About: Isamoltane is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 54 publications have been published within this topic receiving 6109 citations. The topic is also known as: CGP-361A & isamoltan.
TL;DR: It is evident that in the last decade or so, a vast amount of new information has become available concerning the various 5-HT receptor types and their characteristics, and it is important to rationalise in concert all of the available data from studies involving both operational approaches of the classical pharmacological type and those from molecular and cellular biology.
Abstract: It is evident that in the last decade or so, a vast amount of new information has become available concerning the various 5-HT receptor types and their characteristics. This derives from two main research approaches, operational pharmacology, using selective ligands (both agonists and antagonists), and, more recently, molecular biology. Although the scientific community continues to deliberate about the hierarchy of criteria for neurotransmitter receptor characterisation, there seems good agreement between the two approaches regarding 5-HT receptor classification. In addition, the information regarding transduction mechanisms and second messengers is also entirely consistent. Thus, on the basis of these essential criteria for receptor characterisation and classification, there are at least three main groups or classes of 5-HT receptor: 5-HT1, 5-HT2, and 5-HT3. Each group is not only operationally but also structurally distinct, with each receptor group having its own distinct transducing system. The more recently identified 5-HT4 receptor almost undoubtedly represents a fourth 5-HT receptor class on the basis of operational and transductional data, but this will only be definitively shown when the cDNA for the receptor has been cloned and the amino acid sequence of the protein is known. Although those 5-HT receptors that have been fully characterised and classified to date (and, hence, named with confidence) would seem to mediate the majority of the actions of 5-HT throughout the mammalian body, not all receptors for 5-HT are fully encompassed within our scheme of classification. These apparent anomalies must be recognised and need further study. They may or may not represent new groups of 5-HT receptor or subtypes of already known groups of 5-HT receptor. Even though the cDNAs for the 5-ht1E, 5-ht1F, 5-ht5, 5-ht6, and 5-ht7 receptors have been cloned and their amino acid sequence defined, more data are necessary concerning their operational and transductional characteristics before one can be confident of the suitability of their appellations. Therefore, it is important to rationalise in concert all of the available data from studies involving both operational approaches of the classical pharmacological type and those from molecular and cellular biology.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
TL;DR: In rat brain cortex slices preincubated with [3H]5-HT, the evidence indicates that the presynaptic 5- HT autoreceptor belongs to the 5-HT1B receptor subtype.
Abstract: 1.
In rat brain cortex slices preincubated with [3H]5-HT, the potencies of 17 5-HT receptor agonists to inhibit the electrically evoked3H overflow and the affinities of 13 antagonists (including several β-adrenoceptor blocking agents) to antagonize competitively the inhibitory effect of unlabelled 5-HT on evoked3H overflow were determined.
2.
The affinities of the compounds for 5-HT1B and 5-HT2 binding sites in rat brain cortex membranes (labelled by [125I]cyanopindolol = [125I]-CYP in the presence of 30 μmol/l isoprenaline and [3H]ketanserin, respectively), for 5-HT1A binding sites in pig and rat brain cortex membranes (labelled by [3H]8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin = [3H]8-OH-DPAT) and for 5-HT1C binding sites in pig choroid plexus membranes (labelled by [3H]mesulergine) were also determined. The affinities of the drugs for the various 5-HT recognition sites ranged over 4–5 log units (the functional experiments revealed the same range of differences between the drugs).
3.
There were no significant correlations between the affinities of the drugs at 5-HT1C and 5-HT2 binding sites and their potencies or affinities, determined for the 5-HT autoreceptors. In contrast, significant correlations were found between the potencies or affinities of the drugs for the autoreceptors and their affinities at 5-HT1A or 5-HT1B binding sites; the best correlations were obtained with the 5-HT1B binding site.
4.
Some of the drugs investigated were not included in the correlation since their agonistic or antagonistic effects on the autoreceptors were weak and pEC30 or apparent pA2 values could not be determined ( 7.2).
5.
In conclusion, the evidence indicates that the presynaptic 5-HT autoreceptor belongs to the 5-HT1B receptor subtype.
TL;DR: Five putative 5-HT1 receptorsubtype selective ligands have different pharmacological profiles as predicted from radioligand binding studies, and despite claims to the contrary, none of the tested compounds had actual selectivity for a given 5- HT1 receptor subtype.
