Scispace (Formerly Typeset)
  1. Home
  2. Topics
  3. Port (computer networking)
  4. 2014
  1. Home
  2. Topics
  3. Port (computer networking)
  4. 2014
Showing papers on "Port (computer networking) published in 2014"
Journal Article•10.1080/01441647.2014.891162•
The Greening of Ports: A Comparison of Port Management Tools Used by Leading Ports in Asia and Europe

[...]

Jasmine Siu Lee Lam1, Theo Notteboom2•
Nanyang Technological University1, Antwerp Maritime Academy2
08 Apr 2014-Transport Reviews
TL;DR: In this article, the authors investigate the port management tools that port/public authorities have at their disposal and then to analyse to what extent the tools are used to enforce or encourage green port development at functional activities of port operations and development.

344 citations

Journal Article•10.1016/J.ENPOL.2014.04.013•
Energy management in seaports: A new role for port authorities

[...]

Michele Acciaro1, Hilda Ghiara2, Maria Inés Cusano2•
Kühne Logistics University1, University of Genoa2
01 Aug 2014-Energy Policy
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors argue that for the ports of the future active energy management can offer substantial efficiency gains, can contribute to the development of new alternative revenue sources and in the end, improve the competitive position of the port.

326 citations

Journal Article•10.1080/03088839.2014.932926•
Environmental sustainability in seaports: a framework for successful innovation

[...]

Michele Acciaro1, Thierry Vanelslander2, Christa Sys2, Claudio Ferrari3, Athena Roumboutsos4, Genevieve Giuliano5, Jasmine Siu Lee Lam6, Seraphim Kapros4 •
Kühne Logistics University1, University of Antwerp2, University of Genoa3, University of the Aegean4, University of Southern California5, Nanyang Technological University6
12 Sep 2014-Maritime Policy & Management
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors investigated successful innovations improving environmental sustainability of seaports and developed a method for quantifying the degree of success of innovat... from a methodological perspective.
Abstract: Environmental sustainability in the port industry is of growing concern for port authorities, policy makers, port users and local communities. Innovation can provide a solution to the main environmental issues, but often meets resistance. While certain types of technological or organisational innovation can be satisfactorily analysed using closed system theories, in the case of seaports and in particular in the area of environmental sustainability, more advanced conceptual frameworks have to be considered. These frameworks need to be able to account for the multiple stakeholder nature of the port industry and of the network and vertical interactions that environmental sustainability calls for. This article investigates successful innovations improving environmental sustainability of seaports. The proposed framework builds in part on research concepts developed in the InnoSuTra EU FP7 project. From a methodological perspective, this article develops a method for quantifying the degree of success of innovat...

266 citations

Journal Article•10.1016/J.ATMOSENV.2013.10.006•
Ship emissions inventory, social cost and eco-efficiency in Shanghai Yangshan port

[...]

Su Song
01 Jan 2014-Atmospheric Environment
TL;DR: In this paper, a sophisticated activity-based methodology, supported by the ship-by-ship and real-time data from the modern automatic identification system (AIS), was introduced to obtain accurate estimates of ship emissions.

231 citations

Journal Article•10.1016/J.ENPOL.2013.09.024•
The role of sea ports in end-to-end maritime transport chain emissions

[...]

David Gibbs1, Patrick Rigot-Müller2, John Mangan2, Chandra Lalwani1•
University of Hull1, Newcastle University2
01 Jan 2014-Energy Policy
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors investigate the role of sea ports in helping to mitigate the GHG emissions associated with the end-to-end maritime transport chain and suggest that ports might have more impact through focusing their efforts on reducing shipping emissions.

182 citations

Journal Article•10.1016/J.TRANPOL.2014.08.003•
Port infrastructure investment and regional economic growth in China: Panel evidence in port regions and provinces

[...]

