TL;DR: The cladistic analysis supports the sister-group relationship of Megalocoelacanthus and Libys within Latimeriidae and suggests that toothless, large-sized coelacanths evolved independently in both Latimer iidae and Mawsoniidae during the Mesozoic.
Abstract: We present a redescription of Megalocoelacanthus dobiei, a giant fossil coelacanth from Upper Cretaceous strata of North America. Megalocoelacanthus has been previously described on the basis of composite material that consisted of isolated elements. Consequently, many aspects of its anatomy have remained unknown as well as its phylogenetic relationships with other coelacanths. Previous studies have suggested that Megalocoelacanthus is closer to Latimeria and Macropoma than to Mawsonia. However, this assumption was based only on the overall similarity of few anatomical features, rather than on a phylogenetic character analysis. A new, and outstandingly preserved specimen from the Niobrara Formation in Kansas allows the detailed description of the skull of Megalocoelacanthus and elucidation of its phylogenetic relationships with other coelacanths. Although strongly flattened, the skull and jaws are well preserved and show many derived features that are shared with Latimeriidae such as Latimeria, Macropoma and Libys. Notably, the parietonasal shield is narrow and flanked by very large, continuous vacuities forming the supraorbital sensory line canal. Such an unusual morphology is also known in Libys. Some other features of Megalocoelacanthus, such as its large size and the absence of teeth are shared with the mawsoniid genera Mawsonia and Axelrodichthys. Our cladistic analysis supports the sister-group relationship of Megalocoelacanthus and Libys within Latimeriidae. This topology suggests that toothless, large-sized coelacanths evolved independently in both Latimeriidae and Mawsoniidae during the Mesozoic. Based on previous topologies and on ours, we then review the high-level taxonomy of Latimerioidei and propose new systematic phylogenetic definitions.
TL;DR: A cladistic analysis suggests that the new species is the fossil sister taxon to Latimeria, but this close relationship is weakly supported and Nevertheless, Wenzia latimerae belongs with confidence to the Latimeriidae.
Abstract: A nearly complete specimen of a new coelacanth is described from the Oxfordian of Burgundy, France. Wenzia latimerae, gen. et sp. nov., shares unique features with both the extant coelacanth Latimeria and the Mesozoic coelacanth Macropoma. It displays a unique combination of primitive characters (such as the presence of a spiracular bone and postparietal pit-lines), and derived characters (such as a postparietal shield with raised areas and very short relatively to the parietonasal shield; a consolidated snout bearing large tubercles; a deeply excavated postorbital with a long and tubular ventral expansion; a squamosal with an anterior expansion for the jugal sensory canal). A cladistic analysis suggests that the new species is the fossil sister taxon to Latimeria, but this close relationship is weakly supported. Nevertheless, Wenzia latimerae belongs with confidence to the Latimeriidae. The new specimen also provides information on the structure of the calcified plates of the ossified swim bladder, as well as on the structure of the muscle fibres. Part of the diet of this marine coelacanth is known thanks to the presence of a small crustacean in its stomach contents.
TL;DR: The Coelacanthus family of ganoids was first proposed by Agassiz in 1844, and subsequently emended by Huxley in two important memoirs of the Geological Survey of the United Kingdom (Decades X and XII) as mentioned in this paper.
Abstract: The family of Coelacanth ("hollow spined") ganoids, first proposed by Agassiz in 1844, and subsequently emended by Huxley in two important memoirs of the Geological Survey of the United Kingdom (Decades X and XII), is at present understood as comprising not more than six satisfactorily known genera, among which Coelacanthus itself, Macropoma, and Undina are of paramount importance. The first-named of these, which is typical of the family and likewise of the group Actinistia, enjoys the truly remarkable geological range from the Upper Devonian to the close of the Paleozoic, or, if the evidence of certain doubtful indications be accepted, possibly even higher; the remaining genera continue throughout the Mesozoic, and exhibit such constancy of structural characters as to render the family one of the most compact and well defined in the animal kingdom. Attention has frequently been called to the extraordinary conservatism and persistency maintained by the group throughout an unusually long life-period. Its singular history impressed both of the distinguished naturalists to whom we owe our principal knowledge of the family, Huxley's views upon the matter being thus stated by him: Bearing in mind the range of the Coelacanths from the Carboniferous [since ascertained to extend from the Devonian] to the Chalk formations inclusive, the uniformity of organization of the group appears something wonderful. I have no evidence as to the structure of the base and side-walls of the skull in Coelacan-