About: Pathological lying is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 68 publications have been published within this topic receiving 1034 citations. The topic is also known as: severe intentional lying & mythomania.
TL;DR: The authors examine the extent to which a person can control lying behavior and the related question of whether pathological liars have responsibility for their actions and conclude that further systematic research is needed to resolve the questions raised.
Abstract: Although pathological lying was first described in the medical literature over 100 years ago, it remains a poorly understood concept. Psychiatrists continue to grapple with the full ramifications of the condition, even though interest specifically in pathological lying seems to have waned in recent times. The impact of pathological lying deserves critical attention from forensic psychiatrists because of the implications that untruths have in a legal context. In this article, the authors review the considerable vagueness and confusion that has surrounded this concept and examine the extent to which a person can control lying behavior and the related question of whether pathological liars have responsibility for their actions. While providing a structured framework for considering pathological lying in the forensic context, the authors conclude that further systematic research is needed to resolve the questions raised in this article.
TL;DR: Seven examples of a syndrome described originally by Asher and associated with the name of Baron Munchausen are reported, and the observation that three of these patients may have sustained brain damage prior to the commencement of their hospital addiction is of particular interest.
Abstract: Seven examples of a syndrome described originally by Asher and associated with the name of Baron Munchausen are reported. These patients spent much of their lives in hospitals with fictitious symptoms that were usually dramatic, indulged in pathological lying (pseudologia phantastica) and submitted to repeated unnecessary operations and protracted investigations. The term Munchausen Syndrome is considered inappropriate in that it implies that these cases form a distinct clinical entity, refers only to their pseudologia and confers ridicule upon them, so “The Syndrome of Hospital Addiction” has been proposed as an alternative title to this paper since it is not open to these objections.
The principal features of the syndrome have been described and tabulated. The observation that three of these patients may have sustained brain damage prior to the commencement of their hospital addiction is of particular interest, since this may have provided an organic basis for their aberrant behaviour.
Motivation is largely unknown, but recognition that these patients are mentally rather than physically ill is required, so that they may be given treatment to prevent them from destroying themselves. Further research is necessary, directed to ascertaining the natural history of the disease, providing a better understanding of the personality disorder and improving methods of psychiatric treatment for this condition.
Following conviction before a criminal court, legal machinery now exists to detain a patient suffering from this syndrome for a prolonged period in a specified mental hospital (27). Under these circumstances it is suggested that the provisions of the Mental Health Act should be applied wherever possible to future cases, so that they may be admitted to psychiatric hospitals for investigation and treatment. In view of their tendency to abscond from “open door” mental hospitals, admission to a special security hospital (28) may enable therapy to be more effectively administered.
TL;DR: A chronic somatoform disorder or factitious disorder (or both) was detected in almost two-thirds of the participants and over half of the mothers exhibited pathological lying, in some dating from adolescence, and this often continued into adult life eventually involving the child in a web of deceit and abuse.
Abstract: Background Munchausen's syndrome by proxy (recently renamed fabricated or induced illness) is a rare form of child abuse, but relatively little is known about the psychopathology of the perpetrators. Aims To examine the medical, psychiatric, social work and forensic records of mothers referred for detailed psychiatric assessment from 1996 to 2009. Method Twenty-eight consecutive individuals with a putative diagnosis of fabricated or induced illness were referred to the authors for detailed psychiatric assessment and recommendations about management (25 from family courts). We scrutinised all medical and psychiatric records and interviewed them, as well as informants. Results In total, 16 (57%) had evidence of a current somatoform disorder, and factitious disorders (either past or current) were identified in 18 (64%): 11 participants had both somatoform and factitious disorders. Nine participants (32%) had non-epileptic attacks. We found evidence of pathological lying (pseudologia fantastica) in 17 (61%) of the participants; in some there were key links between early abusive experiences, the development of pathological lying and the eventual fabrication of illness in the child victim. Conclusions A chronic somatoform disorder or factitious disorder (or both) was detected in almost two-thirds of the participants. Over half of the mothers exhibited pathological lying, in some dating from adolescence, and this often continued into adult life eventually involving the child in a web of deceit and abuse. Psychiatrists whose work brings them into contact with women with chronic somatoform or factitious disorders, especially if there is evidence of lying from an early age, should always be alert to the impact of these illnesses on any dependent children.