Lili Song1, Lili Song2, Marina van Geenhuizen3•
Harbin Normal University1, Harbin Institute of Technology2, Delft University of Technology3
01 Nov 2014-Transport Policy
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors estimate the output elasticity of port infrastructure through production function, applying panel data analysis for the period of 1999-2010, and calculate the model at the level of four port regions as well as the port province level.

165 citations

Journal Article•10.1016/J.MARPOLBUL.2014.02.006•
Identification and selection of Environmental Performance Indicators for sustainable port development.

[...]

Martí Puig1, Chris Wooldridge2, R.M. Darbra1•
Polytechnic University of Catalonia1, Cardiff University2
15 Apr 2014-Marine Pollution Bulletin
TL;DR: This study has drawn on major research projects to blend academic research with input from marine professionals in order to identify, select, evaluate and validate EPIs that are acceptable and feasible to the sector, and practicable in their application and implementation.

164 citations

Journal Article•10.1016/J.TRA.2014.04.006•
Ports and regional development: A spatial analysis on a panel of European regions

[...]

Anna Bottasso1, Maurizio Conti1, Claudio Ferrari1, Alessio Tei1•
University of Genoa1
01 Jul 2014-Transportation Research Part A-policy and Practice
TL;DR: In this paper, the impact of port activities on local development for a sample of 621 TL-3 regions located in thirteen European countries and observed over the period 1998-2009 was analyzed.
Abstract: This paper analyses the impact of port activities on local development for a sample of 621 TL-3 regions located in thirteen European countries and observed over the period 1998–2009. Using a spatial panel econometric framework which controls for spatial fixed effects, the paper provides an estimate of both the direct and indirect (i.e. spillover) effects associated to port activities. Results suggest that ports might have non-negligible effects on local GDP: interestingly, an important share of the effects takes place outside the region where the port is located.

154 citations

Journal Article•10.1155/2014/802976•
Evaluation of Green Port Factors and Performance: A Fuzzy AHP Analysis

[...]

Rong-Her Chiu, Le-Hui Lin, Shih-Chan Ting
12 Jan 2014-Mathematical Problems in Engineering
TL;DR: In this article, a Fuzzy AHP model including five dimensions and thirteen factors as the guidelines for green port operation is proposed to tackle the environmental pollution coming from the construction and operation of a port, and the results of empirical study point out the top five priority attributes of green port operations which are hazardous waste handling, air pollution, water pollution, port greenery, and habitat quality maintenance.
Abstract: Due to the occurrence of abnormal global environmental change, the concept of sustainable development becomes more and more important. Port plays an important role in economic development for a country. To tackle the environmental pollution coming from the construction and operation of a port, the green concept emerged as a solution. Founded on the previous literatures, the current study formulates a Fuzzy AHP model including five dimensions and thirteen factors as the guidelines for green port operation. The results of empirical study point out the top five priority attributes of green port operation which are: hazardous waste handling, air pollution, water pollution, port greenery, and habitat quality maintenance. The FAHP model is a good referral for decision makers of port organizations to forge a “greener” port operation; it also can be used to evaluate the port’s green operation performance.

143 citations

Journal Article•10.1016/J.TRANPOL.2014.02.009•
Environmental efficiency analysis of port cities: Slacks-based measure data envelopment analysis approach

[...]

Taehwee Lee1, Gi-Tae Yeo1, Vinh V. Thai2•
Incheon National University1, Nanyang Technological University2
01 May 2014-Transport Policy
TL;DR: In this paper, a slacks-based data envelopment analysis (SBM-DEA) model was used to assess the environmental efficiency of port cities, and the results showed that Singapore, Busan, Rotterdam, Kaohsiung, Antwerp, and New York are the most environmentally efficient port cities.

133 citations

Journal Article•10.1016/J.JTRANGEO.2014.07.007•
Port system evolution: the case of Latin America and the Caribbean.

[...]

