About: Opposition (politics) is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 20639 publications have been published within this topic receiving 350832 citations. The topic is also known as: opposition.
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors apply categories developed in the classic literature on political opposition to the developing European Union and show that the EU has not yet developed the third great milestone identified by Dahl in his analysis of the path to democratic institutions.
Abstract: This paper applies categories developed in the classic literature on political opposition to the developing European Union. It is clear that the EU has never developed the third great milestone identified by Dahl in his analysis of the path to democratic institutions. That is, we still lack the capacity to organize opposition within the European polity. This failure to allow for opposition within the polity is likely to lead either (a) to the elimination of opposition altogether, or (b) to the mobilization of an opposition of principle against the EU polity. This problem is also beginning to reach down into the domestic sphere, in that the growing weight of the EU, through its indirect impact on national politics, helps to encourage domestic democratic deficits, hence limiting the scope for classical opposition at the national level. Here too, then, we might expect to see either the elimination of opposition or the mobilization of a new – perhaps populist – opposition of principle.
TL;DR: The Database of Political Institutions (DBIS) as mentioned in this paper is a large cross-country database of political institutions that covers 177 countries over 21 years, 1975-95, and includes several measures of checks and balances, tenure and stability, identification of party affiliation with government or opposition, and fragmentation of opposition and government parties in the legislature.
Abstract: This article introduces a large new cross-country database, the Database of Political Institutions. It covers 177 countries over 21 years, 1975-95. The article presents the intuition, construction, and definitions of the different variables. Among the novel variables introduced are several measures of checks and balances, tenure and stability, identification of party affiliation with government or opposition, and fragmentation of opposition and government parties in the legislature.
TL;DR: The literature on public attitudes to wind power is underpinned by key assumptions which limit its scope and restrict the findings it can present as discussed by the authors, such as: (1) The majority of the public supports wind power; (2) Opponents are ignorant or misinformed; (3) The reason for understanding opposition is to overcome it.
TL;DR: In the 1990s, the secret-police chief Montesinos systematically undermined all the democratic checks and balances with bribes, including the judiciary, a free press, and the news media as mentioned in this paper.
Abstract: Which of the democratic checks and balances--opposition parties, the judiciary, a free press--is the most forceful? Peru has the full set of democratic institutions. In the 1990s, the secret-police chief Montesinos systematically undermined them all with bribes. We quantify the checks using the bribe prices. Montesinos paid a televisionchannel owner about 100 times what he paid a judge or a politician. One single television channel's bribe was five times larger than the total of the opposition politicians' bribes. By revealed preference, the strongest check on the government's power was the news media.
TL;DR: The authors analyzed the determinants of opposition to biotechnology and pharmaceutical patents granted by the European Patent Office (EPO) between 1978 and 1996 and found that 8.6% of the patents are attacked in opposition proceedings.