TL;DR: A consecutive series of 42 patients with advanced T4M0 epidermoid carcinoma of the esophagus were studied to evaluate the efficacy of various therapeutic modalities, and further evaluate the therapeutic options.
Abstract: Available data concerning the treatment of patients with advanced T4 esophageal carcinoma are limited. A consecutive series of 42 patients with advanced T4M0 epidermoid carcinoma of the esophagus were studied from June 1987 to July 1992. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of various therapeutic modalities, and further evaluate the therapeutic options. The various therapeutic modalities included the following: Group I, feeding jejunostomy or endoesophageal intubation, 6 patients; Group II, palliative subtotal esophagectomy only, 8 patients; Group III, bypass procedures without tumor resection, 9 patients; Group IV, nutritional support and then treatment with irradiation (n=8) or concurrent radio-chemotherapy (n=4), 12 patients; Group V, subtotal esophagectomy, followed by aggressive concurrent radiochemotherapy, 7 patients. The total prescribed irradiation dose was 60 Gy (10 Gy/5 fractions/week). A combination regimen of chemotherapy consisted of cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin (PFL regimen). For the patients undergoing esophagectomy or bypass procedures (n=24), the rates of operative complication and mortality were 45.8% and 25%, respectively. Side effects of adjuvant therapy (n=24) consisted of main airway irritation (100%), mucositis or gastrointestinal symptoms (83.3%), hematologic toxicity (79.2%), esophagitis or gastric ulcer (62.5%), alopecia (37.5%), and pneumonia (20.8%). The mortality due to toxicity of adjuvant therapy was 21.1% (4/19 patients). The mean survival times for each of the different groups was 1.9+/-0.5 months for Group I, 4.8+/-1.6 months for Group II, 5.2+/-1.2 months for Group III, 7.3+/-2.0 months for Group IV, and 20.3+/-2.5 months for Group V, respectively. Compared with patients of Groups I--IV, the Group V patients had a significantly superior one-year survival rate (P<0.01). Our results demonstrated that esophagectomy followed by concurrent irradiation and PFL combination chemotherapy may provide a significant improvement in the quality of life and survival for appropriate patients with advanced T4M0 epidermoid carcinoma of the esophagus. Furthermore, more than one cycle of PFL regimen chemotherapy may result in a better prognosis. During the performance of such an aggressive treatment, the utmost care must be taken with the patient's nutrition and to prevent pulmonary complications.
TL;DR: PFL induction chemotherapy produced only a modest complete response rate, possibly due to suboptimal dose intensity, and was associated with substantial, although not life-threatening, toxicity.
Abstract: Purpose To determine the efficacy of the combination of cisplatin, fluorouracil, and high-dose l-leucovorin (PFL) as organ-preserving induction therapy followed by radiotherapy in untreated patients with advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Patients and methods This was a phase II study of PFL in 47 patients with resectable stage III (n = 20) and IV (n = 27) M0 squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck, including larynx (n = 20), hypopharynx (n = 14), and oropharynx (n = 13). The PFL regimen consisted of cisplatin 25 mg/m2 on days 1 through 5, fluorouracil 800 mg/m2 CI on days 2 through 6, and l-leucovorin 250 mg/m2 on days 1 through 6, all by continuous intravenous infusion every 21 to 28 days for three courses. The primary study endpoint was initial response to and local disease control rate with PFL as induction chemotherapy, with an aim to confirm the previously reported complete response rate of 60% to 70%. Results Of 47 patients enrolled, 46 were evaluable for response to PFL, 14 (30%) achieved a complete response, and 25 (54%) achieved a partial response, for an overall response rate of 84%. Of 39 patients evaluable for response after radiation therapy, 27 (69%) achieved a complete response and 11 (28%) a partial response. Local disease control was achieved in 37 of 46 (80%). Grade 3 or 4 toxic effects occurred frequently, with neutropenia in 27 (59%) of 46 evaluable patients, thrombocytopenia in 30%, mucositis in 41%, diarrhea in 13%, and nausea/ vomiting in 13%, but there were no treatment-related deaths. With a median follow-up of 35 months there have been nine recurrences (four local/regional and five distant) and 17 deaths (12 in patients with disease progression and five not directly related to the primary tumor). Second primary tumors have developed in six patients. At 3 years 62% of the patients remain alive with no disease progression, and the 3-year survival estimate with preserved organ function is 66%. Conclusion PFL induction chemotherapy produced only a modest complete response rate, possibly due to suboptimal dose intensity, and was associated with substantial, although not life-threatening, toxicity. Newer regimens and treatment modalities are still needed in the management of advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.
TL;DR: Continuous infusion of Cisplatin, 5‐fluorouracil, and leucovorin forms the basis of the PFL regimen and maximizes the potential for synergistic interaction.
Abstract: BACKGROUND Cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin (PFL) have demonstrated synergistic activity in preclinical models. Continuous infusion of these agents maximizes the potential for synergistic interaction and forms the basis of the PFL regimen. METHODS Sixty-one patients with advanced (Stages IIIB and IV) non-small cell lung cancer were entered into the study. Thirty-one were treated with cisplatin 25 mg/m2/day on days 1-5, 5-fluorouracil 800 mg/m2/day on days 2-6, and calcium leucovorin 500 mg/m2/day on days 1-6. Because of severe mucositis, the final 30 patients were treated with the same dosage of cisplatin but with the deletion on day 6 of leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil. Cycles were repeated every 28 days. Response was assessed after two cycles. Responding patients received an additional two cycles. Patients with Stage IIIB disease received radiation therapy to the mediastinum and sites of involved disease. RESULTS PFL had an overall response rate of 41%. Median survival was 8.1 months, and median time to treatment failure was 4.2 months. Importantly, 68% (17 of 25) of responses were maximal after just two cycles of chemotherapy. Notable toxicities included mucositis (43% > or = Grade 3) and myelosuppression. Response, time to failure, or survival did not differ between the two schedules. Mucositis was less severe with 4-day PFL. CONCLUSIONS PFL as given in this manner is an active regimen for the treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. The rapidity of response makes it a regimen for incorporation into protocols for Stage IIIA disease. A neoadjuvant study using PFL is underway.
TL;DR: Piritrexim (PTX) is a MTX-analogue with single agent activity in head and neck cancer that requires no active transportation and may be able to overcome transport-related MTX resistance.
Abstract: Studies in head and neck cancer at the University of Chicago have focused on the biochemical modulation of 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) This has included the addition of high dose oral Leucovorin to the combination of Cisplatin and continuous infusion 5-FU (PFL) After establishing the pattern of toxicities, the recommended doses, and the efficacy of PFL in recurrent and/or metastatic disease [1], we treated patients with locally advanced disease with this PFL regimen and identified a high degree of activity [2, 3] Piritrexim (PTX) is a MTX-analogue with single agent activity in head and neck cancer [4] Since it is lipid soluble, it requires no active transportation and, therefore, may be able to overcome transport-related MTX resistance In this phase II study, we added MTX and PTX to the PFL regimen (PFL-MP) hoping to further increase its activity