TL;DR: The question of the distribution of prime numbers is a subject which has fascinated mathematicians from the earliest times until the present as discussed by the authors, and which has always captivated me, although I have not worked in it myself.
Abstract: I would like to tell you today about a subject which, although I have not worked in it myself, has always extraordinarily captivated me, and which has fascinated mathematicians from the earliest times until the present namely, the question of the distribution of prime numbers. You certainly all know what a prime number is: it is a natural number bigger than 1 which is divisible by no other natural number except for I. That at least is the number theorist's definition; other mathematicians sometimes have other definitions. For the function-theorist, for instance, a prime number is an integral root of the analytic function
TL;DR: Use of preprocessing techniques involving space-time and additive-multiplicative tradeoffs reduces this upper bound to OA(N/log logN) and the bit complexity to O(N logN log log logLogN) bits.
Abstract: Given an integer N, what is the computational complexity of finding all the primes less than N? A modified sieve of Eratosthenes using doubly linked lists yields an algorithm of OA(N) arithmetic complexity. This upper bound is shown to be equivalent to the theoretical lower bound for sieve methods without preprocessing. Use of preprocessing techniques involving space-time and additive-multiplicative tradeoffs reduces this upper bound to OA(N/log logN) and the bit complexity to OB(N logN log log logN). A storage requirement is described using OB(N logN/log logN) bits as well.
TL;DR: In this paper, the Frobenius endomorphism F of a one-dimensional Noetherian local ring is assumed to be finite and the field k is algebraically closed and it is contained in A. Thus, in case # AssA 3 this assertion is not true and counterexamples are given.
Abstract: Let (A,m,k) be a one-dimensional Noetherian local ring of characteristic p (p > 0, a prime number) and assume that the Frobenius endomorphism F of A is finite. Further assume that the field k is algebraically closed and that it is contained in A. Let B denote A when it is regarded as an A-algebra by F. Then, if HomA (B,A) m B as B-modules, A is a Macaulay local ring and r(A) dimk Ext, (k,A) ( max{# Assii-1,1} where A denotes the m-adic completion of A. Thus, in case # AssA 3 this assertion is not true and the counterexamples are given.
TL;DR: In this article, it was shown that the tying together of local indices in these fields is caused by quadratic reciprocity and is not found in the g-part of S(K) where q is an odd prime number.
TL;DR: The largest truncatable primes in a given number base were estimated by a probabilistic argument and compared with computed values in this article, and the results were as follows (in decimal form).
Abstract: Truncatable primes are those that yield a sequence of primes when digits are removed always from the left or always from the right. The sizes of the largest truncatable primes in a given number base are estimated by a probabilistic argument and compared with computed values. The number 357686312646216567629137 is a prime, and, if successive digits are removed from the left, a sequence of primes ending 137, 37, 7 is obtained. We call such a number a left-truncatable prime and this particular one is the largest in decimal notation. Similarly 73939133 is the largest right-truncatable prime to base 10: it yields a sequence of primes . . . 73, 7 if we truncate from the right. The number 1979339339 has been quoted [1] as the largest right-truncatable prime; but we adhere to the convention that 1 is not a prime number, and so exclude it. We have computed La) the largest left-truncatable prime with base a, for 3 < a < 11 , and Ra ,the largest right-truncatable prime with base a, for 3 < a < 15. The results are as follows (in decimal form).
TL;DR: In 1933 D. H. Lehmer [3], in connexion with a method for discovering large prime numbers, posed the following question: where a is the leading (positive) coefficient of the minimal polynomial of α.
Abstract: In 1933 D. H. Lehmer [3], in connexion with a method for discovering large prime numbers, posed the following question. Let α be an algebraic integer of degree D with conjugates α = α1, α2, ..., αD and put[EQUATION]where a is the leading (positive) coefficient of the minimal polynomial of α.
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors discuss several related properties satisfied in general, as well as giving sufficient conditions for groups to satisfy these properties and give examples of primes p and finite groups G that do not satisfy them.
