NIP

Abstract: The synthesis and properties of 4-hydroxy-3-iodo-5-nitrophenylacetic acid (NIP) and several related compounds are described. Conjugates of NIP with proteins are prepared from the azide, synthesized from commercial 4-hydroxy-phenylacetic acid. Sera from rabbits and mice immunized with NIP—ovalbumin or NIP—chicken serum globulin bind N131IP-containing compounds, as judged from precipitation of radioactivity by salting-out of immunoglobulins. Homogeneous binding is obtained with N131IP—polylysine, N131IP—e-amino-n-caproic acid (N131IP—aminocap), and other structurally related haptens; non-homogeneous binding is obtained with N131IP—bovine serum albumin. Binding to salt-precipitated immunoglobulin of N131IP—aminocap, the hapten of choice for this purpose, provides an assay for antibody measurable at concentrations down to at least M-9 serum binding capacity (∼0.1 μg antibody/ml). Structurally related compounds and NIP—protein conjugates competitively inhibit binding of N131IP—aminocap. The inhibitions indicate that the iodine contained in NIP, but not the carrier protein, contributes significantly to the binding site.

Abstract: Major intrinsic proteins (MIPs) are a diverse class of integral membrane proteins that facilitate the transport of water and some small solutes across cellular membranes. X-ray structures of MIPs indicate that a tetrad of residues (the ar/R region) form a narrow pore constriction that constitutes the selectivity filter. In comparison with mammalian and microbial species, plants have a greater number and diversity of MIPs with greater than 30 genes encoding four phylogenetic subfamilies with eight different classes of ar/R sequences. The nodulin 26-like intrinsic protein (NIP) subfamily in Arabidopsis can be subdivided into two ar/R subgroups: the NIP subgroup I, which resembles the archetype of the family, soybean nodulin 26, and the NIP subgroup II, which is represented by the Arabidopsis protein AtNIP6;1. These two NIPs differ principally by the substitution of a conserved alanine (NIP subgroup II) for a conserved tryptophan (NIP subgroup I) in the helix 2 position (H2) of the ar/R filter. A comparison of the water and solute tranport properties of the two proteins was performed by expression in Xenopus laevis oocytes. Nodulin 26 is an aquaglyceroporin with a modest osmotic water permeability (P(f)) and the ability to transport uncharged solutes such as glycerol and formamide. In constrast, AtNIP6;1 showed no measurable water permeability but transported glycerol, formamide, as well as larger solutes that were impermeable to nodulin 26. By site-directed mutagenesis, we show that the H2 position is the crucial determinant that confers these transport behaviors. A comparison of the NIPs and tonoplast-intrinsic proteins (TIP) shows that the H2 residue can predict the transport profile for water and glycerol with histidine found in TIP-like aquaporins, tryptophan found in aquaglyceroporins (NIP I), and alanine found in water-impermeable glyceroporins (AtNIP6;1).

Abstract: In the current paradigm for molecular imprinting, the imprinted binding sites exist as a consequence of the polymerization process around templates, and the properties of nonimprinted polymers (NIPs) have largely been overlooked. Thus, nothing can be affirmed a priori concerning the binding properties of NIPs. We propose an alternative view where the imprinting effect is due to the presence of a template molecule that enhances the pre-existing binding properties of a polymer. If a NIP shows no binding properties toward a target molecule, the corresponding imprinted polymer (MIP) will show a weak imprinting effect. On the other hand, if a NIP shows binding properties toward a target molecule, the corresponding MIP will show a significant imprinting effect. To verify this hypothesis, we prepared a 96-member combinatorial polymeric library in the absence of any template molecule. This library was screened for several potential ligands, and with no exceptions, the composition of the best-binding NIP produced a MIP with excellent binding properties, whereas a low-binding NIP formulation produced a MIP with comparable low binding. To validate these results, the binding properties toward naproxen and ibuprofen were measured for two combinatorial libraries of polymers prepared in the presence (MIP library) and the absence (NIP library) of the template molecule. The experiment's results showed a correlation between the apparent affinity constants measured for the NIP and MIP libraries, confirming the proposed hypothesis. Moreover, for closely related molecules, it was shown that binding selectivity is an emergent property derived from the imprinting process and not a property of NIPs.

Abstract: The low-activity, phosphorylated form of nitrate reductase (NR) became activated during purification from spinach (Spinacia oleracea) leaves harvested in the dark. This activation resulted from its separation from an approximately 110-kd nitrate reductase inhibitor protein (NIP). Readdition of NIP inactivated the purified phosphorylated NR, but not the active dephosphorylated form of NR, indicating that the inactivation of NR requires its interaction with NIP as well as phosphorylation. Consistent with this hypothesis, NR that had been inactivated in vitro in the presence of NR kinase, ATP-Mg, and NIP could be reactivated either by dephosphorylation with protein phosphatase 2A or by dissociation of NIP from NR.