About: Linear probability model is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 202 publications have been published within this topic receiving 5750 citations.
TL;DR: In this article, bias and inconsistency results for OLS on the linear probability model were formalized and sufficient conditions for unbiasedness and consistency to hold for the OLS results to hold.
TL;DR: Many social scientists believe that dumping long lists of explanatory variables into linear regression, probit, logit, and other statistical equations will successfully "control" for the effects of human behavior as mentioned in this paper.
Abstract: Many social scientists believe that dumping long lists of explanatory variables into linear regression, probit, logit, and other statistical equations will successfully “control” for the effects of...
TL;DR: In this paper, the logit transformation y = 1 is used to handle the bounded nature of the response. But it is only for response variables whose values are strictly within the unit interval.
Abstract: You may often want to model a response variable that appears as a proportion or fraction: the share of consumers’ spending on food, the fraction of the vote for a candidate, or the fraction of days when air pollution is above acceptable levels in a city. To handle these data properly, you must take account of the bounded nature of the response. Just as a linear probability model on unit record data can generate predictions outside the unit interval, using a proportion in a linear regression model will generally yield nonsensical predictions for extreme values of the regressors. One way to handle this for response variables’ values strictly within the unit interval is the logit transformation y = 1
TL;DR: In this article, a linear probability model of binary choices over alternatives characterized by unobserved attributes is proposed to estimate preferences of congressmen as expressed in their votes on bills, and the model is applied to estimate the preferences of Congressmen.
Abstract: This paper formulates and estimates a rigorously-justified linear probability model of binary choices over alternatives characterized by unobserved attributes. The model is applied to estimate preferences of congressmen as expressed in their votes on bills. The effective dimension of the attribute space characterizing votes is larger than what has been estimated in recent influential studies of congressional voting by Poole and Rosenthal. Congressmen vote on more than ideology. Issue-specific attributes are an important determinant of congressional" voting patterns. The estimated dimension is too large for the median voter model to describe congressional voting