Gordon Wilmsmeier1, Jason Monios2, Gabriel Pérez-Salas1•
United Nations Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean1, Transport Research Institute2
01 Jul 2014-Journal of Transport Geography
TL;DR: In this article, the authors investigated the role of secondary ports in the evolution of a port system, and identified some of the key factors influencing the transition from concentration at a few dominant ports to a deconcentrated system of primary and secondary ports.
Journal Article•10.1016/J.EJOR.2013.09.041•
Methods for strategic liner shipping network design

[...]

Judith Mulder1, Rommert Dekker1•
Erasmus University Rotterdam1
01 Jun 2014-European Journal of Operational Research
TL;DR: In this article, a composite solution approach is proposed in which the ports are first aggregated into port clusters to reduce the problem size, when the cargo flows are disaggregated, a feeder service network is introduced to ship the cargo within a port cluster.
Journal Article•10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2014.03.050•
Implementing industrial ecology in port cities: international overview of case studies and cross-case analysis

[...]

Juliette Cerceau1, Nicolas Mat1, Guillaume Junqua1, Liming Lin1, Valérie Laforest2, Catherine Gonzalez1 •
École Normale Supérieure1, Ecole nationale supérieure des mines de Saint-Étienne2
01 Jul 2014-Journal of Cleaner Production
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present the result of a research project (2011-2012) consisting of an international inventory of innovative resource management initiatives in port areas, and analyze 23 port industrial ecology initiatives.
Journal Article•10.1080/03088839.2013.839515•
Modelling port choice in an uncertain environment

[...]

Gi-Tae Yeo1, Adolf K.Y. Ng2, Paul Tae-Woo Lee3, Zaili Yang4•
Incheon National University1, University of Manitoba2, Soochow University (Taiwan)3, Liverpool John Moores University4
08 Apr 2014-Maritime Policy & Management
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors propose a new conceptual port choice method by explaining the role fuzzy logic in evidential reasoning in a complementary way, in which various forms of raw data (either objective or subjective) collected to evaluate port performance can first be converted into and presented as fuzzy grades defined using linguistics terms with degrees of belief (DoBs) and second be co...
Abstract: Port choice is an important issue to be investigated to ensure the effective integration of container supply chains and the sustainable development of regional economy. The selection of appropriate ports to facilitate shipping activities and international trade is crucial for many stakeholders, including shipping lines, port administrators, cargo shippers and national governments. The task is essentially a process of multiple criterion decision-making (MCDM) under uncertainty, requiring analysts to derive rational decisions from uncertain and incomplete data related to different quantitative and qualitative determinants. This paper aims at proposing a new conceptual port choice method by explaining the role fuzzy logic in evidential reasoning in a complementary way, in which various forms of raw data (either objective or subjective) collected to evaluate port performance can first be converted into and presented as fuzzy grades defined using linguistics terms with degrees of belief (DoBs) and second be co...
Journal Article•10.1007/S13437-013-0040-Y•
Sustainable development in seaports: a multi-case study

[...]

