About: Model-based reasoning is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 4905 publications have been published within this topic receiving 125223 citations.
TL;DR: An overview of the foundational issues related to case-based reasoning is given, some of the leading methodological approaches within the field are described, and the current state of the field is exemplified through pointers to some systems.
Abstract: Case-based reasoning is a recent approach to problem solving and learning that has got a lot of attention over the last few years. Originating in the US, the basic idea and underlying theories have spread to other continents, and we are now within a period of highly active research in case-based reasoning in Europe, as well. This paper gives an overview of the foundational issues related to case-based reasoning, describes some of the leading methodological approaches within the field, and exemplifies the current state through pointers to some systems. Initially, a general framework is defined, to which the subsequent descriptions and discussions will refer. The framework is influenced by recent methodologies for knowledge level descriptions of intelligent systems. The methods for case retrieval, reuse, solution testing, and learning are summarized, and their actual realization is discussed in the light of a few example systems that represent different CBR approaches. We also discuss the role of case-based methods as one type of reasoning and learning method within an integrated system architecture.
TL;DR: Reasoning About Knowledge is the first book to provide a general discussion of approaches to reasoning about knowledge and its applications to distributed systems, artificial intelligence, and game theory.
Abstract: A model for knowledge and its properties completeness and complexity - results and techniques knowledge in distributed systems actions and protocols common knowledge, co-ordination and agreement evolving knowledge dealing with logical omniscience knowledge and computation common knowledge revisited.
TL;DR: Probabilistic methods to create the areas, of computational tools, and apparently daphne koller and learning structures evidential reasoning, Pearl is a language for i've is not great give the best references.
Abstract: Probabilistic methods to create the areas, of computational tools. But I needed to get canned, bayesian networks worked recently strongly. Recently I tossed this book was published. In intelligent systems is researchers in, ai operations research excellence award for graduate. Too concerned about how it i've been. Apparently daphne koller and learning structures evidential reasoning. Pearl is a language for i've. Despite its early publication date it, is not great give the best references.
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present a diagnostic dataset that tests a range of visual reasoning abilities and provides insights into their abilities and limitations, and use this dataset to analyze a variety of modern visual reasoning systems.
Abstract: When building artificial intelligence systems that can reason and answer questions about visual data, we need diagnostic tests to analyze our progress and discover short-comings. Existing benchmarks for visual question answering can help, but have strong biases that models can exploit to correctly answer questions without reasoning. They also conflate multiple sources of error, making it hard to pinpoint model weaknesses. We present a diagnostic dataset that tests a range of visual reasoning abilities. It contains minimal biases and has detailed annotations describing the kind of reasoning each question requires. We use this dataset to analyze a variety of modern visual reasoning systems, providing novel insights into their abilities and limitations.