Pleomorphic Liposarcoma

Abstract: The clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical features of 63 pleomorphic liposarcomas are presented. There were 35 men and 28 women (median age 63 years; range 18-93 years). Tumor size ranged from 2 to 23 cm (median 10 cm). Tumor locations included lower extremity (36.5%), especially the thigh (28.5%), limb girdles (17.5%), upper extremity (16%), thoracoabdominal wall (9.5%), and internal trunk (20.5%). A total of 75% were deep seated and/or extracompartmental. Histologically, lesions show a varying combination of lipogenic and nonlipogenic areas characterized by malignant fibrous histiocytoma-like, round cell liposarcoma-like, and/or epithelioid/carcinoma-like features. A pericytic pattern was focally present in 15 (24%) tumors. Eighteen (29%) lesions were grade 2, and 45 (71%) were grade 3 sarcomas. Tumor necrosis was observed in 51 (81%) cases, vascular invasion in three, and mitotic counts ranged from 3 to 124 per 10 high power fields (median 25). Lipogenic areas were S-100 protein immunoreactive, at least focally, in 20 of 42 (48%) cases. Nonlipogenic areas showed focal reactivity for smooth muscle actin (24 of 49; 49%), desmin (9 of 48; 19%), CD34 (18 of 45; 40%), S-100 protein (5 of 49, 10%), CD68 (6 of 46, 13%), and epithelial membrane antigen (13 of 49, 26.5%). Epithelioid areas showed epithelial membrane antigen (4 of 11; 36%) but not cytokeratin (0 of 11) reactivity. Treatment procedures in 51 patients consisted of simple tumorectomy (16) and wide excision (33). Five and 31 patients received neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy, respectively. Follow-up (48 patients, range 7-276 months; median 38 months) showed a 45% local recurrence rate and a 42.5% metastasis rate, metastases occurring mostly in lungs and pleura. Seventeen patients (35%) died of disease, of whom none was metastatic at diagnosis. Five-year overall, metastasis-free, and local recurrence-free survivals were 57%, 50%, and 48%, respectively. Patient age > or =60 years, truncal tumor location, deep situation, tumor size >5 cm, vascular invasion, and incomplete tumor excision were significant adverse prognostic factors. Tumor grade and histology did not affect patient outcome. In conclusion, pleomorphic liposarcoma is a rare, often deep-seated and limb-based aggressive and metastasizing neoplasm of late adulthood. It shows a wide range of morphologic appearances, but tumor grade and histology have no effect on patient outcome.

Abstract: Liposarcomas are rare malignant tumors of adipocytic differentiation. The classification of liposarcomas into four principal subtypes reflects the distinct clinical behavior, treatment sensitivity, and underlying biology encompassed by these diseases. Increasingly, clinical management decisions and the development of investigational therapeutics are informed by an improved understanding of subtype-specific molecular pathology. Well-differentiated liposarcoma is the most common subtype and is associated with indolent behavior, local recurrence, and insensitivity to radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Dedifferentiated liposarcoma represents focal progression of well-differentiated disease into a more aggressive, metastasizing, and fatal malignancy. Both of these subtypes are characterized by recurrent amplifications within chromosome 12, resulting in the overexpression of disease-driving genes that have been the focus of therapeutic targeting. Myxoid liposarcoma is characterized by a pathognomonic chromosomal translocation that results in an oncogenic fusion protein, whereas pleomorphic liposarcoma is a karyotypically complex and especially poor-prognosis subtype that accounts for less than 10% of liposarcoma diagnoses. A range of novel pharmaceutical agents that aim to target liposarcoma-specific biology are under active investigation and offer hope of adding to the limited available treatment options for recurrent or inoperable disease.

Abstract: Objectives: Expression of strong nuclear STAT6 is thought to be a specific marker for solitary fibrous tumors (SFTs). Little is known about subtle expression patterns in other mesenchymal lesions. Methods: We performed immunohistochemical studies against the C-terminus of STAT6 in tissue microarrays and whole sections, comprising 2366 mesenchymal lesions. Results: Strong nuclear STAT6 was expressed in 285 of 2,021 tumors, including 206 of 240 SFTs, 49 of 408 well-differentiated/dedifferentiated liposarcomas, eight of 65 unclassified sarcomas, and 14 of 184 desmoid tumors, among others. Expression in SFTs was predominately limited to the nucleus. Other positive tumors typically expressed both nuclear and cytoplasmic STAT6. Complete absence of STAT6 was most common in pleomorphic liposarcoma and alveolar soft part sarcoma (60% and 72% cases negative, respectively). Conclusions: Strong nuclear STAT6 is largely specific for SFTs. Physiologic low-level cytoplasmic/nuclear expression is common in mesenchymal neoplasia and is of uncertain significance.