TL;DR: The history of cinchona has traditionally begun with the romantic - and now discredited - story of Francisca Henriquez Ribera, the Countess of Chinchon.
Abstract: The history of cinchona has traditionally begun with the romantic - and now discredited - story of Francisca Henriquez Ribera, the Countess of Chinchon. According to legend, the Countess became seriously ill during an outbreak of fever in Lima around 1623. Her husband, the Viceroy, learning of a medicinal tree bark used by the local Indians, ordered the bark tested and administered to his wife. Following her prompt recovery, the countess championed the use of bark among the general populace, and thousands of lives were saved. The drug became known as "pulvis Comitissae", the powder of the Countess, and later - misspelled by Linnaeus - as "cinchona". In "Quinine's Predecessor", Saul Jarcho unravels a tangle of myth, hearsay and fact to establish the definitive history of cinchona bark - the still-important source of modern quinine. Jarcho explains the discovery of the healing property of the substance, also known as the Peruvian bark or Jesuits' bark, and traces the routes by which it was transmitted from South America to Spain and other countries. He recounts the controversy and resistance surrounding its acceptance by medical practitioners. And he offers the most complete account to date of the important work of Francesco Torti, who used the bark successfully in treating cerebral and other especially dangerous malarial infections.
TL;DR: A short history of the use of Cinchona in the exploration of dangerous malarial areas and in this way facilitated imperial expansion by the Western powers can be found in this paper.
Abstract: On of the most compelling sagas in the history of medicine and therapeutics is the emergence of the Peruvian bark (Cinchona) and also of the pharmacologically active substance derived from it, quinine. Its discovery involved exploration, exploitation and secrecy, and it came, in the nineteenth century, to reflect the struggles of the major European powers for domination, territory and profit. This short history shows how the use of Cinchona enabled the exploration of dangerous malarial areas and in this way facilitated imperial expansion by the Western powers.
TL;DR: The history of Peruvian bark can only be understood as the interplay of its trajectories in science, commerce, and society, and Paris is focused on as the location where medical and public appreciation of the bark took shape by exploring several contexts of knowledge circulation and medical practice there.
Abstract: The history of the introduction of exotic therapeutic drugs in early modern Europe is usually rife with legend and obscurity and Peruvian bark is a case in point. The famous antimalarial drug entered the European medical market around 1640, yet it took decades before the bark was firmly established in pharmaceutical practice. This article argues that the history of Peruvian bark can only be understood as the interplay of its trajectories in science, commerce, and society. Modern research has mostly focused on the first of these, largely due to the abundance of medico-historical data. While appreciating these findings, this article proposes to integrate the medical trajectory in a richer narrative, by drawing particular attention to the acculturation of the bark in commerce and society. Although the evidence we have for these two trajectories is still sketchy and disproportionate, it can nevertheless help us to make sense of sources that have not yet been an obvious focus of research. Starting from an apparently isolated occurrence of the drug in a letter, this article focuses on Paris as the location where medical and public appreciation of the bark took shape, by exploring several contexts of knowledge circulation and medical practice there. These contexts provide a new window on the early circulation of knowledge of the bark, at a time when its eventual acceptance was by no means certain.
TL;DR: Markham as discussed by the authors described the gradual steps by which during the past twenty years this success has been reached, enabling us to fully share the satisfaction with which they must have been written.
Abstract: Abstract“THE enterprise undertaken by me in 1859 of introducing the cultivation of Peruvian bark trees into British India and Ceylon is now an assured success.” With these words Mr. Markham begins his preface, and a perusal of the convenient history he has put together of the gradual steps by which during the past twenty years this success has been reached, enables us to fully share the satisfaction with which they must have been written. Not merely has a cheap supply of febrifuge alkaloids been brought within reach of the fever-haunted population of India, but a new and highly-profitable industry has been opened to the planters of our tropical colonies, and the yield of an inestimable drug placed beyond risk of exhaustion.Peruvian Bark: a Popular Account of the Introduction of Chinchona Cultivation into British India.By Clements R. Markham. 1860–1880. (London: John Murray, 1880.)
TL;DR: Four examples illustrate how ‘clinical experiments’ with the bark were made during the last third of the 18th century: in a hospital, the army, the navy and finally in private practice.
Abstract: From the late seventeenth century onwards, in vitro and animal
experimentation, chemical tests and microscopical observation, and the
analysis of single case histories were used to understand the pharmacology
and therapeutic properties of the Peruvian bark. Four examples illustrate how
“clinical experiments” with the bark were made during the last third of the
eighteenth century: in a hospital, the army, the navy, and finally in private
practice.