About: Multivariate cryptography is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 174 publications have been published within this topic receiving 8990 citations.
TL;DR: The central challenge in post-quantum cryptography is to meet demands for cryptographic usability and flexibility without sacrificing confidence.
Abstract: Quantum computers will break today's most popular public-key cryptographic systems, including RSA, DSA, and ECDSA. This book introduces the reader to the next generation of cryptographic algorithms, the systems that resist quantum-computer attacks: in particular, post-quantum public-key encryption systems and post-quantum public-key signature systems. Leading experts have joined forces for the first time to explain the state of the art in quantum computing, hash-based cryptography, code-based cryptography, lattice-based cryptography, and multivariate cryptography. Mathematical foundations and implementation issues are included. This book is an essential resource for students and researchers who want to contribute to the field of post-quantum cryptography.
TL;DR: It is provided strong evidence that relinearization and XL can solve randomly generated systems of polynomial equations in subexponential time when m exceeds n by a number that increases slowly with n.
Abstract: The security of many recently proposed cryptosystems is based on the difficulty of solving large systems of quadratic multivariate polynomial equations. This problem is NP-hard over any field. When the number of equations m is the same as the number of unknowns n the best known algorithms are exhaustive search for small fields, and a Grobner base algorithm for large fields. Grobner base algorithms have large exponential complexity and cannot solve in practice systems with n ≥ 15. Kipnis and Shamir [9] have recently introduced a new algorithm called "relinearization". The exact complexity of this algorithm is not known, but for sufficiently overdefined systems it was expected to run in polynomial time.
In this paper we analyze the theoretical and practical aspects of relinearization. We ran a large number of experiments for various values of n and m, and analysed which systems of equations were actually solvable. We show that many of the equations generated by relinearization are linearly dependent, and thus relinearization is less efficient that one could expect. We then develop an improved algorithm called XL which is both simpler and more powerful than relinearization. For all 0 < ∈ ≤ 1/2, and m ≥ ∈n2, XL and relinearization are expected to run in polynomial time of approximately nO(1/√Ɛ). Moreover, we provide strong evidence that relinearization and XL can solve randomly generated systems of polynomial equations in subexponential time when m exceeds n by a number that increases slowly with n.
TL;DR: Two new families of Asymmetric Algorithms that so far have resisted all attacks, if properly used: Hidden Field Equations (HFE) and Isomorphism of Polynomials (IP) are presented.
Abstract: In [6] T. Matsumoto and H. Imai described a new asymmetric algorithm based on multivariate polynomials of degree two over a finite field, which was subsequently broken in [9]. Here we present two new families of Asymmetric Algorithms that so far have resisted all attacks, if properly used: Hidden Field Equations (HFE) and Isomorphism of Polynomials (IP). These algorithms can be seen as two candidate ways to repair the Matsumoto-Imai Algorithm. HFE can be used to do signatures, encryption or authentication in an asymmetric way, with very short signatures and short encryptions of short messages. IP can be used for signatures and for zero knowledge authenticatinn.
An extended version of this paper can be obtained from the author. Another way to repair the Matsumoto-Imai Algorithm will be presented in [10].
TL;DR: It is shown that for C* it is practically infeasible to extract the n-tuple of n-variate polynomials representing the inverse of the corresponding public key.
Abstract: This paper discusses an asymmetric cryptosystem C* which consists of public transformations of compIerity O(m2n3) and secret transformations of complexity O((mn)2(m + logn)), where each complexity is measured in the total number of bit-operations for processing an mn-bit message block. Each public key of C* is an n-tuple of quadratic n-variate polynomials over GF(2m) and can be used for both verifying signatures and encrypting plaintexts. This paper also shows that for C* it is practically infeasible to extract the n-tuple of n-variate polynomials representing the inverse of the corresponding public key.
TL;DR: It is shown that (in characteristic 2) when v ≥ n2, finding a solution is generally easy and it is very easy to combine the Oil and Vinegar idea and the HFE schemes of [14], and the resulting scheme, called HFEV, looks at the present also very interesting both from a practical and theoretical point of view.
Abstract: In [16], J. Patarin designed a new scheme, called "Oil and Vinegar", for computing asymmetric signatures. It is very simple, can be computed very fast (both in secret and public key) and requires very little RAM in smartcard implementations. The idea consists in hiding quadratic equations in n unknowns called "oil" and v = n unknowns called "vinegar" over a finite field K, with linear secret functions. This original scheme was broken in [10] by A. Kipnis and A. Shamir. In this paper, we study some very simple variations of the original scheme where v > n (instead of v = n). These schemes are called "Unbalanced Oil and Vinegar" (UOV), since we have more "vinegar" unknowns than "oil" unknowns. We show that, when v ≃ n, the attack of [10] can be extended, but when v ≥ 2n for example, the security of the scheme is still an open problem. Moreover, when v ≃ n2/2, the security of the scheme is exactly equivalent (if we accept a very natural but not proved property) to the problem of solving a random set of n quadratic equations in n2/2 unknowns (with no trapdoor). However, we show that (in characteristic 2) when v ≥ n2, finding a solution is generally easy. Then we will see that it is very easy to combine the Oil and Vinegar idea and the HFE schemes of [14]. The resulting scheme, called HFEV, looks at the present also very interesting both from a practical and theoretical point of view. The length of a UOV signature can be as short as 192 bits and for HFEV it can be as short as 80 bits.