About: Miniature Postsynaptic Potentials is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 56 publications have been published within this topic receiving 1696 citations.
TL;DR: It was thought of interest to examine the action of trains of nerve volleys, and of botulinum toxin, by means of intracellular electrodes, on partly curarized junctions because of the possibility appeared that repetitive nerve volley might also exert their effects equally far peripherally.
Abstract: In a previous communication (Brooks, 1954) it was suggested that type A botulinum toxin acts on motor nerve filaments, proximal to the site of release of acetylcholine (ACh). This conclusion was based mainly on two consistent findings: (1) no end-plate potentials (e.p.p.'s) were found on the surfaces of end-plate regions of whole muscles when neuromuscular transmission ceased, and (2) direct stimulation of blocked neuromuscular preparations released approximately the same amounts ofACh as did stimulation of the nerve trunk before toxin caused paralysis. However, one set of observations remained unexplained: it was noted that just after junctional transmission was blocked with toxin, repetitive stimulation of the motor nerve re-established muscle responses to single volleys for several minutes (post-tetanic potentiation, P.T.P.). Since the time of that publication, neuromuscular facilitation has been shown to be accompanied by an increased probability of discharge of miniature end-plate potentials (del Castillo& Katz, 1954 c) which isprobably due to changes in motor nerve terminals. Hence the possibility appeared that repetitive nerve volleys might also exert their effects equally far peripherally, as is indeed suggested by the work of Hutter (1952) and of Liley & North (1953) on partly curarized junctions. It was therefore thought of interest to examine the action of trains of nerve volleys, and of botulinum toxin, by means of intracellular electrodes. A preliminary account of some of the experiments has already appeared (Brooks, 1956).
TL;DR: An animal model is developed to study the mechanisms underlying the pain syndrome commonly seen in organ transplant patients receiving calcineurin inhibitors and identifies new strategies for treating such pain syndrome in transplant patients.
Abstract: Calcineurin inhibitors, such as cyclosporin A and tacrolimus (FK506), have played a pivotal role in the preservation of allograft function. However, these drugs can cause unexplained severe pain in patients, often referred to as calcineurin inhibitor-induced pain syndrome (CIPS). Although calcineurin can regulate NMDA receptor (NMDAR) activity, the causal relationship between spinal synaptic plasticity and CIPS remains unknown. In this study, we showed that systemic administration of FK506 (1.5 mg kg(-1) day(-1)) for 7 days in rats led to long-lasting nociceptive and mechanical hypersensitivity. Whole-cell patch-clamp recordings in spinal cord slices revealed that FK506 treatment caused a large increase in the amplitude of NMDAR-mediated excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs) of dorsal horn neurons evoked by dorsal root stimulation. The amplitude of NMDAR currents elicited by puff NMDA application to dorsal horn neurons was also significantly greater in FK506-treated than in vehicle-treated rats. The frequency of spontaneous and miniature EPSCs in most dorsal horn neurons was profoundly increased in FK506-treated rats and was reduced by blocking NMDARs. Furthermore, blocking GluN2A or GluN2B subunits similarly reduced the amplitude of evoked EPSCs and the frequency of miniature EPSCs in dorsal horn neurons of FK506-treated rats. In addition, intrathecal injection of an NMDAR antagonist or systemic administration of memantine effectively reversed nociceptive and mechanical hypersensitivity in FK506-treated rats. Our findings indicate that calcineurin inhibition increases glutamate-mediated nociceptive input by potentiating presynaptic and postsynaptic NMDAR activity in spinal cords. NMDAR antagonists may represent a new therapeutic option for the treatment of CIPS.
TL;DR: It is reported that axonal α7 nAChRs modulate presynaptic NMDAR expression and structural plasticity of glutamatergicpresynaptic boutons during early synaptic development and implicate Presynaptic α7nAChR/NMDAR interactions in synaptic developmentand plasticity.
Abstract: In association with NMDA receptors (NMDARs), neuronal α7 nicotinic ACh receptors (nAChRs) have been implicated in neuronal plasticity as well as neurodevelopmental, neurological, and psychiatric disorders. However, the role of presynaptic NMDARs and their interaction with α7 nAChRs in these physiological and pathophysiological events remains unknown. Here we report that axonal α7 nAChRs modulate presynaptic NMDAR expression and structural plasticity of glutamatergic presynaptic boutons during early synaptic development. Chronic inactivation of α7 nAChRs markedly increased cell surface NMDAR expression as well as the number and size of glutamatergic axonal varicosities in cortical cultures. These boutons contained presynaptic NMDARs and α7 nAChRs, and recordings from outside-out pulled patches of enlarged presynaptic boutons identified functional NMDAR-mediated currents. Multiphoton imaging of presynaptic NMDAR-mediated calcium transients demonstrated significantly larger responses in these enlarged boutons, suggesting enhanced presynaptic NMDAR function that could lead to increased glutamate release. Moreover, whole-cell patch clamp showed a significant increase in synaptic charge mediated by NMDAR miniature EPSCs but no alteration in the frequency of AMPAR miniature EPSCs, suggesting the selective enhancement of postsynaptically silent synapses upon inactivation of α7 nAChRs. Taken together, these findings indicate that axonal α7 nAChRs modulate presynaptic NMDAR expression and presynaptic and postsynaptic maturation of glutamatergic synapses, and implicate presynaptic α7 nAChR/NMDAR interactions in synaptic development and plasticity.
