About: Polychoric correlation is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 384 publications have been published within this topic receiving 20783 citations.
TL;DR: Estimation of polychoric correlations is robust to modest violations of underlying normality and WLS performed adequately only at the largest sample size but led to substantial estimation difficulties with smaller samples.
Abstract: Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) is widely used for examining hypothesized relations among ordinal variables (e.g., Likert-type items). A theoretically appropriate method fits the CFA model to polychoric correlations using either weighted least squares (WLS) or robust WLS. Importantly, this approach assumes that a continuous, normal latent process determines each observed variable. The extent to which violations of this assumption undermine CFA estimation is not well-known. In this article, the authors empirically study this issue using a computer simulation study. The results suggest that estimation of polychoric correlations is robust to modest violations of underlying normality. Further, WLS performed adequately only at the largest sample size but led to substantial estimation difficulties with smaller samples. Finally, robust WLS performed well across all conditions.
TL;DR: In this paper, a structural equation model with a generalized measurement part was proposed for dichotomous and ordered categorical variables (indicators) in addition to continuous ones, and a computationally feasible three-stage estimator is proposed for any combination of observed variable types.
Abstract: A structural equation model is proposed with a generalized measurement part, allowing for dichotomous and ordered categorical variables (indicators) in addition to continuous ones. A computationally feasible three-stage estimator is proposed for any combination of observed variable types. This approach provides large-sample chi-square tests of fit and standard errors of estimates for situations not previously covered. Two multiple-indicator modeling examples are given. One is a simultaneous analysis of two groups with a structural equation model underlying skewed Likert variables. The second is a longitudinal model with a structural model for multivariate probit regressions.
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors considered the most appropriate parallel analysis procedure to assess the number of common factors underlying ordered polytomously scored variables, and proposed minimum rank factor analysis (MRFA) as an extraction method, rather than the currently applied principal component analysis (PCA) and principal axes factoring.
Abstract: Parallel analysis (PA) is an often-recommended approach for assessment of the dimensionality of a variable set. PA is known in different variants, which may yield different dimensionality indications. In this article, the authors considered the most appropriate PA procedure to assess the number of common factors underlying ordered polytomously scored variables. They proposed minimum rank factor analysis (MRFA) as an extraction method, rather than the currently applied principal component analysis (PCA) and principal axes factoring. A simulation study, based on data with major and minor factors, showed that all procedures consistently point at the number of major common factors. A polychoric-based PA slightly outperformed a Pearson-based PA, but convergence problems may hamper its empirical application. In empirical practice, PA-MRFA with a 95% threshold based on polychoric correlations or, in case of nonconvergence, Pearson correlations with mean thresholds appear to be a good choice for identification of the number of common factors. PA-MRFA is a common-factor-based method and performed best in the simulation experiment. PA based on PCA with a 95% threshold is second best, as this method showed good performances in the empirically relevant conditions of the simulation experiment.
TL;DR: The program FACTOR is presented, which was designed as a general, user-friendly program for computing EFA, which implements traditional procedures and indices and incorporates the benefits of some more recent developments.
Abstract: Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) is one of the most widely used statistical procedures in psychological research It is a classic technique, but statistical research into EFA is still quite active, and various new developments and methods have been presented in recent years The authors of the most popular statistical packages, however, do not seem very interested in incorporating these new advances We present the program FACTOR, which was designed as a general, user-friendly program for computing EFA It implements traditional procedures and indices and incorporates the benefits of some more recent developments Two of the traditional procedures implemented are polychoric correlations and parallel analysis, the latter of which is considered to be one of the best methods for determining the number of factors or components to be retained Good examples of the most recent developments implemented in our program are (1) minimum rank factor analysis, which is the only factor method that allows one to compute the proportion of variance explained by each factor, and (2) the simplimax rotation method, which has proved to be the most powerful rotation method available Of these methods, only polychoric correlations are available in some commercial programs A copy of the software, a demo, and a short manual can be obtained free of charge from the first author
TL;DR: In this paper, the polychoric correlation is discussed as a generalization of the tetrachoric correlation coefficient to more than two classes and two estimation methods are discussed: maximum likelihood estimation, and what may be called "two-step maximum likelihood" estimation.
Abstract: The polychoric correlation is discussed as a generalization of the tetrachoric correlation coefficient to more than two classes. Two estimation methods are discussed: Maximum likelihood estimation, and what may be called “two-step maximum likelihood” estimation. For the latter method, the thresholds are estimated in the first step. For both methods, asymptotic covariance matrices for estimates are derived, and the methods are illustrated and compared with artificial and real data.