About: Palaeochannel is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 328 publications have been published within this topic receiving 6251 citations. The topic is also known as: paleochannel.
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors propose a sedimentary-architecture descriptive scheme that distinguishes elements from two stages of channel-fill development; (i) the abandonment stage with initial proximal fill, and (ii) the subsequent fully abandoned palaeochannel that collects distal fill.
TL;DR: In this article, the geometry, flow, and sedimentary processes of the different channel patterns form a continuum, such that similarities between their deposits are more significant than differences, and the following criteria are considered useful: 1) proportion of channel fills relative to lateral-accretion deposits, which increases with degree of braiding; 2) mean grain size of channel fill relative to LAC deposits; 3) paleocurrent variance, which may indicate sinuosity; and 4) bankfull discharge, slo e, and width/depth of paleochannels throughout the channel belt
Abstract: Interpretation of paleochannel patterns from ancient alluvium involves reconstruction of sinuosity and degree of braiding. It is emphasized here that the geometry, flow, and sedimentary processes of the different channel patterns form a continuum, such that similarities between their deposits are more significant than differences. While many commonly cited sedimentary criteria for distinguishing channel patterns are shown to be invalid, the following are considered useful: 1) proportion of channel fills relative to lateral-accretion deposits, which increases with degree of braiding; 2) mean grain size of channel fills relative to lateral-accretion deposits, which decreases with increasing sinuosity; 3) paleocurrent variance, which may indicate sinuosity; and 4) bankfull discharge, slo e, and width/depth of paleochannels throughout the channel belt, as long as they can be quantitatively reconstructed from channel-bar and channel-fill deposits. Utilization of these criteria requires examination of completely preserved sections of channel belts and overbank deposits in large outcrops. Presently existing facies models do not convey the diversity of different channel types and facies; those that are not three-dimensional and lack scales and paleocurrent information are of limited value.
TL;DR: In this paper, a Holocene alluvial archive of 506 dated units for Great Britain is analysed in terms of the sedimentation styles involved, and the database is classified by sedimentation unit (channel sediments, palaeochannel fills, floodplain surface sedimentiments, floodbasins and colluvial deposits).
TL;DR: In this article, the geometry, flow, and sedimentary processes of the different channel patterns form a continuum, such that similarities between their deposits are more significant than differences, and the following criteria are considered useful: proportion of channel fills relative to lateral-accretion deposits, which increases with degree of braiding.
Abstract: Interpretation of paleochannel patterns from ancient alluvium involves reconstruction of sinuosity and degree of braiding. It is emphasized here that the geometry, flow, and sedimentary processes of the different channel patterns form a continuum, such that similarities between their deposits are more significant than differences. While many commonly cited sedimentary criteria for distinguishing channel patterns are shown to be invalid, the following are considered useful: 1) proportion of channel fills relative to lateral-accretion deposits, which increases with degree of braiding; 2) mean grain size of channel fills relative to lateral-accretion deposits, which decreases with increasing sinuosity; 3) paleocurrent variance, which may indicate sinuosity; and 4) bankfull discharge, slope, and width/depth of paleochannels throughout the channel belt, as long as they can be quantitatively reconstructed from channel-bar and channel-fill deposits. Utilization of these criteria requires examination of completely preserved sections of channel belts and overbank deposits in large outcrops. Presently existing facies models do not convey the diversity of different channel types and facies; those that are not three-dimensional and lack scales and paleocurrent information are of limited value.
TL;DR: In this paper, a comparison between the Laingsburg flood deposits and fluvial sandstones of the Permian Lower Beaufort in the southwestern Karoo region of South Africa is made.