Vijay Hiranandani
16 Apr 2014-WMU journal of maritime affairs
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present findings from a qualitative multi-case study that aimed to compare sustainable policies and practices of ports in four different continents and to understand the dilemmas, challenges and opportunities they face in attaining sustainable development.
Abstract: Seaports are a vital part of the maritime transport industry and have a key role in integrated transport chains and regional economies. However, ports are also sites of environmental pollution originating from land-based activities, ship movements and ports’ own activities. It is, therefore, increasingly recognised that economic growth in ports must be balanced with environmental protection and social progress. This has led to enhanced appreciation of the need for sustainable development (SD) in ports. Whilst much has been written about port environmental practices in European and American ports, there is limited synthesis and comparison of sustainable port practices from different parts of the world. Furthermore, in-depth case analysis and critical examination of the practices and challenges of sustainable port development in a globalised era is limited. This paper presents findings from a qualitative multi-case study that aimed to compare sustainable policies and practices of ports in four different continents and to understand the dilemmas, challenges and opportunities they face in attaining SD. This paper reports findings pertaining to the following research questions: (1) What policy frameworks do ports adopt to attain sustainable development? (2) What specific sustainable practices do ports utilise to manage environmental aspects such as air pollution, water quality, ballast water, dredging and disposal of dredged materials, waste disposal, hazardous substances and land/resource use? (3) What are the driving and constraining forces in achieving sustainable development in ports? Port authorities were studied by reviewing documents and secondary data. The following ports were studied: Port of Long Beach (USA), Port of Rotterdam Authority (The Netherlands), Sydney Ports Corporation (Australia) and Transnet Limited that owns and manages South African ports. Findings of the study demonstrate that the SD paradigm has gained momentum, albeit to differing degrees, in the functioning, organisation and the very ethos of case study ports. An important theme from all case studies is that, whilst there is definite progress towards SD, several practices deemed to be sustainable can be controversial and must be critically examined from the perspectives of different stakeholders including shippers, port-related businesses and the local and global community. Lack of data to monitor environmental impacts, economic costs of implementing sustainable practices and complexities of international, regional and national regulations were other constraining factors. On the other hand, reconciling differences between stakeholders and capitalising on economic opportunities, operational efficiencies and cost savings offered by environmental friendliness can advance port SD. Public–private partnerships and policies negotiated by involving all stakeholders were found to foster port sustainability. Most importantly, this study found that, with globalisation, environmental impacts of ports are not always localised. ‘Sustainable’ practices can have unintended consequences in other parts of the world. Therefore, globalisation necessitates a more critical and global analysis of port operations and environment practices in order to be truly sustainable. Although the scope of the research findings is limited to case study ports, the lessons drawn can be constructively applied to any port operating within an institutional system of structured SD.
Journal Article•10.1080/03088839.2013.839517•
A game theory analysis of port specialization—implications to the Chinese port industry

[...]

Weifen Zhuang1, Meifeng Luo2, Xiaowen Fu3•
Xiamen University1, Hong Kong Polytechnic University2, University of Sydney3
08 Apr 2014-Maritime Policy & Management
TL;DR: In this article, a Stackelberg game and a simultaneous game are used to model port competition, where ports provide differentiated services in the sectors of containerized cargo and dry-bulk cargo.
Abstract: The fast growth of the Chinese economy and its international seaborne trade has escalated the demand for high-quality and efficient port services. “Decentralization” of the port management regime has given local government greater freedom in port development and operational decision-making. However, major port capacity expansion in coastal areas, coupled with the slowing down of both the economy and trade growth over recent years, has led to overcapacity and excessive competition. Although both port specialization and government regulations are called for to address these issues, few studies have investigated the formation mechanism and economic implications of port specialization. This paper uses alternative duopoly games, namely a Stackelberg game and a simultaneous game, to model port competition, where ports provide differentiated services in the sectors of containerized cargo and dry-bulk cargo. Our analytical results reveal that inter-port competition can lead to port specialization in the following...
Journal Article•10.1016/J.MEASUREMENT.2013.09.012•
Estimation of ship emissions in the port of Taranto

[...]

Francesco Adamo1, Gregorio Andria1, G. Cavone1, Claudio De Capua, Anna Maria Lucia Lanzolla1, Rosario Morello, Maurizio Spadavecchia1 •
Instituto Politécnico Nacional1
01 Jan 2014-Measurement
TL;DR: In this article, the authors gather and analyze the data associated with the berthing operations and resulting emissions to better define suitable actions for emissions reduction and to suggest some possible strategies for bringing down pollutants, in order to reach a wealth based on environmental preservation.
Journal Article•10.1016/J.TRE.2014.05.008•
Port service chains and port performance evaluation

[...]

