About: Penmanship is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 194 publications have been published within this topic receiving 1661 citations. The topic is also known as: penmanship & ✍️.
TL;DR: In this article, the shifting functions and meanings of handwriting in America are explored, ranging from colonial times to the present, in which people looked to handwriting as both a lesson in conformity and a talisman of individuality.
Abstract: Copybooks and the Palmer method, handwriting analysis and autograph collecting-these words conjure up a lost world, in which people looked to handwriting as both a lesson in conformity and a talisman of individuality. In this engaging history, ranging from colonial times to the present, Tamara Plakins Thornton explores the shifting functions and meanings of handwriting in America. Script emerged in the eighteenth century as a medium intimately associated with the self, says Thornton, in contrast to the impersonality of print. But thereafter, just what kind of self would be defined or revealed in script was debated in the context of changing economic and social realities, definitions of manhood and womanhood, and concepts of mind and body. Thornton details the parties to these disputes: writing masters who used penmanship training to form and discipline character; scientific experts who chalked up variations in script to mere physiological idiosyncrasy; and autograph collectors and handwriting analysts who celebrated signatures that broke copybook rules as marks of personality, revealing the uniqueness of the self. In our time, concludes Thornton, when handwriting skills seem altogether obsolete, calligraphy revivals and calls for old-fashioned penmanship training reflect nostalgia and the rejection of modernity.
TL;DR: Variability in both the spatial and temporal domains of instances of the same letter throughout the text was greater among the dysgraphic handwriters in comparison to the variability among the proficient handwriters.
TL;DR: A review of major research in light of GRE Board concerns can be found in this paper, where the authors investigate the nature and limitations of essay and multiple-choice tests of writing ability, the statistical relationship of performances on these types of tests, the performance of population subgroups on each kind of task, the possible need of different disciplines for different tests of composition skill, and the cost and usefulness of various strategies for evaluating writing ability.
Abstract: The assessment of writing ability has recently recevied much attention from educators, legislators, and measurement experts, especially because the writing of students in all disciplines and at all educational levels seems, on the whole, less proficient than the writing produced by students five or ten years ago. The GRE Research Committee has expressed interest in the psychometric and practical issues that pertain to the assessment of writing ability. This paper presents not a new study but a review of major research in light of GRE Board concerns. Specifically, recent scholarship and information from established programs are used to investigate the nature and limitations of essay and multiple-choice tests of writing ability, the statistical relationship of performances on these types of tests, the performance of population subgroups on each kind of task, the possible need of different disciplines for different tests of composition skill, and the cost and usefulness of various strategies for evaluating writing ability.
The literature indicates that essay tests are often considered more valid than multiple-choice tests as measures of writing ability. Certainly they are favored by English teachers. But although essay tests may sample a wider range of composition skills, the variance in essay test scores can reflect such irrelevant factors as speed and fluency under time pressure or even penmanship. Also, essay test scores are typically far less reliable than multiple-choice test scores. When essay test scores are made more reliable through multiple assessments, or when statistical corrections for unreliability are applied, performance on multiple-choice and essay measures can correlate very highly. The multiple-choice measures, though, tend to overpredict the performance of minority candidates on essay tests. It is not certain whether multiple-choice tests have essentially the same predictive validity for candidates in different academic disciplines, where writing requirements may vary. Still, at all levels of education and ability, there appears to be a close relationship between performance on multiple-choice and essay tests of writing ability. And yet each type of measure contributes unique information to the overall assessment. The best measures of writing ability have both essay and multiple-choice sections, but this design can be prohibitively expensive. Cost cutting alternatives such as an unscored or locally scored writing sample may compromise the quality of the essay assessment. For programs considering an essay writing exercise, a discussion of the cost and uses of different scoring methods is included. The holistic method, although having little instructional value, offers the cheapest and best means of rating essays for the rank ordering and selection of candidates.
Abstract: The Gillingham method may be used with individuals or small groups. In this multisensory phonics technique, students first learn the sounds of letters, and then build these letter-sounds into words. Students use visual, auditory, and kinesthetic associations to help themselves remember the concepts in three different ways: for example, if their visual memory of a letter is weak, the feel of writing the letter or saying it aloud can assist their recall.
TL;DR: In this paper, a portable pen pointing device and a processing system with pen pointing devices can be easily used, and the processor body interprets a writing sample on the basis of the user's specific penmanship/handwriting information supplied from the portable pointing device through the pen interface unit thereof.
Abstract: A portable pen pointing device and a processing system with pen pointing device which can be easily used. The portable pen pointing device includes a memory for storing user's specific penmanship/handwriting information and a pen interface unit for supplying the user's specific penmanship/handwriting information to a processor body of the processing system. The processor body interprets a writing sample on the basis of the user's specific penmanship/handwriting information supplied from the portable pen pointing device through the pen interface unit thereof. With this construction, there is no need to read information from a storage medium such as a flexible disk in which a user's specific dictionary for penmanship/handwriting interpretation is written. Also, an operation of establishing a certain writing environment becomes unnecessary or easy.