Polyceridae

Abstract: In this paper descriptions are given of thirteen species, of which five have already been described from southern Africa. Ten of them belong to the family Polyceridae and three to the Goniodorididae.

Abstract: The use of morphological characters as the basis for species recognition and identification has permitted the development of a consistent taxonomy. However, limitations are evident when dealing with cryptic speciation or when intra-specific variability matches the total inter-species variation. Molecular techniques complement or enhance morphological inference by providing sets of data directly applicable to the taxonomic problem. Cases in which molecular techniques are particularly relevant are those involving larval or juvenile identification for which taxonomic characters are based on adult organisms and also those in which the original taxon description leads to uncertainty over the applicability of the species name. In this paper we report the use of mitochondrial DNA sequence data in a group of nudibranchs to exemplify the two cases mentioned above. The first issue is the longstanding debate on the taxonomic status of Tambja abdere and Tambja fusca, and the second issue is the identification of two juvenile specimens previously considered to represent two different undescribed species of the genus Tambja from the scarcely explored waters of Costa Rica. We also present a preliminary molecular phylogeny of the subfamily Nembrothinae.

Abstract: This work aimed to test whether the colour variability featured by the European nudibranch Polycera quadrilineata is consistent with the concept of a single polychromatic species or may hide multiple lineages. Samples from across the geographic range of P. quadrilineata together with representatives from worldwide species with a focus on Atlantic diversity, were gathered and studied using an integrative taxonomic approach. Morpho-anatomical characters were investigated by light and scanning electron microscopy. Bayesian molecular phylogenetics using MrBayes, the Automatic Barcode Gap Discovery species delimitation method, and haplotype network analysis using the PopArt software were employed to help delimit species using the mitochondrial gene cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI). The results supported the existence of a second species, here described and named Polycera norvegica sp. nov., only known from Norway where it is sympatric with P. quadrilineata. The COI uncorrected p-genetic distance between the two species was estimated at 9.6–12.4%. Polycera norvegica sp. nov. differs by exhibiting a black dotted or patchy dotted pattern occasionally with more or less defined orange/brown patches, but never black continuous or dashed stripes as in P. quadrilineata. The two species share a common colouration with a whitish base and yellow/orange tubercles. Anatomically, P. norvegica sp. nov. has a weaker labial cuticle, a smaller radula with fewer rows, and only four marginal teeth, a reproductive system with a single lobed bursa copulatrix, shorter reproductive ducts, and a penis armed with two kinds of spines: needle-like and hook-shaped penile spines.