TL;DR: A procedure to study deception in the non-pathological state using functional neuroimaging would only appear to be ethical when subjects volunteer to participate, as might occur during the investigation of alleged miscarriages of justice.
Abstract: Lying is ubiquitous and has acquired many names. In 'natural experiments', both pathological lying and truthfulness implicate prefrontal cortices. Recently, the advent of functional neuroimaging has allowed investigators to study deception in the non-pathological state. Prefrontal cortices are again implicated, although the regions identified vary across experiments. Forensic application of such technology (to the detection of deceit) requires the solution of tractable technical problems. Whether we 'should' detect deception remains an ethical problem: one for societies to resolve. However, such a procedure would only appear to be ethical when subjects volunteer to participate, as might occur during the investigation of alleged miscarriages of justice. We demonstrate how this might be approached.
TL;DR: This review is to provide clinicians with an appreciation of the clinical features of psychopathy, an understanding of the structural and functional derangements and the genetic and environmental factors which serve as the basis for the development of Psychopathy and a summary of published reports of pharmacological approaches to the management of this disorder.
Abstract: Summary
What is known and objective
Psychopathy is a personality disorder characterized by deficits in personality and behaviour. Personality deficits are marked by interpersonal and affective facets, including pathological lying, grandiose sense of self-worth, lack of remorse and callousness. Behavioural deficits are defined by lifestyle and antisocial deficits, including impulsivity, parasitic lifestyle and poor behavioural controls. The objective of this review is to provide clinicians with (i) an appreciation of the clinical features of psychopathy, (ii) an understanding of the structural and functional derangements and the genetic and environmental factors which serve as the basis for the development of psychopathy and (iii) a summary of published reports of pharmacological approaches to the management of this disorder.
Methods
A literature search of MEDLINE/PubMed (1966–present) was conducted using the MeSH search terms psychopathy and antisocial personality disorder alone and in combination with the subheading drug therapy. Additional databases included Web of Science (1945–present) and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (1970–present) using the text words psychopath and antisocial personality were searched. A search of Amazon books using the search terms psychopathy and sociopathy was also performed. Bibliographies of relevant articles were searched for additional citations. All data sources in English were considered for inclusion. For background information, broad subject headings were searched for review articles first. Human and animal drug therapy articles were evaluated giving preference to those papers using a controlled trial methodology.
Results and Discussion
Psychopathy is a personality disorder characterized by a lack of conscience, pathologic lying, manipulative behaviour and often superficial charm. The incidence of psychopathy in the general population is generally considered to be 0·6–4% with a higher proportion of males to females. Brain imaging studies of psychopaths suggest a smaller and less active amygdala and prefrontal cortex. There also appear to be physiological derangements in psychopathy, including alterations/dysregulation in neurotransmitter homeostasis (dopamine and serotonin), altered endocrine responses (testosterone and cortisol) and altered autonomic responses to emotional stimuli and stressors. Although both genetic and environmental factors likely contribute to the developmental basis of psychopathy, these factors are poorly understood at present. To date, limited studies with pharmacologic interventions in psychopathy are available and there are insufficient trials to determine efficacy.
What is new and conclusion
Psychopathy is a serious personality disorder with profound negative effects on individuals and society. To design rational therapeutic strategies for this disorder, additional research is needed to discover the specific pathological and pathophysiological basis of psychopathy and to further elucidate the genetic and environmental factors responsible for psychopathic development. There is emerging evidence of phenotypic variants in psychopathy, including successful and unsuccessful types. It is important for clinicians to be cognizant of the psychopathic personality.