Abstract: Let p be a prime number, G a finite group whose order is divisible by p, and S a Sylow /»-subgroup of G. We say that G satisfies (•) if there exists g e G such that 51 n Sg « Op(G). There are examples of primes p and finite groups G that do not satisfy (»). In this note we discuss several related properties satisfied in general, as well as giving sufficient conditions for G to satisfy (•).
TL;DR: In this paper, it was shown that for all sufficiently large prime numbers p, H*(BX,F) is a graded polynomial algebra over F, with generators in dimensions (2ni).
TL;DR: In this article, a duality identity between large and small prime factors of integers and its relationship with the prime number theorem for arithmetic progressions is studied, which leads to interesting relations involving the Mobius function.
TL;DR: In this article, a method is developed for identifying effects and confounding patterns in factorial designs generated by Patterson's (1976) DSIGN algorithm, which is an extension of that com- monly used for symmetrical designs with prime number of levels.
Abstract: SUMMARY A method is developed for identifying effects and confounding patterns in factorial designs generated by Patterson's (1976) DSIGN algorithm. The method is an extension of that com- monly used for symmetrical designs with prime number of levels. Das (1964) described an equivalent method in which some of the treatment factors are designated as basic factors and the others as added factors. Levels of added factors are derived by combination of the levels of the basic factors over GF(t). White & Hultquist (1965) extended the field method to designs with numbers of levels of treatment factors still prime or prime power but possibly differing from one factor to another. John & Dean (1975) described the construction of a particular class of single replicate block designs, which they call generalized cyclic designs. The levels of treatment factors are now integers 0, 1, ..., t - 1. The essential feature of the method is that the m-tuples giving the treatments of a particular block constitute an Abelian group, the intrablock subgroup. The method gives the same single-replicate designs as the field method when t is prime. Treatment levels are, however, differently represented when t is a power of a prime and so, in general, different designs are obtained. Unlike the field method, the generalized cyclic method is also available when t is neither prime nor prime power. Dean & John (1975) extended their method to asymmetrical designs. Patterson (1976) described a general computer algorithm, called DSIGN, in which levels of treatment factors are derived by linear combinations of levels of plot and block factors. The method provides finite-field, generalized cyclic and other designs. It is not restricted to block designs but is available for any of the simple block structures defined by Nelder (1965) with fractional, single or multiple replication of treatments. In the present paper we are concerned with identification of effects and confounding in the DSIGN method. We tackle the problem by inspecting linear combinations of levels of treatment factors. This approach is, of course, familiar for finite-field designs: Kempthorne (1947) has
TL;DR: In this article, the authors used the sieve of Eratosthenes to relate the trigonometrical sum to the bilinear form of the Mobius function in order to give estimates for the distribution of αp modulo 1 which are sharper than those obtained by I M Vinogradov.
Abstract: In [4] we have given a simple method of estimating trigonometrical sums over prime numbers Here we show how the argument can be adapted in order to give estimates for the distribution of αp modulo 1 which are sharper than those obtained by I M Vinogradov [5], [6] Vinogradov uses the sieve of Eratosthenes to relate the sumto the bilinear formthe function μ being the Mobius function When d1 … ds is small compared with N this can be treated in a fairly straightforward manner However, in order to treat the terms with d1 …ds close to N, Vinogradov has to introduce an argument of a rather recondite combinatorial nature
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present a model of ZF set theory in which the principle of dependent choices and the prime ideal theorem for Boolean algebras are both true while the axiom of choice is false.
Abstract: Publisher Summary This chapter presents a model of ZF set theory in which the principle of dependent choices and the prime ideal theorem for Boolean algebras are both true while the axiom of choice is false. The problem of finding such a model remained open despite considerable effort. It contains a model that is considered to be the best candidate for the theorem, together with an incomplete proof sketch along the lines of the original independence proof of the axiom of choice from the prime ideal theorem. No progress has been made on this model. The chapter presents some further applications of the method without proof. The prime ideal theorem, Hahn Banach theorem, and canonical uniform ultrafilter principle (a uniform ultrafilter includes all sets whose complements are well orderable and have smaller cardinality. The principle states that there is a function assigning a uniform ultrafilter to the power set of each infinite set) can be added to the class of automatic ZF transferable Fraenkel–Mostowski independences.