Rebound headaches

Abstract: SYNOPSIS Out of 245 patients admitted to a two-month single-blind phase in a study with propranolol vs. placebo, 148 (72%) were propranolol responders. These responders were randomly assigned to propranolol or placebo for the following double-blind phase. After four weeks, they opted to either (1) remain on the assigned drug for 6 to 12 months or (2) to switch to the other drug for 6 to 12 months. In either case, they then switched drugs for a final one or two months of the study. No tolerance was found in 80 patients who remained on propranolol for at least six months. Resurgence of migraine was analyzed in 75 patients who took propranolol for at least six months and crossed over to placebo. Thirty-five patients (46%) continued to show the improvement achieved during propranolol therapy when it was discontinued and only 8 patients (11%) had rebound headaches. No serious complications were noted.

Abstract: Objective: To assess the attitudes, knowledge, and practice patterns of US neurologists regarding migraine management relative to the US Headache Consortium Guidelines (the Guidelines). Methods: Two samples of 600 neurologists each were selected from the American Academy of Neurology membership database. The first group received a Migraine Attitudes, Knowledge, and Practice Patterns (MKAPP) Survey. The second group received a Clinical Vignette (CV) Survey, presenting two patient histories and correspondent questions. Results: The MKAPP Survey showed that most neurologists felt that migraine was primarily a disease of the brain with a well-established neurobiological basis (69%) and an important part of their practice (60%). Most (53%) indicated that they routinely used neuroimaging in evaluating severe headache, an approach not recommended by the Guidelines. Most favored acute treatment limits, but 36% did not agree with the Guidelines that acute treatment should be limited to 2 or 3 days/week. In the CV Survey, for vignette 1, most (91%) correctly diagnosed migraine, 31% requested neuroimaging in the absence of indications, 64% appropriately recommended a triptan, and 45% recommended a preventive medication in the absence of indications. For vignette 2, 78% diagnosed migraine, 71% appropriately ordered neuroimaging, 80% appropriately recommended a preventive medication, and 38% prescribed a triptan in face of clear contraindication. Conclusions: Educational initiatives aiming to increase the awareness of the Guidelines among neurologists should highlight the full range of migraine symptoms that support the diagnosis, appropriate use of neuroimaging, indications for preventive treatments, issues of triptan cardiovascular safety, and preventing rebound headaches.

Abstract: SYNOPSIS This study examines the practicality and efficacy of dihydroergotamine mesylate (DHE) when self-administered sub-cutaneously in a population of refectory headache patients. Forty-three patients with chronic daily headache or migraine headache without aura, who had been taught self-injection of DHE either through the Raskin Protocol or in an outpatient headache clinic, were contacted by telephone and administered a questionnaire regarding usage and results from DHE injection. Ninety-two percent of patients could successfully administer DHE. Forty-six percent of patients experienced 90% or greater relief of pain and the majority of patients (77%) had greater than 50% relief. Emergency room use was decreased in 83% and 80% preferred DHE to their previous therapy. While side effects were common (79%), only four patients (9%) stopped DHE for this reason. No convincing evidence for the development of rebound headaches due to DHE was found in this sample.

Abstract: Medication overuse headache (MOH) is being recognised more often in headache, neurology and primary care clinics, but is still frequently overlooked. The most significant factor in the development of MOH is the lack of widespread awareness and understanding on the part of clinicians and patients. While the diagnosis of MOH may be suspected clinically, it can only be confirmed in retrospect. Diagnosis may take ≥3 months because of the need for prolonged observation after cessation of medication. Diagnosis must be based on observation of patterns of headaches and medication use, remembering that MOH is only seen in patients with migraine and not in those without. MOH should be viewed as an entity that is caused or propagated by frequently used medication taken for headache symptomatic relief. Because of easy availability and low expense, the greatest problem appears to be associated with barbiturate-containing combination analgesics and over-the-counter caffeine-containing combination analgesics. Even though triptan overuse headache is not encountered with great frequency, all triptans should be considered potential inducers of MOH. There are several different theories regarding the aetiology of MOH, including: (i) central sensitisation from repetitive activation of nociceptive pathways; (ii) a direct effect of the medication on the capacity of the brain to inhibit pain; (iii) a decrease in blood serotonin due to repetitive medication administration with attendant upregulation of serotonin receptors; (iv) cellular adaptation in the brain; and (v) changes in the periaqueductal grey matter. The principal approach to management of MOH is built around cessation of overused medication. Without discontinuation of the offending medication, improvement is almost impossible to attain. A three-step approach to treating patients with analgesic rebound headaches includes: (i) a bridging or transition programme; (ii) nonpharmacological measures; and (iii) prophylactic medication started early in the course of treatment (after offending medication is successfully discontinued). The best management advice is to raise awareness and strive for prevention. Prophylactic medications should be initiated for patients having ≥2 headache days per week. Anticipatory medication use should be discouraged and migraine-specific therapy should be considered as early as possible in the natural history of patients’ headaches. Reduction in headache risk factors should include behavioural modification approaches to headache control earlier in the natural history of migraine.