TL;DR: The aim of the study was to assess the prevalence of malocclusion in a population of Bogotanian children and adolescents in terms of different degrees of severity in relation to sex and specific stages of dental development, in order to evaluate the need for orthodontic treatment in this part of Colombia.
Abstract: SUMMARY The aim of the study was to assess the prevalence of malocclusion in a population of Bogotanian children and adolescents in terms of different degrees of severity in relation to sex and specific stages of dental development, in order to evaluate the need for orthodontic treatment in this part of Colombia. A sample of 4724 children (5‐17 years of age) was randomly selected from a population that attended the Dental Health Service; none had been orthodontically treated. Based on their dental stages the subjects were grouped into deciduous, early mixed, late mixed and permanent dentition. The registrations were performed according to a method by Bjork et al. (1964). The need for orthodontic treatment was evaluated according to an index used by the Swedish National Board of Health. The results showed that 88 per cent of the subjects had some type of anomly, from mild to severe, half of them recorded as occlusal anomalies, one-third as space discrepancies, and one-fifth as dental anomalies. No clear sex differences were noted, except for maxillary overjet, spacing, tooth size (all more frequent in boys), and crowding (more frequent in girls). Occlusal anomalies and space discrepancies varied in the different dental developmental periods, as did tipped and rotated teeth. Little need for orthodontic treatment was found in 35 per cent and moderate need in 30 per cent. A great need was estimated in 20 per cent, comprising children with prenormal occlusion, maxillary overjet, or overbite (>6 mm), posterior unilateral crossbite with midline deviation (>2 mm), severe crowding or spacing, congenitally missing maxillary incisors, impacted maxillary canines or anterior open bite (>3 mm in the permanent dentition). Urgent need for treatment was estimated to be 3 per cent, comprising subjects with extreme postand pre-normal occlusion, impacted maxillary incisors or extensive aplasia.
TL;DR: The purpose of this study was to determine whether it would be possible to identify pretreatment factors that will allow the clinician to predict the incidence, location, and severity of root resorption before the commencement of orthodontic treatment.
TL;DR: The dental casts of 65 untreated normal occlusions were evaluated to determine the nature and extent of the developmental maturation process of the normal dentition and changes showed decreases in arch length and intercanine width; minimal overall changes in intermolar width, overjet, and overbite; and increases in incisor irregularity.
TL;DR: It was concluded that resorption on maxillary incisors after ectopic eruption of the maxillary canines is a more common phenomenon than previously reported and has to be considered in all cases with seriously diverging eruption of maxillaryCanines.
Abstract: The purpose of the study was to analyze the extent and prevalence of resorption of maxillary incisors after ectopic eruption of the maxillary canines in a sample of subjects referred to an orthodontic specialist clinic for consultation. The subjects consisted of 107 children, 39 boys and 68 girls, between 9 and 15 years of age (mean 12.5 years), with 156 ectopically and 58 normally erupting maxillary canines. All children were subjected to a basic clinical and intraoral radiographic investigation. These radiographs were supplemented with computerized tomography (CT) of the upper alveolar bones in order to get more precise information on the positions and relationships between the maxillary canines and adjacent incisors and to evaluate resorptions on the roots of the incisors. The results showed that, relative to the roots of the adjacent incisors, the crowns of 21% the ectopically positioned canines were located to the buccal, 18% to the distobuccal, 27% to the lingual, 23% to the distolingual, 5% apically and 6% between the central and lateral incisors. Ninety-three percent of the ectopically positioned canines were in contact with the roots of the adjacent lateral incisor and 19% were in contact with the central incisor. The corresponding figures for the normally erupting canines were 49%. Resorptions on the roots of the incisors adjacent to the ectopically positioned canine occurred in 38% of the laterals and in 9% of the centrals. The resorptions were graded and tended to be extensive. Among the 58 resorbed lateral incisors, resorptions were slight in 31%, moderate in 9%, and severe with pulpal involvement in 60%. The corresponding figures for the 14 resorbed centrals were 36%, 21%, and 43%, respectively. About 60% of the resorptions involved the middle and apical thirds, the tip of the apex not included. On the sides with normally erupting canines, 3 lateral maxillary incisors were slightly or moderately resorbed distally. In all, 51 of the 107 subjects with ectopically erupting maxillary canines (48%) had resorbed maxillary incisors during the eruption of the maxillary canines. There were statistically significant correlations between ectopic eruption of the maxillary canine, contacts between the teeth and resorptions on the adjacent incisors. It was concluded that resorption on maxillary incisors after ectopic eruption of the maxillary canines is a more common phenomenon than previously reported and has to be considered in all cases with seriously diverging eruption of maxillary canines. It was also concluded that the resorptions of the roots of the incisors were caused by pressure during the eruption of the adjacent, aberrant canine. Finally, it was shown that CT scanning substantially increased the detection of root resorptions on incisors adjacent to ectopically erupting maxillary canines (about 50%). The sensitivity of intraoral films was low when diagnosing the resorptions, being calculated to 0.68.
TL;DR: Evaluating the reliability of the OrthoCAD system showed a statistically significant difference between the 2 groups for tooth size and overbite, with the digital measurements smaller than the manual measurements.