Wayne K. Talley1, ManWo Ng1, Erika Marsillac1•
Old Dominion University1
01 Sep 2014-Transportation Research Part E-logistics and Transportation Review
TL;DR: In this article, a novel and unique methodology for evaluating the effectiveness performance of a port's individual services by utilizing the concept of the port service chain is presented, a service network utilized by a port service provider in the provision of the services that accounts for the quality-of-service relationships among the services.
Abstract: This paper provides a novel and unique methodology for evaluating the effectiveness performance of a port’s individual services by utilizing the concept of a port service chain – a service network utilized by a port’s service providers in the provision of the port’s services that accounts for the quality-of-service relationships among the services. If such relationships are ignored, the resource allocations by the port’s service providers to improve the quality of their port services will either over- or underestimate the amount of resources needed. A cooperative port service chain will always (under certain conditions) be more effective than a non-cooperative port service chain.
Journal Article•10.1016/J.TRANPOL.2014.04.006•
Economic impact of port sectors on South African economy: An input-output analysis

[...]

Young-Tae Chang1, Sung-Ho Shin2, Paul Tae-Woo Lee3•
Inha University1, Hong Kong Polytechnic University2, Soochow University (Taiwan)3
01 Sep 2014-Transport Policy
TL;DR: In this article, the authors presented an input-output analysis on how the port sectors impact a concerned economy using the South African case and reported how a rectangular Supply and Use Table system of national accounts can be converted to a traditional square symmetric matrix type system.
Methods for strategic liner shipping network design

[...]

Judith Mulder1, Rommert Dekker1•
Erasmus University Rotterdam1
1 Jun 2014
TL;DR: A composite solution approach is proposed in which the ports are first aggregated into port clusters to reduce the problem size, and when the cargo flows are disaggregated, a feeder service network is introduced to ship the cargo within a port cluster.
Abstract: In this paper the combined fleet-design, ship-scheduling and cargo-routing problem with limited availability of ships in liner shipping is considered. A composite solution approach is proposed in which the ports are first aggregated into port clusters to reduce the problem size. When the cargo flows are disaggregated, a feeder service network is introduced to ship the cargo within a port cluster. The solution method is tested on a problem instance containing 58 ports on the Asia-Europe trade lane of Maersk. The best obtained profit gives an improvement of more than 10% compared to the reference network based on the Maersk network.
Journal Article•10.1016/J.TRE.2014.03.008•
An analysis of the determinants of cruise traffic: An empirical application to the Spanish port system

[...]

José I. Castillo-Manzano1, Xavier Fageda2, Fernando González-Laxe•
University of Seville1, University of Barcelona2
01 Jun 2014-Transportation Research Part E-logistics and Transportation Review
TL;DR: In this article, the authors studied the determinants that affect the capacity of ports to attract cruise ships in Spain and found that the likelihood of having cruise traffic is linked to ports located in populous areas and close to large airports, ports not specialized in container traffic but sharing facilities with ferries traffic and ports having a minimum depth of water.
Abstract: We study the determinants that affect the capacity of ports to attract cruise ships in Spain. The conclusion is that the likelihood of having cruise traffic is linked to ports located in populous areas and close to large airports, ports not specialized in container traffic but sharing facilities with ferries traffic and ports having a minimum depth of water. The amount of cruise traffic that a port can generate is also related to the population and the air connections, along with the tourist appeal and the facilities shared with other types of port traffic, namely roll-on roll-off and ferries.
Journal Article•10.1016/J.JTRANGEO.2014.02.011•
Governing inland ports: a multi-dimensional approach to addressing inland port–city challenges in European transport corridors

[...]

Patrick Witte1, Bart Wiegmans2, Frank van Oort1, Tejo Spit1•
Utrecht University1, Delft University of Technology2
01 Apr 2014-Journal of Transport Geography
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors apply the concept of port-city challenges to inland ports and find that challenges facing inland port and cities take many forms but that all share a commonality in the trade-offs between positive and negative externalities.
Journal Article•10.1016/S1665-6423(14)71625-6•
A Collaborative Supply Chain Management System for a Maritime Port Logistics Chain

[...]

