TL;DR: To discover the true dinoflagellate species diversity in the Mexican Pacific, more studies on the athecate Gymnodiniales species, benthic and epiphytic dinof lagellates, the ‘‘Diplopsalis group’’, the genus Protoperidinium and recently described genera of the family Podolampadaceae are needed.
Abstract: An annotated checklist of about 605 principally free-living dinoflagellate species and infraspecific taxa from 91 genera reported from the Mexican Pacific is presented on the basis of published literature, some theses, unpublished reports, and original data. Literature references from 1878 to 2005 (in total, 311) are included in the bibliography, and taxonomic notes in regard to some taxa are given, where appropriate. The presence of illustrations divided into three categories (line drawings, light micrographs and scanning electronic micrographs) in the cited works is indicated as well as the known distribution of the taxa in the Mexican Pacific. The nomenclature is brought up to date, and 193 species and infraspecific taxa are accompanied with original comments. Four new combinations are proposed: Histioneis pieltainii (B. F. Osorio) Okolodkov comb. nov., Latifascia subantarctica (Balech) Okolodkov comb. nov., Peridiniella globosa (P. A. Dang.) Okolodkov comb. nov. and Protoperidinium curtipes (Jorg.) Balech f. asymmetricum (Matzen.) Okolodkov comb. nov. Twentynine nomina nuda were revealed. The leading genera are Protoperidinium (111 species), Ceratium (63) Dinophysis (41), Gonyaulax (25), Oxytoxum (22), Gymnodinium (22), Prorocentrum (21), Alexandrium (17) Ornithocercus (12) and Amphidinium (12). To discover the true dinoflagellate species diversity in the Mexican Pacific, more studies on the athecate Gymnodiniales species, benthic and epiphytic dinoflagellates, the ‘‘Diplopsalis group’’, the genus Protoperidinium and recently described genera of the family Podolampadaceae, are needed.
TL;DR: This study provides the first insight into the phylogenetic diversity of the symbiotic cyanobacteria of open ocean protists.
Abstract: A reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) method was developed for amplifying prokaryotic symbiont rRNA sequences from individual marine planktonic eukaryotic host cells belonging to the tintinnid genus Codonella, the spongiose radiolarian genus Dictyocoryne, and several Dinophysoid genera (Amphisolenia, Citharistes, Dinophysis, Histioneis, Ornithocercus). Of the 93 sequences obtained from 67 clone libraries, 26% were most similar to a variety of heterotrophic bacteria and 4% were most similar to plastids. Most (70%) of the sequences had the greatest similarity to cyanobacterial 16S rRNA sequences. Several (10%) of these had low sequence identity ( 96% identical) to Synechococcus sp., and three were >99% identical to Prochlorococcus sp. Subgroups of sequences most similar to Synechococcus sp. were derived from multiple host types, indicating that the same symbiont was capable of forming an association with a variety of host organisms. Sixteen libraries yielded two or three divergent (from 2% to 25% different) sequence types, indicating the presence of mixed assemblages in single host cells. This study provides the first insight into the phylogenetic diversity of the symbiotic cyanobacteria of open ocean protists.
TL;DR: Representatives of the genera Ornithocercus, His-tioneis and Citharistes have been investigated and shown to possess at least two and possibly three distinct forms of symbiotic cyanobacteria.
Abstract: The pigmented phaeosomes noted by earlier observers have been confirmed as cyanobacteria, following examination in the electron microscope. Representatives of the genera Ornithocercus, His-tioneis and Citharistes have been investigated and shown to possess at least two and possibly three distinct forms of symbiotic cyanobacteria. The structure of these organisms and their position within the host organism have been examined, and the nature of the relationship discussed. In the genus Amphisolenia a further, distinct species of cyanobacterium was observed as an internal symbiont A. globifera. In A. thrinax and A. bidentata two other symbiotic organisms were seen, one an entire eucaryotic cell and the other a bacterium. The significance of these various associations is considered.
TL;DR: The molecular phylogeny supported monophyly of Histioneis and Citharistes and showed the genus Dinophysis to be polyphyletic and in need of a taxonomic revision, and proposed to reinstate the genus Phalacroma.
Abstract: Almost 80 years ago, a radiation scheme based on structural resemblance was first outlined for the marine order Dinophysiales. This hypothetical radiation illustrated the relationship between the dinophysioid genera and included several independent, extant lineages. Subsequent studies have supplied additional information on morphology and ecology to these evolutionary lineages. We have for the first time combined morphological information with molecular phylogenies to test the dinophysioid radiation hypothesis in a modern context. Nuclear-encoded LSU rDNA sequences including domains D1-D6 from 27 species belonging to Dinophysis Ehrenb., Ornithocercus F. Stein, Phalacroma F. Stein, Amphisolenia F. Stein, Citharistes F. Stein, and Histioneis F. Stein were obtained from the Indian Ocean. Previously, LSU rDNA has only been determined from one of these. In Bayesian analyses, Amphisolenia formed a long basal clade to the other dinophysioids. These diverged into two separate lineages, the first comprised species with a classical Phalacroma outline, also including the type species P. porodictyum F. Stein. Thus, we propose to reinstate the genus Phalacroma. The relationship between the genera in the second lineage was not well resolved. However, the molecular phylogeny supported monophyly of Histioneis and Citharistes and showed the genus Dinophysis to be polyphyletic and in need of a taxonomic revision. Species of Ornithocercus grouped with Citharistes, but this relationship remained unresolved. The phylogenetic trees furthermore revealed convergent evolution of several morphological characters in the dinophysioids. According to the molecular data, the dinophysioids appeared to have evolved quite differently from the radiation schemes previously hypothesized. Four dinophysioid species had identical LSU rDNA sequences to other well-established species.
TL;DR: The number of species found in this study is relatively low, but certain species of Dinophysis, reported in previous papers, do not seem to occur in Mexican waters, as their distribution is rather limited to the Mediterranean Sea and the North Atlantic, respectively.
Abstract: Despite a recent revision of the dinoflagellates of the order Dinophysiales on Mexican coasts and a checklist of dinoflagellates from the Mexican Pacific, many records still need to be confirmed, for there are very few reliable illustrations and/or descriptions. In this paper, species composition and distribution of dinoflagellates belonging to the Dinophysiales, the product of the analysis of net phytoplankton material collected from coasts of the tropical Mexican Pacific (Jalisco to Chiapas) are presented. The material has been studied using light microscopy, although a few species were also studied by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Forty-one species from five genera were identified, with two new records annotated for the Mexican Pacific: Amphisolenia thrinax and Metaphalacroma skogsbergii, and two new species of the genus Amphisolenia, Amphisolenia fusiformis sp. nov. and Amphisolenia michoacana sp. nov. Illustrations, dimensions and distribution data are provided for each species, and descriptions of the new species are also given. Amphisolenia palmata, A. rectangulata, A. truncata, Dinophysis apicata, D. hindmarchii, Histioneis biremis, H. crateriformis, H. pulchra, Ornithocercus cristatus, O. heteroporoides and O. orbiculatus are illustrated for the first time in the waters of the Mexican Pacific. The number of species found in this study is relatively low. The species Dinophysis norvegica and D. sacculus, reported in previous papers, do not seem to occur in Mexican waters, as their distribution is rather limited to the Mediterranean Sea and the North Atlantic, respectively. Finally, the identity of certain species of Dinophysis and the nature of the new species described here are discussed.