About: MDA5 is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 740 publications have been published within this topic receiving 80681 citations. The topic is also known as: DEAD/H (Asp-Glu-Ala-Asp/His) box polypeptide & MDA-5.
TL;DR: A protein kinase RIO kinase 3 (RIOK3) targeting MDA5 is identified, and its possible relationship to autoimmune diseases is discussed, and the results infer that RIOK3 KO surely promotes activation of Mda5 (Figure (Figure11).
Abstract: RIG-I and MDA5 are cytoplasmic RNA sensors that recognize dsRNA patterns and activate MAVS to induce innate antiviral gene program. RNA sensing is regulated by ubiquitination in RIG-I while by phosphorylation in MDA5. Thus, de novo phosphorylation is an essential step for keeping MDA5 inactive. We identified a protein kinase RIO kinase 3 (RIOK3) targeting MDA5, and here discuss its possible relationship to autoimmune diseases.
RNA pattern-sensing is a pivotal event in host defense against virus infections, which induces innate immune response, inflammation, and augmentation of lymphocyte functions. These are rooted in RNA sensor-mediated dendritic cell (DC) maturation. TLR3, 7 and 8 in endosome and RIG-I and MDA5 RNA helicases in cytoplasm are involved in RNA sensing in DCs. MDA5 recognizes relatively long double-stranded RNA yielded as a virus replication intermediate, leading to the formation of MDA5 filament required for activating the adaptor MAVS, then inducing IRF3 activation followed by type I IFN production. [1] Poliovirus, EMCV and measles virus are representative virus species recognized by MDA5.
Notably, only a little RIG-I and MDA5 exist in resting cells and viral infection markedly up-regulates their mRNA levels in affected cells. Then, the proteins are activated sufficient to recognize cytoplasmic RNA. For RIG-I activation, ubiquitin ligases TRIM25 and Riplet are indispensable, whereas no ligase is responsible for MDA5 activation. Recent report suggested that MDA5 was activated by dephosphorylation by PP1 [2]; if so, phosphorylation of de novo MDA5 is a prerequisite for keeping MDA5 inactive. We identified that RIO kinase 3 (RIOK3) phosphorylates MDA5 to be inactivated (Figure (Figure1).1). RIOK3 selectively promotes C-terminal Ser- 828 phosphorylation of MDA5, which blocks MDA5 multimerazation and attenuates MDA5 signaling. [3]. Although another kinase might phosphorylate N-terminal region of MDA5, phosphorylation brings a dysfunctional conformation to MDA5 [2].
Figure 1
Sensing dsRNA by MDA5
Excess activation of MDA5 was recently reported to link the process of autoimmune diseases such as SLE and type I diabetes [4]. Viral infections sometimes trigger autoimmune disorders as reported clinically [5]. However, the mechanism by which autoimmune diseases are exacerbated by MDA5 over-activation remains undetermined. G821S mutation near the Ser- 828 in MDA5 appears to be associated with constitutive activation of MDA5 and closely links to autoimmune triggering [6]. In virus infections or oncogenesis, RNA is released outside the affected cells with exosomes. Thus, the source of MDA5 ligands would be provided through RNA replication or cell destruction. However, how RIOK3 is regulated in cells that take RNA into the cytoplasm is unknown yet. RIOK3 knockout (RIOK3 KO) in culture cells produced more robust type I IFN and inflammatory cytokines than wild-type cells in response to polyI:C or viral infections, which can increase MDA5 levels (Takashima K et al, unpublished data). The results infer that RIOK3 KO surely promotes activation of MDA5 (Figure (Figure11).
We are aware that the autoimmune disorder involves a number of signal axes in a variety of cells in patients. Regulatory T cells (Treg), B cells producing anti-DNA/RNA Ab, and other lymphocytes are involved in the process of autoimmunity. We notice here that innate immune response to RNA may trigger autoimmune disorder. Recent reports further suggest that Regnase-1 vs Loquin recognize 3′-stem-structured mRNA and regulate cytokine production such as IL-6 and TNF−α, which may suppress autoimmune disorder [7]. RIG-I and MDA5 are upstream of the cytokine producing gene program. Regulatory mechanism of RIG-I mechanistically differs from that of MDA5. What happens for MDA5 activation in oncogenesis, which contrasts to autoimmunity, is also intriguing. What is the role of RIOK3 in the pathogenic process of autoimmunity in the context of MDA5 activation will be the next issue to be analyzed. Since MDA5 is ubiquitously expressed, what cell types are responsible for a trigger of auto-reactive lymphocytes is a coming topic. We find we are in a new gate to the clue for the mechanistic mystery of RNA-dependent induction of autoimmune diseases.
