TL;DR: Jorgenson and Jorgenson as mentioned in this paper applied the theory of optimum capital accumulation to tax policy and investment behavior, estimating the impact of tax policy on investment behavior. But their analysis was limited to the first year of the first-year system, and they did not consider the second year.
Abstract: Tax policy and investment behaviour: tax policy and the cost of capital services, estimates of the parameters of the investment function, the effects of tax policy on investment behaviour, Robert E. Hall and Dale W. Jorgenson application of the theory of optimum capital accumulation: theory of investment behaviour, econometrics of investment behaviour, estimates of the parameters of the investment functions, impact of tax policy on investment behaviour, Robert E. Hall and Dale W. Jorgenson technology and decision rules in the theory of investment behaviour: introduction, technology, objective function, optimal investment policy, decision rules, Dale W. Jorgenson the economic impact of investment incentives: introduction, postwar investment incentives in the United States, the economic analysis of investment incentives, current policy alternatives, direct impact, total impact, Dale W. Jorgenson the economic theory of replacement and depreciation: introduction, replacement, depreciation, form of the replacement distribution, Dale W. Jorgenson investment and production - a review: introduction, form of the production function - cross sections, form of the production function - time series, returns to scale, Dale W. Jorgenson the investment tax credit and counter-cyclical policy: summary, introduction, impact of the investment tax credit, alternative investment tax credits, appendices - the investment equation, optimization procedures, Roger H. Gordon and Dale W. Jorgenson inflation-proof depreciation of assets: the first-year system, administrative aspects, ... against two others, future economic impact, a better way, Alan J. Auerbach and Dale W. Jorgenson inflation and corporate capital recovery: introduction, theoretical frame-work, empirical implementation, capital recovery during the postwar period, proposed systems for capital recovery, Dale W. Jorgenson and Martin A. Sullivan the efficiency of capital allocation: introduction, technology and preferences, general equilibrium model, appendix - list of instrumental variables, Dale W. Jorgenson and Kun-Young Yun tax policy and capital allocation: introduction, tax policy, technology and preferences, general equilibrium model, tax reform, appendix - list of instrumental variables, Dale W. Jorgenson and Kun-Young Yun. (Part contents).
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present a theory of the investment and valuation of a corporation analogous to the neo-classical theory without the assumptions that the future is known with certainty and with minor qualifications that funds are freely available at a given rate of interest.
Abstract: In the neo-classical theory of a firm's investment, the objective of the firm is to maximize its value. Its value is a function of its future income and its future income is a function of its investment. As Lutz and Lutz [8] admirably demonstrated in their standard work on the subject, given the behavior postulate and these two functions, the investment and value of a firm may be determined. Unfortunately, however, the numerous models they constructed assume the future is known with certainty and with minor qualifications that the firm can freely lend or borrow at a given rate of interest. These conditions are not realized in fact, the data of their models cannot be observed, and the models stand as elegant intellectual exercises of limited usefulness.1 A consequence is that the literature concerned with testable propositions on the investment and the valuation of the firm makes little or no reference to the neo-classical theory. Further, empirical theories of investment, for example, those discussed in Meyer and Kuh [ io], refer to the valuation of the firm only in passing, and theories of valuation such as Durand [1] make no reference to the investment of the firm. Only the normative literature, including in a sense Modigliani and Miller [ii] relates the investment and value of a firm, but this literature continues to provide little empirical information on the investment and financing that maximize the value of a firm. The purpose of this paper is to present a theory of the investment and valuation of a corporation analogous to the neo-classical theory without the assumptions that the future is certain and that funds are freely available at a given rate of interest. Specifically, the initial statement is that the value of a firm is a function of its expected future income. The future income is then represented by a function of the corporation's investment to obtain an expression in which a share's price is the dependent variable, the investment function provides the independent variables, and the parameters represent the corporation's cost of capital. In general structure the model parallels those of neo-classical theory, and similarly it may be solved to find the investment that maximizes the value of the firm. The difference is that the variables are observable and the parameters may be estimated from sample data. The model is developed under restrictive assumptions with respect to the financing policies of corporations and the form of the return on investment function. These assumptions are irritating from a theoretical point of view, but they are of limited material significance as will be evidenced by the empirical results to be presented. Work currently under way and to be reported later, however, will make the model considerably more general. The theory will be tested here as a valuation model and not as an investment model. That is, the ability of the model to explain the differences in price among common stocks will be tested, and it will be seen that under a variety of considerations the model performs better than previous efforts in this direction. By the statement that the theory will not be tested as an investment model, I mean that no attempt will be made to establish whether or not the investment of the corporation is determined by the objective of maximizing its value. Under the functional form of the stock price model established, a corporation's cost of capital is an increasing function of the rate of * The research reported here was supported by a grant from the Sloan Research Fund, School of Industrial Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and the computations were carried out at the Computation Center, M.I.T. Discussions with Professors Chow, Kuh, and Solow and comments by Professor Modigliani on an earlier draft of this paper have been of considerable assistance to the writer. The advice of Ramesh Gangolli on problems of statistical inference was most helpful. I am especially indebted to Henry Y. Wan, Jr., for his unflagging energy and painstaking care in collecting the data and programming the computations. 'In the last half of their book the Lutzes withdraw the assumption that the future is certain, but this material is largely a well written distillation of the qualitative statements contained in textbooks on finance.
TL;DR: In this paper, the effect of exchange rate policy on investment, the relationship between public and private investment, and the importance of market imperfections and financial constraints on capital formation are discussed.
Abstract: This article reviews theories of investment behavior and examines empirical studies of investment in developing countries. The emphasis is on understanding the interactions among macroeconomic policies, structural adjustment, and private investment. The article deals with the effect of exchange rate policy on investment, the relationship between public and private investment, the importance of market imperfections and financial constraints on capital formation, and the effect of economic instability on irreversible investment decisions.
TL;DR: In this article, a post-Keynesian growth model is developed, in which financial variables are explicitly taken into account, and a variation of an investment function is estimated econometrically, applying the auto-regressive distributed lag-based approach proposed by Pesaran et al.
Abstract: A Post-Keynesian growth model is developed, in which financial variables are explicitly taken into account. Variants of an investment function are estimated econometrically, applying the ARDL (auto-regressive distributed lag)-based approach proposed by Pesaran et al. (Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16 (3), pp. 289–326). The econometric results are discussed with respect to a remarkable phenomenon that can be observed for some important OECD countries since the early 1980s: accumulation has generally been declining while profit shares and rates have shown a tendency to rise. We concentrate on one potential explanation of this phenomenon, which is particularly relevant for the USA and relies on a high propensity to consume out of capital income.
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors specify a model in which a firm may face fixed, linear, and convex costs of investing, and estimate the resulting investment function using firm-level data from 11 countries.