TL;DR: Several arguments are presented in support of the hypothesis that the “tonic condition” of nerve terminals and of muscle fibers is due to an abnormal condition of intracellular calcium (lack of Ca-binding by sarcoplasmic reticulum or other storage sites).
Abstract: The muscle fibers of brown and red chromatophores in the skin of the squid, Loligo opalescens, respond to motor nerve stimulation with non-propagating excitatory postsynaptic potentials (e.p.s.p.'s) of fluctuating amplitude. Depending on the strength of stimulation several size classes of e.p.s.p.'s are found, indicating polyneuronal innervation. Facilitation and summation are minimal even though the reversal potential of the e.p.s.p.'s is close to zero. Acetylcholine (ACh) and 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) have no effect on membrane characteristics of the muscle fiber, but ACh greatly augments the “spontaneous” quantal release of transmitter [increase in the frequency of miniature postsynaptic potentials (m.p.s.p.'s)] and thereby causes tonic contraction (“miniature tetanus”). 5-HT reduces the frequency of miniature potentials and abolishes tonic contraction. Inhibition of cholinesterase by eserine does not affect the amplitude or time course of e.p.s.p.'s and of m.p.s.p.'s. High concentrations of cholinergic blocking agents (atropine, banthine) reduce the postsynaptic effects of nerve stimulation in some cases. The natural transmitter substance of the motoneurones may not be ACh. The action of 5-HT appears to be intracellular. Neighboring muscle fibers are electrically coupled through low resistance pathways. These are most likely provided by the close junctions that form part of the myo-muscular junctions. The specific membrane resistance of the regular muscle fiber membrane was found to range from 1,056 to 1,320 Ohm×cm2, that of the close junctions ranges from 12.8 to 22.6 Ohm×cm2. The area occupied by close junctions is small, however, and only 10% of the current injected into one cell passes into the next. Some of the e.p.s.p.'s observed in a given muscle fiber most likely represent the electrotonic spread of the e.p.s.p.'s of the neighbor fibers. Of the six classes of e.p.s.p.'s observed in some muscle fibers, only two may originate in these fibers themselves. Chromatophores in aged preparations often exhibit pulsations. These are caused by spike potentials arising within muscle fibers whose membranes have become electrically excitable. Each spike is preceded by a generator depolarization. The electrical coupling of neighboring muscle cells permits conduction of the spike potentials throughout the set of muscle fibers of a pulsating chromatophore. Altered conditions within such preparations also lead to tonic contractions and contractures that are not necessarily accompanied by electrical activity. Several arguments are presented in support of the hypothesis that the “tonic condition” of nerve terminals (characterized by enhanced spontaneous transmitter release) and of muscle fibers (characterized by inability to relax) is due to an abnormal condition of intracellular calcium (lack of Ca-binding by sarcoplasmic reticulum or other storage sites). No evidence could be found for an inhibitory innervation of the chromatophore muscles. The nerve-induced relaxation of tonically contracted muscle fibers is caused by the action of motoneurones. Preliminary experiments on muscle fibers of the anterior byssus retractor muscle of Mytilus support the hypothesis that the tonic behavior (“catch”) of other molluscan muscles is due to mechanisms similar to those found in the chromatophore muscles.
TL;DR: It is concluded that presynaptic P-type VDCCs are involved in both evoked excitatory and inhibitory transmitter release in crayfish neuromuscular synapses.
Abstract: The toxin fraction (FTX) and peptide omega-Aga-IVA from the venom of the funnel-web spider Agelenopsis aperta, as well as a synthetic analogue of FTX, specifically block the P-type voltage-dependent Ca2+ channel (VDCC) The effects of these toxins on synaptic transmission were studied in the neuromuscular synapses of the crayfish opener muscle, which has a single excitatory and a single inhibitory motoneuron FTX selectively and reversibly blocked excitatory and inhibitory postsynaptic currents and potentials in a dose-dependent manner FTX had no effect on (i) resting and postsynaptic membrane conductance, (ii) postsynaptic L-type VDCC, and (iii) both glutamate- and gamma-aminobutyric acid-induced postsynaptic responses Mean amplitude and frequency of miniature postsynaptic potentials were unchanged by FTX The postsynaptic VDCC was inhibited by nifedipine, a selective dihydropyridine antagonist of L-type VDCC, whereas synaptic transmission was unaffected Transmission was also undisturbed by omega-conotoxin, suggesting that N-type VDCCs are not involved The peptide omega-Aga-IVA blocked excitatory and inhibitory transmission without affecting postsynaptic VDCC Synaptic transmission was also blocked by synthetic FTX We conclude that presynaptic P-type VDCCs are involved in both evoked excitatory and inhibitory transmitter release in crayfish neuromuscular synapses