TL;DR: In preparing the treatment of Dracaena for Flore du Gabon and Flore d’Afrique centrale, a relatively high number of taxonomic and nomenclatural novelties were discovered; these are presented here.
Abstract: In preparing the treatment of Dracaena for Flore du Gabon and Flore d’Afrique centrale, a relatively high number of taxonomic and nomenclatural novelties were discovered; these are presented here. Within Dracaena five species and one forma are described as new, D. bushii, D. haemanthoides, D. marina, D. wakaensis, D. waltersiae and D. laxissima forma aureilicia. Each new species is provided with a full description and taxonomic notes. Apart from that, five species are reinstated, D. braunii, D. nitens, D. perrottetii, D. tholloniana and D. usambarensis. A further 23 names are treated here as a synonym for the first time: D. bequaertii, D. buettneri, D. cuspidibracteata, D. densifolia, D. gabonica, D. gazensis, D. ledermannii, D. letestui, D. litoralis, D. longipetiolata, D. monostachya var. angolensis, D. oddonii, D. perrottetii var. minor, D. poggei, D. pseudoreflexa, D. reflexa var. buchneri, D. rubroaurantiaca, D. soyauxiana, D. talbotii, D. tessmannii, D. usambarensis var. longifolia, D. vanderystii and Pleomele heudelotii, while for four names a neotype and for 14 names a lectotype has been designated. Distribution maps are provided for a total of 23 species. An index of taxon names is included.
TL;DR: More work is needed to resolve internal relationships in the dracaenoids, but a recent proposal to recognise a broadened circumscription of Dracaena that includes Sansevieria is supported.
Abstract: The evolutionary history of the dracaenoid genera Dracaena and Sansevieria (Asparagaceae, Nolinoideae) remains poorly resolved, despite long-recognised issues with their generic boundaries and increased attention paid by both horticulturalists and taxonomists. In this study we aim to: (1) elucidate evolutionary relationships within and between Dracaena and Sansevieria using molecular phylogenetic inference of both nuclear (nDNA) and plastid (cpDNA) markers, (2) examine the infrageneric classifications of each genus, and (3) revise the circumscription of the dracaenoids in light of morphological and phylogenetic evidence. In total, we sampled 21 accessions of Dracaena (ca. 19 species), 27 accessions of Sansevieria (ca. 26 species), and six outgroup taxa. Phylogenetic analyses were based on nucleotide sequences of two non-coding plastid DNA regions, the trnL-F region (trnL intron and trnL-trnF intergenic spacer) and rps16 intron, and the low-copy nuclear region At103. Phylogenetic hypotheses were constructed using maximum parsimony, maximum likelihood, and Bayesian inference. Individual datasets were analysed separately and, after testing for congruence, as combined datasets. We recovered instances of soft incongruence between nDNA and cpDNA datasets in Sansevieria, but general trends in the dracaenoids were congruent, although often poorly supported or resolved. The dracaenoids constitute a strongly supported monophyletic group. Dracaena was resolved as a paraphyletic grade embedded with two clades of Sansevieria, a primary clade comprising most species, and a secondary clade including S. sambiranensis, a distinctive species from Madagascar. The backbone of our phylogeny was only resolved in nDNA analyses, but combined analyses recovered strongly supported species groups. None of the previous infrageneric classifications were supported by our phylogeny, and biogeographic groupings were frequently more significant than morphology. More work is needed to resolve internal relationships in the dracaenoids, but we support a recent proposal to recognise a broadened circumscription of Dracaena that includes Sansevieria. We provide a generic description for the recircumscribed Dracaena and new combinations for several species of Sansevieria in Dracaena.
TL;DR: This study provides the first phylogenetic reconstruction with taxonomic sampling of the Dracaena and Pleomele to resolve their questionable placement and one significant contribution of this research will be in promoting molecular taxonomy to solve problems in systematics.
Abstract: This research focuses on the biodiversity and the evolutionary history of the world-wide medicinal plant genus, Dracaena , and the plant genus Pleomele . The debate concerning the relationship between Dracaena and Pleomele has continued till date - some botanists continue to include Pleomele within Dracaena but others claimed to separate the two genera. Dracaena is a genus comprising of about 40-100 species world wide, mainly in tropics and subtropics, with the exception of America. Pleomele is a genus that has been circumscribed consisting of 10-50 species in Asia. Till date, its center of biodiversity is unknown. Pleomele is only classified well in Hawaii, but confused with Dracaena in the other parts of Asia. Phylogenetic relationship among the 33 taxa within the Dracaena and Pleomele were reconstructed. DNA sequences from the chloroplast DNA intergenic spacer, trnL-trnF and trnH-psbA were analyzed. A phylogeny was reconstructed using neighbor-joining, maximum parsimony in PAUP*, and likelihood criteria in RAxML, and Bayesian inference in MrBayes. The phylogeny with Agave missionum and Agave attenuata as outgroup taxa indicates that Pleomele is mixed with Dracaena . This study provides the first phylogenetic reconstruction with taxonomic sampling of the Dracaena and Pleomele to resolve their questionable placement. The relationships of the climate change adaptation, biogeography, and conservation with the two plant genera will be further discussed in this study. Some suggestions for the benefits of the biodiversity and natural resource conservation in Himalaya regions will be addressed. One significant contribution of this research will be in promoting molecular taxonomy to solve problems in systematics especially in cases when the classification is in debate. Key-words: Phylogeny; chloroplast DNA; Asparagaceae; Dracaena ; Pleomele . DOI: 10.3126/botor.v7i0.4385 Botanica Orientalis – Journal of Plant Science (2010) 7: 64-72
TL;DR: The two endemic species Chrysodracon hawaiiensis and auwahiensis were examined using the molecular technique of random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) and inter simple sequence repeats (ISSR) to determine the genetic structure of the populations and the amount of variation.
Abstract: The genus Chrysodracon has six endemic species in the Hawaii Islands. Chrysodracon hawaiiensis is endemic to Hawaii Island and was described as a distinct species in 1980. It was listed as an endangered species on the International Union for the Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (IUCN) Red List in 1997. This woody plant species was, at one time, common in exposed dry forests, but it became very rare due to grazing pressure and human development. The tree species Chrysodracon auwahiensis (C. auwahiensis), endemic to Maui and Molokai, still has large adult populations in dry lands of the islands, but unfortunately no regeneration from seed has been reported in those areas for many years. The two endemic species were examined using the molecular technique of random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) and inter simple sequence repeats (ISSR) to determine the genetic structure of the populations and the amount of variation. Both species possess similar genetic structure. Larger and smaller populations of both species contain similar levels of genetic diversity as determined by the number of polymorphic loci, estimated heterozygosity, and Shannon’s index of genetic diversity. Although population diversity of Chrysodracon hawaiiensis (C. hawaiiensis) is thought to have remained near pre-disturbance levels, population size continues to decline as recruitment is either absent or does not keep pace with senescence of mature plants. Conservation recommendations for both species are suggested.