TL;DR: The multiplicative calculus as discussed by the authors is a calculus that combines the roles of subtraction and addition to division and multiplication, and it can be seen as a generalization of the integral calculus.
TL;DR: The non-Newtonian calculus as discussed by the authors provides a wide variety of mathematical tools for use in science, engineering, and mathematics, and it appears to have considerable potential for use as alternatives to the classical calculus of Newton and Leibniz.
Abstract: The non-Newtonian calculi provide a wide variety of mathematical tools for use in science, engineering, and mathematics. They appear to have considerable potential for use as alternatives to the classical calculus of Newton and Leibniz. There are infinitely many non-Newtonian calculi. Like the classical calculus, each of them possesses (among other things): a derivative, an integral, a natural average, a special class of functions having a constant derivative, and two Fundamental Theorems which reveal that the derivative and integral are 'inversely' related. Nevertheless, many non-Newtonian calculi are markedly different from the classical calculus. For example, infinitely many non-Newtonian calculi have a nonlinear derivative or integral. Among these calculi are the geometric calculus, bigeometric calculus, harmonic calculus, biharmonic calculus, quadratic calculus, and bi-quadratic calculus. Furthermore, in the geometric calculus and in the bigeo-metric calculus, the derivative and integral are both multiplicative. (Please see the " Multiplicative Calculus " section of this website.) Of course in the classical calculus, the linear functions are the functions having a constant derivative. However, in the geometric calculus, the exponential functions are the functions having a constant derivative. And in the bigeomet-ric calculus, the power functions are the functions having a constant derivative. (The geometric derivative and the bigeometric derivative are closely related to the well-known logarithmic derivative and elasticity, respectively.) The well-known arithmetic average (of functions) is the natural average in the classical calculus, but the well-known geometric average is the natural average in the geometric calculus. And the well-known harmonic average and quadratic average (or root mean square) are closely related to the natural averages in the harmonic and quadratic calculi, respectively. * NonNewtonianCalculus created: 2013-03-2 by: smithpith version: 41754 Privacy setting: 1 Topic 26A06 00-02 † This text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License 3.0. You can reuse this document or portions thereof only if you do so under terms that are compatible with the CC-BY-SA license.
TL;DR: In this article, the authors show that various problems from different fields can be modeled more efficiently using multiplicative calculus, in place of Newtonian calculus, and they recommend that further research into this field be vested to exploit the applicability of multiplicative algebra in different fields as well as the development of multiplier calculus concepts.
Abstract: This work is aimed to show that various problems from different fields can be modeled more efficiently using multiplicative calculus, in place of Newtonian calculus. Since multiplicative calculus is still in its infancy, some effort is put to explain its basic principles such as exponential arithmetic, multiplicative calculus, and multiplicative differential equations. Examples from finance, actuarial science, economics, and social sciences are presented with solutions using multiplicative calculus concepts. Based on the encouraging results obtained it is recommended that further research into this field be vested to exploit the applicability of multiplicative calculus in different fields as well as the development of multiplicative calculus concepts.
TL;DR: The use of multiplicative calculus in biomedical image analysis has been discussed in this paper, where the authors advocate the use of an alternative calculus known as multiplicative (a.k.a. non-Newtonian) calculus, which provides a natural framework in problems in which positive images or positive definite matrix fields and positivity preserving operators are of interest.
Abstract: We advocate the use of an alternative calculus in biomedical image analysis, known as multiplicative (a.k.a. non-Newtonian) calculus. It provides a natural framework in problems in which positive images or positive definite matrix fields and positivity preserving operators are of interest. Indeed, its merit lies in the fact that preservation of positivity under basic but important operations, such as differentiation, is manifest. In the case of positive scalar functions, or in general any set of positive definite functions with a commutative codomain, it is a convenient, albeit arguably redundant framework. However, in the increasingly important non-commutative case, such as encountered in diffusion tensor imaging and strain tensor analysis, multiplicative calculus complements standard calculus in a truly nontrivial way. The purpose of this article is to provide a condensed review of multiplicative calculus and to illustrate its potential use in biomedical image analysis.
TL;DR: Some fundamental theorems and concepts of the classical calculus are interpreted from the view point of the MCC and the analogies between them are given.
Abstract: A multiplicative calculus dealing with real valued functions is extended to a multiplicative type complex calculus (MCC) dealing with complex valued functions. Some fundamental theorems and concepts of the classical calculus are interpreted from the view point of the MCC and the analogies between them are given. Also new notations for the MCC are defined. The MCC is distinguished from the classical calculus by calling the classical calculus as the additive type complex calculus (ACC).