TL;DR: It is found that species differences exist in the neuronal organization of the swim CPGs despite the similarity of the behaviors, suggesting that similarity in species-typical behavior is not necessarily predictive of common neural mechanisms, even for homologous neurons in closely related species.
TL;DR: It is suggested that synaptic connectivity diverged during evolution while behavior was conserved, and the connectivity itself could account for species differences in circuit responses to curare.
TL;DR: The dinoflagellate Symbiodinium (= Gymnodinum) microadriaticum (Freudenthal) occurs in a symbiotic association with the nudibranchs Melibe pilosa, an undescribed Melibe sp.
Abstract: The dinoflagellate Symbiodinium (= Gymnodinum) microadriaticum (Freudenthal) occurs in a symbiotic association with the nudibranchs Melibe pilosa, an undescribed Melibe sp., Pteraeolidea ianthina, and Berghia major. The algal symbionts reside in host-derived "carrier" cells associated with the host's digestive gland. Longer survival of starved M. pilosa, P. ianthina, and B. major in constant light than in constant dark indicates that photosynthetically fixed carbon is translocated from symbiont to host. Large lipid deposits, present in the same animal cells that contain zooxanthellae in Melibe sp. and P. ianthina, suggest that lipid or lipid precursors may comprise part of the translocated nutrients in these species. A large proportion of the fecal material in Melibe sp., P. ianthina, and B. major is composed of degenerate algal cells. It is possible that these species obtain part or all of their translocated nutrients by digestion of some of their algal symbionts. An organ that appears to function as the...
TL;DR: A network of neurons appears to constitute the central pattern generator (CPG) for this nudibranch mollusc Melibe leonina, one of only a few such networks to be described in cellular detail.
Abstract: The nudibranch mollusc Melibe leonina swims by bending from side to side. We have identified a network of neurons that appears to constitute the central pattern generator (CPG) for this locomotor behavior, one of only a few such networks to be described in cellular detail. The network consists of two pairs of interneurons, termed 'swim interneuron 1' (sint1) and 'swim interneuron 2' (sint2), arranged around a plane of bilateral symmetry. Interneurons on one side of the brain, which includes the paired cerebral, pleural and pedal ganglia, coordinate bending movements toward the same side and communicate via non-rectifying electrical synapses. Interneurons on opposite sides of the brain coordinate antagonistic movements and communicate over mutually inhibitory synaptic pathways. Several criteria were used to identify members of the swim CPG, the most important being the ability to shift the phase of swimming behavior in a quantitative fashion by briefly altering the firing pattern of an individual neuron. Strong depolarization of any of the interneurons produces an ipsilateral swimming movement during which the several components of the motor act occur in sequence. Strong hyperpolarization causes swimming to stop and leaves the animal contracted to the opposite side for the duration of the hyperpolarization. The four swim interneurons make appropriate synaptic connections with motoneurons, exciting synergists and inhibiting antagonists. Finally, these are the only neurons that were found to have this set of properties in spite of concerted efforts to sample widely in the Melibe CNS. This led us to conclude that these four cells constitute the CPG for swimming. While sint1 and sint2 work together during swimming, they play different roles in the generation of other behaviors. Sint1 is normally silent when the animal is crawling on a surface but it depolarizes and begins to fire in strong bursts once the foot is dislodged and the animal begins to swim. Sint2 also fires in bursts during swimming, but it is not silent in non-swimming animals. Instead activity in sint2 is correlated with turning movements as the animal crawls on a surface. This suggests that the Melibe motor system is organized in a hierarchy and that the alternating movements characteristic of swimming emerge when activity in sint1 and sint2 is bound together.
TL;DR: It is shown that the DSI homologues in Melibe, the cerebral serotonergic posterior-A neurons, are extrinsic to the swim CPG, and that neither the CeSP-As nor their neurotransmitter serotonin is necessary for swim motor pattern initiation, which occurred when the Ce SP-As were inactive.
Abstract: Closely related species can exhibit different behaviours despite homologous neural substrates. The nudibranch molluscs Tritonia diomedea and Melibe leonina swim differently, yet their nervous systems contain homologous serotonergic neurons. In Tritonia, the dorsal swim interneurons (DSIs) are members of the swim central pattern generator (CPG) and their neurotransmitter serotonin is both necessary and sufficient to elicit a swim motor pattern. Here it is shown that the DSI homologues in Melibe, the cerebral serotonergic posterior-A neurons (CeSP-As), are extrinsic to the swim CPG, and that neither the CeSP-As nor their neurotransmitter serotonin is necessary for swim motor pattern initiation, which occurred when the CeSP-As were inactive. Furthermore, the serotonin antagonist methysergide blocked the effects of both the serotonin and CeSP-As but did not prevent the production of a swim motor pattern. However, the CeSP-As and serotonin could influence the Melibe swim circuit; depolarization of a cerebral serotonergic posterior-A was sufficient to initiate a swim motor pattern and hyperpolarization of a CeSP-A temporarily halted an ongoing swim motor pattern. Serotonin itself was sufficient to initiate a swim motor pattern or make an ongoing swim motor pattern more regular. Thus, evolution of species-specific behaviour involved alterations in the functions of identified homologous neurons and their neurotransmitter.