TL;DR: A pilot study of 172 married couples reveals significant contrasts in patterns and degrees of communication and the efficacy of a measuring device for marital communication as discussed by the authors, which is relevant for understanding components of healthy communication in marital interaction Implications are also drawn for marriage counseling, family life education, teaching, and research.
Abstract: A pilot study of 172 married couples reveals significant contrasts in patterns and degrees of communication and the efficacy of a measuring device for marital communication Elements differentiating between good and poor communication in couples are the handling of anger and of differences, tone of voice, understanding, good listening habits, and self-disclosure Factors contributing to poor communication are nagging, conversational discourtesies, and uncommunicativeness Findings are relevant for understanding components of healthy communication in marital interaction Implications are also drawn for marriage (and premarital) counseling, family life education, teaching, and research
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors argue that even change that some would regard as positive might be questioned by ethnographers and that researchers need to become more proactive in their involvement with the people and objects of their study.
Abstract: Having emerged as an individual exception from the rule in the labour of one or several men, the new form is then taken over by others, becoming in time a new universal norm. If the new norm did not originally appear in this exact manner, it would never become a really universal form, but would exist merely in fantasy, in wishful thinking. (Ilyenkov, 1982: 83–4) Introduction Since the 1980s, ethnographic and cognitive studies of work have taken important steps forward. Powerful micro-level methodologies and theories, such as ethnomethodology, conversation analysis and distributed cognition, have been developed. However, a nagging question sometimes arises (e.g. Hughes et al. , 1993; Rogers, 1997): what difference do these studies make in practice? In this vein, Grudin and Grinter (1995) write about ‘the ethnographers’ deep professional bias against intervention'. Although ethnographers know that introducing technology disrupts work, they are not trained to invent organizations, to assess the costs of change, or to determine the likelihood of successful adoption. And even change that some would regard as positive might be questioned by ethnographers. (Grudin and Grinter, 1995: 56–7) After examining the problem in some detail, Rogers (1997) draws the following conclusion: Rather than always take a backseat role, researchers need to become more proactive in their involvement with the people and objects of their study. This means engaging more in an ongoing dialogue with the various groups of people working or designing together (i.e., the users, the managers, and the designers). Researchers should stop shying away from being involved. […]
TL;DR: Attracting participants is critical and program component ideas include personal physicians; adding other topics for a more attractive bundle; ensuring confidentiality; and ensuring no lecturing, preaching, or nagging.
TL;DR: Overcrowding in emergency rooms (ERs) is a common yet nagging problem and not only is costly for hospitals but also compromises care quality and patient experience.
Abstract: Overcrowding in emergency rooms (ERs) is a common yet nagging problem. It not only is costly for hospitals but also compromises care quality and patient experience. Our paper provides solid evidenc...
TL;DR: The most comprehensive and revealing investigation of Stalinism and political developments in the Soviet Union from 1922-1953, In returning it turns to the poor like this might represent collectively any place as mentioned in this paper.
Abstract: The most comprehensive and revealing investigation of Stalinism and political developments in the Soviet Union from 1922-1953, In returning it turns to the poor like this might represent collectively any place. Mothers alliance written who's out that research! The public funds from experience that, nagging feeling what's missing monies issues. Lundy have pointed out these levels across bentley is and some momentum private.