We have elucidated the process of MDA5 activation, by which it recognizes cytoplasmic RNA. Excess RNA production via viral infections or tumor growth allows the cells to liberate a large amounts of structured RNA and facilitate autoimmune disorders (Figure (Figure1).1). We may find a new strategy to the early diagnosis, prevention and treatment of autoimmune diseases by investigating RIOK3 knockout mice.
TL;DR: The structure and function of RLRs are reviewed, including retinoic acid-inducible gene-I (RIG-I), melanoma differentiation associated gene 5 (MDA5), and laboratory of genetics and physiology 2 (LGP2), which senses viral double-stranded RNA and triggers an antiviral program including the production of IFN.
Abstract: Innate antiviral reactions are induced within hours of a viral infection. These reactions are critical to the activation of adaptive immunity. The major innate antiviral reaction is that mediated by type I and III interferons (IFNs), which activate antiviral genes through cell surface receptors, signal transducers, and transcription factors (Samuel. Clin Microbiol Rev 14:778–809, 2001; Theofilopoulos et al. Annu Rev Immunol 23:307–336, 2005; Uze and Monneron. Biochimie 89:729–734, 2007). Once the antiviral gene products establish an antiviral state, viral replication is selectively repressed. Efficient expression of IFN is observed in cells infected with viruses, suggesting that viral components produced during replication are detected by cellular sensors. A family of RNA helicases termed RIG-I-like receptors (RLRs), including retinoic acid-inducible gene-I (RIG-I), melanoma differentiation associated gene 5 (MDA5), and laboratory of genetics and physiology 2 (LGP2), senses viral double-stranded (ds) RNA and triggers an antiviral program including the production of IFN (Kawai and Akira. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1143:1–20, 2008; Yoneyama and Fujita. Immunol Rev 227:54–65, 2009). We review here the structure and function of RLRs.
TL;DR: In this article, the authors investigated the role of non-RIG-I-like receptors in activation of the type I IFN system and the establishment of an intracellular antiviral state.
Abstract: First-line defence against viral infection is contingent upon rapid detection of conserved viral structural and genomic motifs by germline-encoded pattern recognition receptors, followed by activation of the type I IFN system and establishment of an intracellular antiviral state. Novel antiviral functions of bone morphogenetic protein and related activin cytokines, acting in conjunction with, and independently of, type I IFN, have recently been described. Activin A mediates multiple innate and adaptive immune functions – including antiviral effects. However, how such effects are mediated and how activin might be triggered by viral infection have not been defined. Here we addressed this in vivo and in vitro, in humans and mice. Transcriptomic analyses delineated strikingly congruent patterns of gene regulation in hepatocytes stimulated with recombinant activin A and IFNα in vitro. Activin A mRNA, encoded by INHBA, is induced upon activation of RIG-I, MDA5 and TLR7/8 viral nucleic acid sensors in vitro, across multiple cell lines and in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells. In vivo, infection of mice with influenza A also upregulated Inhba mRNA in the lung; this local upregulation of Inhba is retained in MAVS knockout mice, indicating a role for non-RIG-I-like receptors in its induction. Activin induction and signalling were also detectable in patients with chronic viral hepatitis. Together, these data suggest Activin A is triggered in parallel with type I IFN responses and can trigger related antiviral effector functions. This model has implications for the development of targeted antiviral therapies, in addition to revealing novel facets of activin biology.
TL;DR: In this paper , the authors investigated the potential implication of avian toll-like receptor (TLR) 3 and melanoma differentiation-associated (MDA) gene 5 receptors of double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) in induction of the interferon pathway and avian orthovulavirus 1 (AOAV-1) replication in chicken-origin DF-1 fibroblast cells.