Luis M. Ascencio1, Rosa G. González-Ramírez2, Lorena Bearzotti2, Neale R. Smith3, José-Fernando Camacho-Vallejo4 •
University of Tarapacá1, Pontifical Catholic University of Valparaíso2, Monterrey Institute of Technology and Higher Education3, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León4
01 Jun 2014-Journal of Applied Research and Technology
TL;DR: In this article, a collaborative logistics framework for a Port Logistics Chain (PLC) based on the principles of Supply Chain Management (SCM) that rely on stakeholders integration and collaboration is proposed, providing a reference model for the inland coordination of the PLC.
Journal Article•10.1177/0309132513516178•
The changing tides of port geography (1950–2012):

[...]

Adolf K.Y. Ng1, César Ducruet•
University of Manitoba1
07 Mar 2014-Progress in Human Geography
TL;DR: In this article, the authors investigated the trends and changing tides of port geography research, pointing out the emergence of the core community shifting from mainstream geography research to increasing connection with other disciplines, notably transport studies.
Abstract: Human geographers actively studied ports in past decades. However, the extent to which port geography constituted a specific research stream within human geography remained largely unanswered. By reviewing 399 port papers published in major geography journals, the authors critically investigated the trends and changing tides of port geography research. The findings point out the emergence of the core community shifting from mainstream geography research to increasing connection with other disciplines, notably transport studies. The paper offers a progressive view on human geographers’ abilities to form a research community on port development, while identifying opportunities in the pursuit of collaboration between different academic disciplines.
Journal Article•10.1016/J.ECOTRA.2014.06.002•
Hub port competition and welfare effects of strategic privatization

[...]

Achim I. Czerny1, Felix Höffler2, Se-il Mun3•
VU University Amsterdam1, University of Cologne2, Kyoto University3
01 Sep 2014-Economics of Transportation
TL;DR: In this article, the authors investigate the effect of port privatization in a setting with two ports located in different countries, each serving their home market but also competing for the transshipment traffic from a third region.
Journal Article•10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2013.07.032•
Stakeholder perceptions and involvement in the implementation of EMS in ports in Vietnam and Cambodia

[...]

Xuan-Quynh Le1, Van-Hieu Vu1, Luc Hens, Bas van Heur1•
Vrije Universiteit Brussel1
01 Feb 2014-Journal of Cleaner Production
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present an assessment of the implementation of the Environmental Management System (EMS) through the eyes of various groups of port stakeholders, including coordinators or managers at each port, as well as key port stakeholders.
Journal Article•10.1016/J.TRA.2014.01.007•
Traffic consolidation in East Asian container ports: A network flow analysis

[...]

Yuhong Wang1, Kevin Cullinane2•
Transport Research Institute1, University of Gothenburg2
01 Mar 2014-Transportation Research Part A-policy and Practice
TL;DR: This paper assesses the impact of freight traffic consolidation in the container port industry by exploring the spatial pattern of traffic flow movements and identifying the variety of roles that container ports play within this context.
Abstract: The proliferation of hub-and-spoke operations in maritime container transportation has resulted in the widespread consolidation of traffic flows. Utilising liner shipping network configurations, this paper assesses the impact of freight traffic consolidation in the container port industry by exploring the spatial pattern of traffic flow movements and identifying the variety of roles that container ports play within this context. On the basis of the network concept, the spatial inequality of freight traffic consolidation is determined by the density and direction of all meaningful connections (i.e. significant flows) identified by applying Multiple Linkage Analysis (MLA) to an initial traffic flow matrix. The effectiveness of the chosen methodology is tested empirically using a sample comprising the 18 major container ports in East Asia, together with another 21 important container ports located on the East–West trading route. Based on this sample network, the spatial structure of traffic flow consolidation reveals the nature and structure of hub-and-spoke operations within a port system, the relative hub-dependence of ports, the variety of roles which individual ports play within the overall structure of inter-port interactions and the hierarchical configuration of the port industry structure. The paper concludes that MLA offers new insights into the distributional inequality of traffic flows, the spatial and economic interactions between ports and the extent to which hinterlands overlap. Furthermore, the analysis clearly shows that inter-port relationships can no longer be evaluated as isolated phenomena; any change in a specific port’s competitiveness will directly impact upon the structure of the whole maritime transportation system. Port authorities and terminal operators will need, therefore, to carefully analyse and disentangle specific inter-port relationships in order to provide the most appropriate basis for their decision making.
Journal Article•10.1016/J.TRE.2014.04.008•
Incentive approaches to overcome moral hazard in port concession agreements

[...]

