% had no GI complaint. For GU complaints, 38% and 35% had grade 1 and 2 toxicity, respectively, while 27% had no complaints. There was no grade 3 or higher acute GI or GU toxicity. Mean doses to the bladder were 22.8, 23.4, and 26.1 Gy for grade 0, 1, and 2 GU toxicity, respectively ( p = 0.132). There is no statistically significant relationship between acute GU toxicity and the bladder volume receiving > 65 Gy, > 70 Gy, or > 75 Gy. In evaluating acute GI toxicity, there are very few grade 1 and 2 events. No relationship was found between acute rectal toxicity and mean rectal dose or irradiated rectal volumes receiving more than 65, 70, and 75 Gy. Conclusion: The findings are important with regard to the safety of IMRT, especially in reducing acute GI toxicity. Dose escalation with IMRT using a prostate immobilization technique is feasible. The findings are also important because they contribute to the clinical and dosimetric correlation aspect in the use of IMRT to treat prostate cancer. A larger cohort may be needed to determine if there is a relationship between acute GU toxicity and (a) mean bladder dose and (b) irradiated bladder volume receiving > 65 Gy, > 70 Gy, or > 75 Gy. A larger cohort of patients treated to a higher dose may be needed to show a relationship between dose volume and acute GI toxicity.
TL;DR: Principal components analysis of rectoanal pressures identified 3 phenotypes (high anal, low rectal, and hybrid) that can discriminate among patients with normal and abnormal balloon expulsion time that might be useful to classify patients and increase the understanding of the pathogenesis of defecatory disorders.
TL;DR: Hyoscine butylbromide improves colonic distention during CT colonography and should be routinely administered where it is available, and use of a thin rectal tube for insufflation is adequate.
Abstract: PURPOSE: To investigate the effects of hyoscine butylbromide and an inflatable rectal balloon catheter on luminal distention during computed tomographic (CT) colonography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred thirty-six subjects undergoing CT colonography were randomized to receive either 20 mg or 40 mg of hyoscine butylbromide or no spasmolytic. Subjects were also independently randomized to undergo CT colonography with an inflatable rectal balloon catheter or a standard thin rectal tube. Multi–detector row CT colonography was performed with patients in prone and supine positions, with colonic segmental distention assessed by a single observer with a four-point scale. A simple assessment of whether distention was adequate for clinical interpretation was also made, and the effect of hyoscine butylbromide and catheter use was examined by using multivariate ordered logistic regression. RESULTS: Administration of hyoscine butylbromide was associated with significantly improved cecal (P = .05), ascending (P = ....
TL;DR: The results show the close association between rectal sensation and external anal sphincter contraction, and show that faecal incontinence may occur as a result of delayed or absent external anal spine contraction when the internal anal spHincter is relaxed.
Abstract: The relation between sensory perception of rapid balloon distension of the rectum and the motor responses of the rectum and external and internal anal sphincters in 27 normal subjects and 16 patients with faecal incontinence who had impaired rectal sensation but normal sphincter pressures was studied. In both patients and normal subjects, the onset and duration of rectal sensation correlated closely with the external anal sphincter electrical activity (r = 0.8, p less than 0.0001) and with rectal contraction (r = 0.51, p less than 0.001), but not with internal sphincter relaxation. All normal subjects perceived a rectal sensation within one second of rapid inflation of a rectal balloon with volumes of 20 ml or less air. Six patients did not perceive any rectal sensation until 60 ml had been introduced, while in the remaining nine patients the sensation was delayed by at least two seconds. Internal sphincter relaxation occurred before the sensation was perceived in three of 27 normal subjects and 11 of 16 patients (p less than 0.001), and could be associated with anal leakage, which stopped as soon as sensation was perceived. The lowest rectal volumes required to induce anal relaxation, to cause sustained relaxation, or to elicit sensations of a desire to defecate or pain were similar in patients and normal subjects. In conclusion, these results show the close association between rectal sensation and external anal sphincter contraction, and show that faecal incontinence may occur as a result of delayed or absent external anal sphincter contraction when the internal anal sphincter is relaxed.
TL;DR: Assessment of the effect of transanal endoscopic microsurgery on anorectal function found a reduction in internal sphincter tone, which did not affect continence in a short-term study.
Abstract: PURPOSE: Transanal endoscopic microsurgery is a new technique that has not yet found its place in routine practice. The procedure results in dilation of the anal sphincter with a large-diameter operating sigmoidoscope, sometimes for a prolonged period. The purpose of the present study was to assess the effect of transanal endoscopic microsurgery on anorectal function. METHODS: Eighteen consecutive patients undergoing transanal endoscopic microsurgery excision of rectal tumors, of whom 13 were available for evaluation, were included. Continence was scored by a numeric scale before surgery and at three and six weeks after surgery. Anorectal physiology studies were performed preoperatively and six weeks postoperatively with manometry, pudendal nerve motor terminal latency, anal mucosal electrosensitivity, rectal balloon volume studies, and endoanal ultrasound. RESULTS: There was a significant reduction in mean anal resting pressure (104 ± 32 cm H2O before surgery, 73 ± 30 cm H2O after surgery; P = 0.0009). There was no significant change in squeeze or cough pressure, pudendal nerve terminal motor latency, anal mucosal electrosensitivity, or rectal balloon study volumes. Fall in resting pressure was significantly correlated with length of operating time (r2 =0.39, P = 0.047). There was no significant change in mean continence score after surgery. CONCLUSION: Transanal endoscopic microsurgery results in a reduction in internal sphincter tone. This did not affect continence in a short-term study.