TL;DR: In this article, the reformation of manners campaign was described as a process of "indictment at quarter sessions". But the participants were plaintiffs, defendants, and justices of the peace.
Abstract: List of illustrations List of tables Acknowledgments List of abbreviations and conventions Part I. Background: 1. Introduction 2. Options for prosecution 3. Patterns of prosecutions Part II. Procedures For Prosecution: 4. Informal mediation by justices of the peace 5. Binding over by recognizance 6. Indictment at quarter sessions 7. Houses of correction Part III. The Contextx of Misdemeanor Prosecutions: 8. The participants: plaintiffs, defendants, and justices of the peace 9. The reformation of manners campaign 10. Geographical contexts 11. Conclusion Appendices Bibliography Index.
TL;DR: It is found that both officially sanctioned release criteria and "extralegal" variables were predictive of this decision to recommend a defendant for release on recognizance.
Abstract: Researchers have acknowledged the influence of pretrial release agencies in judicial decision making regarding bail; however, few researchers have focused on the process used by the pretrial release agencies to make bail-bond recommendations. In this study I sought to establish which factors were most salient in making the decision to recommend a defendant for release on recognizance. I found that both officially sanctioned release criteria and "extralegal" variables were predictive of this decision.
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors trace the development of the penal bond from debt recognizances defeasible by the performance of conditions stated in a separate document, and carry over the logic of the defeasibility recognizance was carried over to other arrangements including the penalty bond with endorsed conditional defeasance.
Abstract: The development of the penal bond with endorsed conditional defeasance presents a problem because the earliest monetary penalties in English contracts took the form of straight-forward penalty clauses. It is hard to see how the convoluted penal bond developed from such penalty clauses. This article traces the development of the penal bond from debt recognizances defeasible by the performance of conditions stated in a separate document. The logic of the defeasible recognizance was carried over to other arrangements including the penal bond with endorsed conditional defeasance.
TL;DR: In the early 1960s, release on recognizance was hailed as a method through which inequities inherent in the system of monetary bail could be reduced; this goal was to be accomplished through the revision of the criteria on which pretrial release decisions were made; the defendant's ties to the local community and not his financial status were emphasized.
Abstract: In the early 1960s, release on recognizance was hailed as a method through which inequities inherent in the system of monetary bail could be reduced. This goal was to be accomplished through the revision of the criteria on which pretrial release decisions were made; the defendant's ties to the local community and not his financial status were to be emphasized. Although the use of release on recognizance has become an accepted practice, these programs have escaped close examination. Using logit analysis, this article investigates the factors upon which release on recognizance was based in a western city. The findings suggest that decisions to release on recognizance were made more in accord with traditional criteria rather than those espoused by this reform movement.