TL;DR: The subperiosteal rhytidectomy is excellent and appears more natural for rejuvenation of the upper and central face, eyebrows, periorbita, external canthus, cheeks, and nasolabial fold.
Abstract: A harmonious facial appearance is determined by a balanced relationship among all tissues of the face. With advancing age, balance is lost among the bone, muscle, fat, and skin as progressive changes occur in their volume, shape, position, and consistency. Study of clinical cases and fresh cadaver dissections has led to better understanding of the superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS) and its relationship with the facial muscles and their bony insertions. From these anatomic studies we have developed an improved concept of rhytidectomy with the subperiosteal detachment of all soft tissues from the orbit, upper maxilla, malar bone, and nose. Following this detachment, the soft tissues of the cheek, forehead, jowls, nasolabial folds, lateral canthus, and eyebrows can be lifted to reestablish their youthful relationship with the underlying skeleton. Our 4-year experience includes 105 patients. Sixty percent of these patients were admitted to the hospital and had their procedure under general anesthesia; forty percent, however, had their procedure in an outpatient setting requiring only local anesthesia (lidocaine hydrochloride 1% plus epinephrine) and intravenous sedation (midazolam, ketamine). Complications have been minimal except for temporary paralysis of the frontal nerve in seven patients; guidelines for prevention have subsequently been developed. The subperiosteal rhytidectomy is excellent and appears more natural for rejuvenation of the upper and central face, eyebrows, periorbita, external canthus, cheeks, and nasolabial fold.
TL;DR: The author presents an overview of his personal view of the concepts relating to the aging upper periorbita and discusses his experiences with this procedure.
Abstract: The surgical approach to rejuvenation of the periorbita continues to evolve with the application of procedures that are safe and effective with a greater sensitivity of aesthetics. Most of the topics in the recent literature discuss improvements with techniques relating to the lower eyelid and midface. Improved surgical techniques of the upper periorbita have been mostly limited to advances in brow lifting. The most common and traditional approach to upper blepharoplasty has remained essentially unchanged and has not considered, to the same degree as in the lower periorbita, the actual changes that occur with age or more accurate surgical approaches toward rejuvenation. The author presents an overview of his personal view of the concepts relating to the aging upper periorbita and discusses his experiences with this procedure.
TL;DR: Microvascular free‐tissue transfer is the best option for repair of defects following orbital exenteration and total maxillectomy, although an obturator still has a role in selected patients.
Abstract: Malignant ethmoid and maxillary sinus tumors frequently involve the orbit. Orbital involvement is an important prognostic predictor of recurrence-free, disease-specific, and overall survival. Most authors agree that orbital preservation as opposed to orbital exenteration or clearance does not result in significant differences in local recurrence or actuarial survival. The eye can be safely preserved in most patients with ethmoid or maxillary sinus cancer invading the orbital wall, including malignancies that invade the orbital soft tissues with penetration through the periorbita provided that they can be completely dissected away from the orbital fat. Malposition of the globe and nonfunctional eyes frequently result when patients have not had adequate rigid reconstruction of the orbital floor, particularly if they have received postoperative radiotherapy. This underscores the importance of such reconstruction. Isolated defects following orbital exenteration may be reconstructed with a temporalis muscle flap. Microvascular free-tissue transfer is the best option for repair of defects following orbital exenteration and total maxillectomy, although an obturator still has a role in selected patients.
TL;DR: It is believed that aggressive removal of the orbital/sphenoid intraosseous tumor is critical for a favorable visual outcome and tumor control and satisfactory cosmetic results can be achieved with simple reconstruction techniques as described.
Abstract: Object The aim of this study was to describe the surgical technique used for removal of sphenoorbital meningiomas in the authors' practice and to review the operative outcome. Methods Review of the senior author's practice between 1994 and 2009 revealed 39 patients (mean age 48 years) eligible for this study. Clinical presentation, surgical technique, postoperative outcome, and follow-up data are presented. Surgical technique is detailed, with an emphasis on aggressive removal consisting of drilling of the hypertrophied sphenoid bone, orbital wall, and anterior clinoid process, followed by tumor removal and a wide resection of the involved dura. A simple dural closure without reconstruction of the orbital roof or the lateral wall of the orbit is also described. Results Gross-total resection was achieved in 15 cases (38.5%), near-total resection with small residual in the cavernous sinus or periorbita in 20 cases (51.3%), and subtotal resection in 4 cases (10.3%). Postoperative complications included trige...
TL;DR: The data suggest that sparing of the soft tissues of the orbit when the periorbita has not been transgressed by SCC does not downgrade the rate of cure or local control.
Abstract: Objective/hypothesis The treatment of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the sinonasal tract has evolved from routine exenteration of the orbital contents to sparing of the orbit when the SCC does not transgress the periorbita. Nonetheless, the influence of this change in treatment over the rate of local recurrence or survival has not been clearly elucidated. The objective was to ascertain whether orbital sparing surgery for the treatment of SCC of the paranasal sinuses influences the rate of local recurrence or survival. Study design This is a retrospective study of patients presenting with SCC arising in the sinonasal tract, treated primarily at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center from 1977 to 1990, including meta-analysis of the English literature regarding SCC of the sinonasal tract. Methods Review of medical records regarding demographics, histology, extension of tumor, pathologic results, type of surgery, adjunctive therapy, and outcome. Articles for meta-analysis were identified by Medline search and cross-referencing. Results Fifty-eight patients with orbital invasion, including bone and/or soft tissue invasion, were included in the study. Patients presenting with invasion of the bony orbit without soft tissue invasion were treated with maxillectomy and/or ethmoidectomy, sparing the orbital contents. Patients presenting with invasion of the orbital bones and soft tissues were treated with ethmoidectomy or maxillectomy, including orbital exenteration. At 3 years' follow-up, 52% of the patients whose orbit was exenterated were alive and without evidence of disease, compared with 59% of the patients whose orbit was spared. This difference was not statistically significant. Similarly, the rate of local recurrence was not statistically significant (P > .05). A meta-analysis of the literature revealed similar results. Conclusions Our data suggest that sparing of the soft tissues of the orbit when the periorbita has not been transgressed by SCC does not downgrade the rate of cure or local control.