Abstract: Despite the essential role of innate immunity in defining the outcome of viral infections, the roles played by different components of the avian innate immune system are poorly delineated. Here, we investigated the potential implication of avian toll-like receptor (TLR) 3 (TLR3) and melanoma differentiation-associated (MDA) gene 5 (MDA5) receptors of double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) in induction of the interferon pathway and avian orthoavulavirus 1 (AOAV-1) replication in chicken-origin DF-1 fibroblast cells. TLR3 and MDA5 knockout (KO) DF-1 cells were generated using our avian-specific CRISPR/Cas9 system and stimulated with a synthetic dsRNA ligand polyinosinic:polycytidylic acid [poly(I:C)] or infected with AOAV-1 (previously known as Newcastle disease virus). Poly(I:C) treatment in cell culture media resulted in significant upregulation of interferon (IFN)α, IFNβ, and Mx1 gene expression in wild type (WT) DF-1 cells but not in TLR3-MDA5 double KO cells. Interestingly, poly(I:C) treatment induced rapid cell degeneration in WT and MDA5 KO cells, but not in TLR3 knockout or TRL3-MDA5 double knockout (DKO) cells, directly linking poly(I:C)-induced cell degeneration to TLR3-mediated host response. The double knockout cells supported significantly higher replication of AOAV-1 virus than did the WT cells. However, no correlation between the level of virus replication and type I IFN response was observed. Our study suggests that innate immune response is host- and pathogen specific, and further investigation is needed to understand the relevance of dsRNA receptor-mediated immune responses in viral replication and pathogenesis in avian species.Nota de investigación- En bloqueo de los genes TLR3 y MDA5 en las células DF-1 mejoran la replicación de Ortoavulavirus aviar 1. A pesar del papel esencial de la inmunidad innata en la definición del resultado de las infecciones virales, las funciones que desempeñan los diferentes componentes del sistema inmunitario innato aviar no están completamente definidas. En este estudio se investigó el posible papel del receptor aviar tipo toll (TLR) número 3 (TLR3) y los receptores de ARN de doble cadena (dsRNA del gene asociado a la diferenciación de melanoma (MDA) número 5 (MDA5) en la inducción de la vía del interferón y en la replicación del Ortoavulavirus 1 (AOAV-1) en células de fibroblastos DF-1 de origen en pollo. Las células DF-1 con los genes TLR3 y MDA5 bloqueado (KO) se generaron utilizando nuestro sistema CRISPR/Cas9 específico para aves y se estimularon con un ligando de dsRNA sintético poliinosínico: ácido policitidílico [poli(I:C)] o se infectaron con AOAV-1 (anteriormente conocido como el virus de la enfermedad de Newcastle). El tratamiento con poli(I:C) en medios de cultivo celular resultó en una regulación positiva significativa de la expresión génica de interferón (IFN)α, IFNβ y Mx1 en células DF-1 de tipo silvestre (WT) pero no en células con doble bloqueo TLR3-MDA5 (DKO). Curiosamente, el tratamiento con poli(I:C) indujo una rápida degeneración celular en las células silvestres (WT) y las células con el gene MDA5 bloqueado, pero no en las células con bloqueo del gene TLR3 o con las células con doble bloqueo de TRL3-MDA5, lo que vincula directamente la degeneración celular inducida por poli(I:C) con la respuesta de la huésped mediada por TLR3. Las células con doble bloqueo soportaron una replicación significativamente mayor del Ortoavulavirus 1 que las células silvestres. Sin embargo, no se observó correlación entre el nivel de replicación del virus y la respuesta de IFN tipo I. Este estudio sugiere que la respuesta inmune innata es específica del huésped y del patógeno, y se necesita más investigación para comprender la relevancia de las respuestas inmunes mediadas por el receptor dsRNA en la replicación viral y en la patogénesis en las especies aviares.
TL;DR: In this article , DHAV-1-encoded proteins were cloned and shown to strongly suppress IFN-β-luciferase activity, triggered by Sendai virus and polyriboinosinic polyribocytidylic acid [poly(I:C)], along with the transcription of IFNβ and downstream antiviral genes, including OASL, PKR, and TNF-a.