About: Interrupt priority level is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 1877 publications have been published within this topic receiving 31001 citations.
TL;DR: In this paper, a method and apparatus for use in handling interrupts in a data processing system where the kernel is preemptible, has real-time scheduling ability, and which supports multithreading and tightly-coupled multiprocessors is presented.
Abstract: The disclosed invention is a method and apparatus for use in handling interrupts in a data processing system where the kernel is preemptible, has real-time scheduling ability, and which supports multithreading and tightly-coupled multiprocessors. The invention more specifically provides a technique for servicing interrupts in a processor by means of kernel interrupt handler threads which service the interrupt from start to finish. For efficiency, the interrupt handler threads do not require a complete context switch unless the interrupt handler thread is blocked. The kernel makes use of preprepared interrupt handler threads for additional efficiency, and these interrupt handler threads are not subjected to inordinate delays caused by the phenomenon of interrupt priority inversion if they do become blocked.
TL;DR: In this article, a multi-processor programmable interrupt controller system is described, which includes an I/O interrupt controller for receiving interrupt requests from an IO subsystem; multiple processor interrupt controllers, each associated with a specific processor for dispensing of accepted interrupts; and an interrupt controller bus primarily for the transmission of interrupt requests between interrupt controller units and for priority arbitration, using a standard message format and arbitration protocol.
Abstract: A multi-processor programmable interrupt controller system which includes: an I/O interrupt controller for receiving interrupt requests from an I/O subsystem; multiple processor interrupt controllers, each associated with a specific processor for dispensing of accepted interrupts; and an interrupt controller bus primarily for the transmission of interrupt requests between interrupt controller units and for priority arbitration, using a standard message format and arbitration protocol.
TL;DR: In this article, the power state and task priority information for the first and second components are evaluated to determine which component should service the interrupt request, and either the first component or the second component is selected to be a destination component to service the interruption request based on the power states and task priorities.
Abstract: A method for a mechanism for processor power state aware distribution of lowest priority interrupts. The method of one embodiment comprises receiving first power state information from a first component and second power state information from a second component. First task priority information from the first component and second task priority from the second component are also received. An interrupt request from a first device for servicing is received. Power state and task priority information for the first and second components are evaluated to determine which component should service the interrupt request. Either the first component or the second component is selected to be a destination component to service the interrupt request based on the power state and task priority information. The interrupt request is communicated to the destination component.
TL;DR: A centralized interrupt controller with a single copy of APIC logic provides APIC interrupt delivery services for all processing units of a multi-sequencer chip or system as discussed by the authors, where the interrupt sequencer block schedules the interrupt services according to a fairness scheme.
Abstract: A centralized interrupt controller with a single copy of APIC logic provides APIC interrupt delivery services for all processing units of a multi-sequencer chip or system. An interrupt sequencer block of the centralized interrupt controller schedules the interrupt services according to a fairness scheme. At least one embodiment of the centralized interrupt controller also includes firewall logic to filter out transmission of selected interrupt messages. Other embodiments are also described and claimed.
TL;DR: In this article, a multiprocessing system with a plurality of thread contexts (TCs) and a virtual processing element (VPE) is described, where the interrupt requests are non-specific to the plurality of TCs, and the VPE is configured to select a non-exempt one of the plurality to service each of the interrupted requests.
Abstract: A multiprocessing system is disclosed. The system includes a multithreading microprocessor, including a plurality of thread contexts (TCs), each comprising a first control indicator for controlling whether the TC is exempt from servicing interrupt requests to an exception domain for the plurality of TCs, and a virtual processing element (VPE), comprising the exception domain, configured to receive the interrupt requests, wherein the interrupt requests are non-specific to the plurality of TCs, wherein the VPE is configured to select a non-exempt one of the plurality of TCs to service each of the interrupt requests, the VPE further comprising a second control indicator for controlling whether the VPE is enabled to select one of the plurality of TCs to service the interrupt requests. The system also includes a multiprocessor operating system (OS), configured to initially set the second control indicator to enable the VPE to service the interrupts, and further configured to schedule execution of threads on the plurality of TCs, wherein each of the threads is configured to individually disable itself from servicing the interrupts by setting the first control indicator, rather than by clearing the second control indicator.