Grace W.Y. Wang1, Athanasios A. Pallis2•
Texas A&M University at Galveston1, University of the Aegean2
01 Jul 2014-Transportation Research Part E-logistics and Transportation Review
TL;DR: In this article, a game theory foundation for port concession agreements, using the incentive mechanism design, is provided, and a model involving performance-based concession fees to align successfully the Port Authorities interests with those of the terminal operators.
Abstract: This paper provides a game theory foundation for port concession agreements, using the incentive mechanism design. This study identifies the post contractual moral hazard problem, and provides a model involving performance-based concession fees to align successfully the Port Authorities’ interests with those of the terminal operators. To match theory and practice, factual information of recent projects in Europe and the US is reviewed. Evidently, to avoid transaction failures in a Greenfield concession, the port authority needs to identify clearly the objectives undertaken. The port should have the ability to enforce the contract and determine the process of quality assurance.
Journal Article•10.1016/J.TRA.2014.09.005•
Cluster analysis of the competitiveness of container ports in Brazil

[...]

Alexandra Maria Rios Cabral1, Francisco de Sousa Ramos2•
Federal University of Alagoas1, Federal University of Pernambuco2
01 Nov 2014-Transportation Research Part A-policy and Practice
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors focused on the Brazilian container terminals that handled containers in 2009 and compared port competitiveness and showed that the terminal of Tecon in the port of Santos has the best performance of all.
Abstract: The container cargo proportion of total maritime transport increased from 3% in 1980 to 16% in 2011. The largest Brazilian port, the port of Santos, is the 42nd largest container port in the world. However, Santos’ performance indicators are much lower than those of the world’s largest ports, so comparisons with them are difficult. This article focuses on the Brazilian container terminals that handled containers in 2009 and compares port competitiveness. This study classified seventeen Brazilian container terminals into three distinct groups based on the following competitiveness criteria: number of containers handled, berth length, number of berths, terminal tariffs (in US$), berth depth, rate of medium consignment (in containers/ship), medium board (containers/hour), average waiting time for mooring (in hours/ship), and average waiting time for load or unload cargo (in hours/ship). This classification used a hierarchical cluster analysis. The classification shows that the terminal of Tecon in the port of Santos has the best performance of all, while small terminals (<150,000 container units) are the worst performing terminals in Brazil.
Journal Article•10.1080/01441647.2014.905650•
Corporatisation and Performance: A Literature Review and an Analysis of the Performance Effects of the Corporatisation of Port of Rotterdam Authority

[...]

Peter W. de Langen1, Christiaan Heij2•
Eindhoven University of Technology1, Erasmus University Rotterdam2
30 Apr 2014-Transport Reviews
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present a case study on the effects of corporatisation of PAs, namely for the Port of Rotterdam Authority, a publicly owned but corporatised port development company.
...

Tools

SciSpace AgentBiomedical AgentSciSpace RecruitSciSpace for EnterpriseAgent GalleryChat with PDFLiterature ReviewAI WriterFind TopicsParaphraserCitation GeneratorExtract DataAI DetectorCitation Booster

Learn

ResourcesLive Workshops

SciSpace

CareersSupportBrowse PapersPricingSciSpace Affiliate ProgramCancellation & Refund PolicyTermsPrivacyData Sources

Directories

PapersTopicsJournalsAuthorsConferencesInstitutionsCitation StylesWriting templates

Extension & Apps

SciSpace Chrome ExtensionSciSpace Mobile App

Contact

support@scispace.com
SciSpace

© 2026 | PubGenius Inc. | Suite # 217 691 S Milpitas Blvd Milpitas CA 95035, USA

soc2
Secured by Delve