About: Literal (computer programming) is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 487 publications have been published within this topic receiving 7278 citations.
TL;DR: In this article, reaction times for understanding target sentences or phrases in terms of a preceding context were measured and it was found that comprehension of phrases receiving an idiomatic interpretation took no longer than the comprehension of those same phrases when given a literal interpretation.
TL;DR: Two experiments concern the comprehension of idiomatic expressions and indicate that inducing a set to perceive idioms can increase the proportion of people seeing the idiomatic meaning of test sentence first and aSet to perceive literal meanings can reduce this proportion compared to a no-set baseline.
Abstract: These experiments concern the comprehension of idiomatic expressions. The hypothesis was that there are distinct idiomatic and literal modes of processing sentences. In two experiments, 414 undergraduates read a series of sentences containing either literal or idiomatic ambiguities and then a test which had both a literal and an idiomatic meaning. Ss recorded, which meaning they perceived first. Taken together, the experiments indicate that inducing a set to perceive idioms can increase the proportion of people seeing the idiomatic meaning of test sentence first and a set to perceive literal meanings can reduce this proportion compared to a no-set baseline. Since the procedures to induce set did not involve grammatical or semantic information relevant to comprehension of the test sentence, these results suggest the existence of distinct literal and idiomatic processing strategies.
TL;DR: An algorithm is introduced that uses the hypothesis that metaphorical word usage is correlated with the degree of abstractness of the word's context to classify a word sense in a given context as either literal (denotative) or metaphorical (connotative).
Abstract: Metaphor is ubiquitous in text, even in highly technical text. Correct inference about textual entailment requires computers to distinguish the literal and metaphorical senses of a word. Past work has treated this problem as a classical word sense disambiguation task. In this paper, we take a new approach, based on research in cognitive linguistics that views metaphor as a method for transferring knowledge from a familiar, well-understood, or concrete domain to an unfamiliar, less understood, or more abstract domain. This view leads to the hypothesis that metaphorical word usage is correlated with the degree of abstractness of the word's context. We introduce an algorithm that uses this hypothesis to classify a word sense in a given context as either literal (denotative) or metaphorical (connotative). We evaluate this algorithm with a set of adjective-noun phrases (e.g., in dark comedy, the adjective dark is used metaphorically; in dark hair, it is used literally) and with the TroFi (Trope Finder) Example Base of literal and nonliteral usage for fifty verbs. We achieve state-of-the-art performance on both datasets.
TL;DR: A technique is described for determining the thresholds for the appearance of cores in random structures in a random r-uniform hypergraph to determine the threshold for the pure literal rule to find a satisfying assignment for a random instance of r-SAT.