TL;DR: Observations on active geckos during their natural period of nocturnal activity allow comparison of many aspects of the ecologies of 12 species, including habitat and microhabitat requirements, diets, daily and seasonal patterns of activity, body temperature relationships, reproduction, predation and broken tail frequencies.
Abstract: Observations on active geckos during their natural period of nocturnal activity allow comparison of many aspects of the ecologies of 12 species, including habitat and microhabitat requirements, diets, daily and seasonal patterns of activity, body temperature relationships, reproduction, predation and broken tail frequencies. Because as many as nine species, including five congeneric Diplodactylus, occur together on a single study site, emphasis is placed upon ecological differences that might reduce competition and allow coexistence of such a diversity of nocturnal species. Only slight differences in temporal patterns of activity are evident. However, foods eaten as well as habitats and microhabitats exploited differ strikingly among these gekkonids. Larger species tend to eat larger prey than smaller species. Three species are food specialists, eating essentially nothing but termites. Three others are distinctly arboreal, with the majority of specimens first sighted off the ground. Two species are semi-arboreal, one of which is restricted almost entirely to Triodia grass tussocks. Due to clear-cut differences in habitat requirements, three large terrestrial species of Nephrurus are always allopatric; one is restricted to sandridges, another to sandplain-Triodia habitats, and still another to shrub-Acacia habitats. In general, sympatric species pairs with high dietary overlap tend to overlap relatively little in microhabitat and vice versa.
TL;DR: The Diplodactylinae are divided into two tribes primarily on the basis of differences in the arrangement and number of preanal pores and the size and shape of the nasal process of the premaxilla.
Abstract: Each of the 14 genera now referred to the subfamily Diplodactylinae (Naultinus, Hoplodactylus, Heteropholis, Bavayia, Rhacodactylus, Eurydactylodes, Pseudothecadactylus, Carphodactylus, Phyllurus, Nephrurus, Oedura, Diplodactylus, Rhynchoedura, and Crenadactylus) is characterized on the basis of its internal and external morphology. The type species, referred species, and distribution are given for each genus. The Diplodactylinae are divided into two tribes primarily on the basis of differences in the arrangement and number of preanal pores and the size and shape of the nasal process of the premaxilla. The Carphodactylini includes Naultinus, Hoplodactylus, Heteropholis, Bavayia, Rhacodactylus, Eurydactylodes, Carphodactylus, Pseudothecadactylus, Phyllurus, and Nephrurus. The Diplodactylini includes Diplodactylus, Oedura, Rhynchoedura, and Crenadactylus. The Carphodactylini appear to be more primitive than the Diplodactylini. Carphodactylus may be close to the ancestral stock of the subfamily. Phyllurus and Nephrurus seem to be closely related to Carphodactylus. Pseudothecadactylus is considered to be closely related to the New Caledonia-Loyalty Islands radiation, which consists of Eurydactylodes and Rhacodactylus, and probably Bavayia. The New Zealand genera Hoplodactylus, Heteropholis, and Naultinus seem to form a natural group which is related to the New Caledonian genera. Crenadactylus is probably only distantly related to the other genera of the Diplodactylini. Rhynchoedura seems to be related to the stenodactylus group of Diplodactylus, while Oedura shows an affinity to the strophurus group of that genus. Geographically, the Diplodactylinae is restricted to the Australian Region (Australia, New Caledonia, Loyalty Islands, and New Zealand). The ancestral stock of the subfamily probably originated in south-east Asia and dispersed toward Australia by way of the Indo-Australian Archipelago during the upper Cretaceous. It is postulated that the subfamily reached Australia (and continental New Guinea) by Palaeocene- Eocene time.
TL;DR: It is suggested that aggregative behaviour in Nephrurus milii has evolved to provide facultative control over rates of thermal exchange, an advantage because Nephruru are large, live in cool variable climates, and occupy retreat-sites that experience highly variable thermal regimes.
Abstract: Unusually among lizards, Australian thick-tailed geckos (Nephrurus milii) aggregate in their diurnal retreat-sites. They continue to do this in the laboratory, even when excess shelters are available. We manipulated cues available to captive lizards to investigate three putative advantages to aggregation: enhanced social interactions, avoidance of predators, and control over rates of heat or water flux. Trials in which we prevented physical contact with conspecifics eliminated the aggregative response, suggesting that chemical and visual cues alone do not stimulate aggregation. Adding the scent of a predatory snake did not modify the degree of aggregation, nor did changes in mean ambient temperature or humidity. However, geckos exposed to decreasing temperatures huddled more closely with each other within shelters, and huddled geckos heated and cooled more slowly than did similar-sized solitary animals. We suggest that aggregative behaviour in Nephrurus milii has evolved to provide facultative control over rates of thermal exchange, an advantage because Nephrurus are large, live in cool variable climates, and occupy retreat-sites (rock crevices with high exposure to solar radiation) that experience highly variable thermal regimes. These attributes are shared by another group of lizards, the scincid genus Egernia, that exhibit the most complex sociality yet described among squamate reptiles. The initial stimulus for group formation in both geckos and skinks may have been thermal control, preadapting the scincids to further elaboration of social behaviour.
TL;DR: It is demonstrated how mark-recapture analysis can show the causes of animal fire responses while realistically accounting for detectability, and is necessary to provide a predictive framework to guide fire management for biodiversity.
TL;DR: Diurnal aggregations of two species of nocturnally-active gekkonid lizards from two widely-separated localities in southern Australia are gathered to clarify the processes that stimulate aggregation, and to suggestive of the kinds of processes that determine group size and composition.
Abstract: Although reptiles of many species are often found in aggregations within retreat- sites, there is little quantitative information on the size and composition of such aggregations. Such data may clarify the processes that stimulate aggregation, and that determine patterns of co-occur- rence of individuals with respect to sex and body size. We gathered data on diurnal aggregations (under rocks) of two species of nocturnally-active gekkonid lizards (the gekkonine Christinus mar- inoratus and the diplodactyline Nephrurus tnilii) from two widely-separated localities in southern Australia (central Victoria and an island off the southern coast of Western Australia). Both species occurred at these localities, but geographic variation was evident in mean adult body sizes and in sexual size dimorphism. Both species actively aggregated, and the composition of groups differed significantly from that expected under a model of random assortment. For example, adult felnales of N. milii were rarely found with juvenile conspecifics, whereas pairs of juveniles were common. Most groups of C. marmoratus contained only a single adult male. In N. milii, members of an aggregation tended to resemble each other in body size. These significantly non-random patterns within aggregations of gekkonid lizards are suggestive of the kinds of processes that determine group size and composition, but experimental studies are needed to verify the causal factors involved.