TL;DR: An increase in variability between samples collected from impacted vs. control areas is described for four different types of marine communities and a comparative Index of Multivariate Dispersion (IMD) is suggested as a measure of this increased variability.
TL;DR: A community of abundant suspension-feeding organisms was photographed around an active hydrothermal vent at the Galapagos Rift as mentioned in this paper, and the high standing crop of macrobenthos in these patches probably results from local increases of deep-sea food supply near hydro-thermal plumes in the bottom water.
TL;DR: In sublittoral sediments of silty sand live about 55000–1300000 meiofauna animals, which is a minimum figure because methods are not absolutely efficient and the assumption is forwarded that in general meiobenthos has a metabolism five times more active than that of macrofauna.
Abstract: 1. In sublittoral sediments of silty sand live about 55000-1300000 meiofauna animals, which is a minimum figure because methods are not absolutely efficient. 2. Meiofauna biomass ranges from 0.2 to 2.0 g wet weight in sublittoral silty sand, that is about 3% of macrofauna biomass. 3. A higher percentage of meiofauna biomass is recorded from brackish water regions, intertidal beaches and from the deep sea, where meiofauna and macrofauna biomass are of the same magnitude. 4. Oxygen consumption in meiofauna animals is between 200 and 2000, in small macrofauna between 200 and 500, and in larger macrofauna between 10 and 100 mm3 O2/h/g wet weight. 5. The assumption is forwarded that in general meiofauna has a metabolism five times more active than that of macrofauna. 6. Generation time in meiofauna lasts from a few days as was observed in cultures, to one or a few years, as was observed in natural populations. For a generalization the guess is forwarded that three generations per year would be an average meiofauna value. 7. Life cycle turnover rate as calculated from life cycle models of two nematodes is 2.2-3. Multiplied by three annual generations results in an average annual turnover rate of about 9 for meiobenthos, which is about five times more than that in macrobenthos. 8. If one compares meiobenthos and macrobenthos, meiobenthos importance in terms of food consumed and in terms of biomass provided for the food chain is 15% in a community like sublittoral silty sand, although meiobenthos in terms of standing stock is just 3% of macrobenthos.
TL;DR: In this paper, a large number of sites at the Belgian Continental Shelf (BCS) have been sampled for the macrobenthos between 1994 and 2000, and the data of all these research projects were combined and analyzed.
Abstract: Within the frame of different research projects, a large number of sites at the Belgian Continental Shelf (BCS) have been sampled for the macrobenthos between 1994 and 2000. These samples cover a diverse range of habitats: from the sandy beaches to the open sea, from the gullies between the sandbanks to the tops of the sandbanks, and from clay to coarse sandy sediments. To investigate the large-scale spatial distribution of the macrobenthos of the Belgian Continental Shelf, the data of all these research projects—728 samples—were combined and analysed. By means of several multivariate techniques, 10 sample groups with similar macrobenthic assemblage structure were distinguished. Each sample group is found in a particular physico-chemical environment and has a specific species composition. Four sample groups differ drastically, both in habitat and species composition, and are considered to represent four macrobenthic communities: (1) the muddy fine sand Abra alba–Mysella bidentata community is characterized by high densities and diversity; (2) the Nephtys cirrosa community occurs in well-sorted sandy sediments and is characterized by low densities and diversity; (3) very low densities and diversity typify the Ophelia limacina–Glycera lapidum community, which is found in coarse sandy sediments and (4) the Eurydice pulchra–Scolelepis squamata community is typical for the upper intertidal zone of sandy beaches. These macrobenthic communities are not isolated from each other, but are linked through six transitional species assemblages. The transition between the A. alba–M. bidentata community and the N. cirrosa community is characterized by a reduction in the mud content and is dominated by Magelona johnstoni. The transition between the N. cirrosa and the O. limacina–G. lapidum community is distinctive by decreasing densities and coincides with a gradual transition between medium and coarse sandy sediments. From the N. cirrosa to the E. pulchra–S. squamata community, transitional species assemblages related to the transition from the subtidal to the intertidal environment were found. Each community or transitional species assemblages was found over a specific range along the onshore–offshore gradient, four types can be discerned: (1) almost restricted to the near-shore area, but possible wider distribution; (2) distributed over the full onshore–offshore gradient; (3) restricted to the near-shore area and (4) restricted to the sandy beach environment. The diversity pattern on the BCS follows this division, with species rich and poor assemblages in the near-shore area to only species poor assemblages more offshore. The distribution and diversity patterns are linked to the habitat type, distinguished by median grain size and mud content.
TL;DR: There is a strong need for evaluating mangrove macrobenthos assemblages as a component of the connected biotic resources in the land-sea continuum, rather than as an isolated faunal group.