Macroprolactin

Abstract: For a period of 12 months all samples submitted for serum prolactin (PRL) assay and with PRL > 700 mU/L were examined by gel filtration chromatography. In 17 (25%) of 69 samples we found macroprolactin. The Delfia and Immuno 1 immunoassay systems gave similar PRL results with samples containing macroprolactin whereas the ACS 180 system gave lower results. With the Delfia and Immuno 1 systems samples containing substantial quantities of macroprolactin showed low recovery of PRL after precipitation with polyethylene glycol 6000 (PEG 6000) and this technique can be used as a screening test for macroprolactinaemia. We conclude that macroprolactinaemia is a common phenomenon and, in assays which detect this species, is a common cause of hyperprolactinaemia. Macroprolactinaemia may contribute to the difficulty in establishing an upper limit of the reference range for serum PRL. In our experience, patients with macroprolactinaemia do not exhibit features of the hyperprolactinaemia syndrome and it is important to recognize macroprolactin as the cause of hyperprolactinaemia to avoid unnecessary investigation and treatment.

Abstract: Background: Macroprolactin (big big prolactin) has reduced bioactivity and is measured by immunoassays for prolactin when it accumulates in the plasma of some individuals. We applied normative data for serum prolactin after treatment of sera to remove macroprolactin to elucidate the contribution of macroprolactin to misleading diagnoses, inappropriate investigations, and unnecessary treatment. Methods: We reviewed records of women attending a tertiary referral center who had prolactin >1000 mIU/L. Application of a reference interval to polyethylene glycol (PEG)-treated hyperprolactinemic sera identified 21 patients in whom hyperprolactinemia was accounted for entirely by the presence of macroprolactin. Presenting clinical features, diagnoses, and treatment were compared in these patients and 42 age-matched true hyperprolactinemic patients. Results: Prolactin concentrations in sera of 110 healthy individuals ranged from 78 to 564 mIU/L. The range of values for the sera after PEG treatment was 70–403 mIU/L. For macroprolactinemic samples, PEG treatment decreased mean (SD) prolactin from 1524 (202) mIU/L to 202 (27) mIU/L but decreased it only from 2096 (233) mIU/L to 1705 (190) mIU/L in true hyperprolactinemic patients ( P <0.01 between groups). Oligomenorrhea or amenorrhea and galactorrhea were the most common clinical features in both groups, although they occurred more frequently in true hyperprolactinemic patients ( P <0.05). Serum estradiol and luteinizing hormone concentrations were significantly higher in participants with macroprolactinemia than in those with true hyperprolactinemia ( P <0.05). Among participants with retrospectively identified macroprolactinemia, pituitary imaging was performed in 93% and treatment with dopamine agonist was prescribed in 87%. Conclusions: Macroprolactin is a significant cause of misdiagnosis, unnecessary investigation, and inappropriate treatment. The use of an appropriate reference interval for the PEG immunoprecipitation procedure may be of particular importance in those patients who have an excess of both macroprolactin and monomeric prolactin.

Abstract: PRL exists in different forms in human serum. The predominant form is little PRL (molecular mass 23 kDa) with smaller amounts of big PRL (molecular mass 50--60 kDa) and at times big big or macroprolactin (molecular mass 150--170 kDa). The frequency and clinical consequences of macroprolactinemia have not been clearly established, mainly because of difficulty in identifying these patients biochemically. This previously required the use of gel filtration chromatography, which could not be used routinely. Recently, a screening test using polyethylene glycol (PEG) has been used to identify macroprolactin in serum. Consequently, this study was designed to examine the use of PEG precipitation in the identification of patients with a predominance of macroprolactin and to establish the clinical characteristics of such a cohort. Over 12 months, 18,258 requests for serum PRL were received and of these 1225 patients had a serum PRL more than 700 mU/L. A total of 322 of these patients (26%) had a percentage recovery after PEG precipitation of less than 40%, thus indicating the presence of a predominance of macroprolactin. Fifty-five of these patients were referred for detailed clinical assessment. Symptoms typical of hyperprolactinemia were not common in this cohort. None had sustained amenorrhea and eight have had oligomenorrhea at age less than 40 yr. One had galactorrhea. All had pituitary imaging, and four had a microadenoma with none having a macroadenoma. PEG precipitation allows easy identification of macroprolactin in routine clinical practice. As the clinical consequences of this entity at this stage seem relatively benign, referral and intensive investigation of these patients may not be necessary. However, follow-up of a large cohort is required to ensure that the long-term outlook is likewise benign. This would have important implications for both patients and healthcare systems.

Abstract: The anterior pituitary hormone PRL was identified in animal species as early as 1933 1 but only purified in humans in 1972. 2 Since then, the clinical syndrome of hyperprolactinaemia has been characterized extensively, the predominant symptoms being galactorrhoea, oligomenorrhoea or amenorrhoea and infertility in women and reduced libido, impotence and galactorrhoea in men. 3–8 Hyperprolactinaemia has an estimated prevalence of 15% in women with secondary amenorrhoea, 9,10 a condition that affects at least 3% of women of reproductive age. 11