Abstract: The effects of several putative 5-HT1 receptorsubtype selective ligands were investigated in biochemical models for 5-HT1A, 5-HT1B, and 5-HT1D receptors (inhibition of forskolin-stimulated adenylate cyclase activity in calf hippocampus, rat and calf substantia nigra, respectively) and 5-HT1C receptors (stimulation of inositol phosphates production in pig choroid plexus). Following compounds were studied: 5-HT (5-hydroxytryptamine), TFMPP (1-(mtrifluoromethylphenyl)piperazine), mCPP (1-m-chlorophe-nyl)piperazine, 1 CGS 12066 (7-trifluoromethyl-4-(4-methyl1-piperazinyl)-pyrrolo[1,2-a]quinoxaline 1), isamoltane (CGP 361A, 1-(2-(1-pyrrolyl)-phenoxy)-3-isopropylamino-2-propranol), quipazine, 1-NP (1-(1-naphthyl)piperazine), and PAPP (LY165163, 1-[2-(4-aminophenyl)ethyl]-4-(3-trifluoromethylphenyl)-piperazine). Among reported 5-HT1B receptor selective drugs, TFMPP had similar potency at 5HT1A, 5-HT1B and 5-HT1C receptors, mCPP did not separate between 5-HT1B and 5-HT1C receptors, CGS 12066 was equipotent at 5-HT1B and 5-HT1D receptors, and isamoltane was only slightly 5-HTIB versus 5-HT1A selective. Quipazine showed equal potency at 5-HTIB and 5-HT1C receptors and 1-NP did not discriminate between the four receptor subtypes. PAPP described as 5-HT1A receptor selective, was equally potent at 5-HT1A and 5-HT1D receptors. The potencies determined in second messenger studies were in good agreement with the affinity values determined in radioligand binding studies. Thus 5-HT1A, 5-HT1B, 5-HT1C and 5-HT1D receptors have different pharmacological profiles as predicted from radioligand binding studies. Despite claims to the contrary, none of the tested compounds had actual selectivity for a given 5-HT1 receptor subtype. Of interest were the properties of several of these drugs, which behaved as agonists at some receptors and as antagonists at others (e. g. quipazine, 1-NP, PAPP and isamoltane).
TL;DR: It is demonstrated that agmatine antidepressant-like effects in the FST seem to be mediated, at least in part, by an interaction with 5- HT(1A/1B) and 5-HT(2) receptors.
TL;DR: The present results demonstrate opposite effects, facilitation and inhibition, of male rat ejaculatory behaviour by stimulation of 5‐HT1A and 5‐ HT1B receptors, respectively, suggesting that the SSRI‐induced inhibition of male ejaculatory dysfunction is due to 5-HT1B receptor stimulation.
Abstract: Ejaculatory problems and anorgasmia are well-known side-effects of the SSRI antidepressants, and a pharmacologically induced increase in serotonergic neurotransmission inhibits ejaculatory behaviour in the rat In the present study the role of 5-HT1A and 5-HT1B receptors in the mediation of male rat ejaculatory behaviour was examined by use of selective agonists and antagonists acting at these 5-HT receptor subtypes
The 5-HT1A receptor agonist 8-OH-DPAT (025–400 μmol kg−1 sc) produced an expected facilitation of the male rat ejaculatory behaviour, and this effect was fully antagonized by pretreatment with the new selective 5-HT1A receptor antagonist (R)-3-N,N-dicyclobutylamino-8-fluoro-3,4-dihydro-2H-1-benzopyran-5-carboxamide hydrogen (2R,3R) tartrate monohydrate (NAD-299) (10 μmol kg−1 sc) NAD-299 by itself (075–300 μmol kg−1 sc) did not affect the male rat ejaculatory behaviour
The 5-HT1B receptor agonist anpirtoline (025–400 μmol kg−1 sc) produced a dose-dependent inhibition of the male rat ejaculatory behaviour, and this effect was fully antagonized by pretreatment with the 5-HT1B receptor antagonist isamoltane (16 μmol kg−1 sc) as well as by the new and selective antagonist (R)-(+)-2-(3-morpholinomethyl-2H-chromene-8-yl)oxymethylmorpholino methansulphonate (NAS-181) (16 μmol kg−1 sc) Isamoltane (10–160 μmol kg−1 sc) and NAD-181 (10–160 μmol kg−1 sc) had no, or weakly facilitatory effects on the male rat ejaculatory behaviour The non-selective 5-HT1 receptor antagonist (−)-pindolol (8 μmol kg−1 sc), did not antagonize the inhibition produced by anpirtoline
The present results demonstrate opposite effects, facilitation and inhibition, of male rat ejaculatory behaviour by stimulation of 5-HT1A and 5-HT1B receptors, respectively, suggesting that the SSRI-induced inhibition of male ejaculatory dysfunction is due to 5-HT1B receptor stimulation