About: Intermediate nerve is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 48 publications have been published within this topic receiving 973 citations. The topic is also known as: nervus intermedius & nerve of Wrisberg.
TL;DR: It is suggested that the common double innervation of the posterior ampulla by two nerves running in two separate bony canals could offer an alternative explanation for the regular sparing of posterior canal function in vestibular neuritis.
Abstract: Vestibular neuritis is a common cause of partial unilateral vestibular paralysis, which usually spares posterior semicircular canal function. The cause is assumed to be a viral reactivation of latent herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) in human vestibular ganglia. The existence of an anastomosis between the intermediate nerve and the superior vestibular nerve suggests the question of whether selective affliction of the superior vestibular nerve is the result of migration of HSV-1 from the geniculate ganglion along this faciovestibular anastomosis. We determined the distribution of HSV-1 among geniculate ganglia, vestibular ganglia, and within Scarpa's ganglion by examining 35 human temporal bones by polymerase chain reaction. HSV-1 was found in 66% of geniculate ganglia and 60% of vestibular ganglia; all examined parts of vestibular ganglia were almost equally HSV-1 infected. Our data provided no support for viral migration along this anastomosis or for a preferential latency of HSV-1 in the superior vestibular nerve. We suggest that the common double innervation of the posterior ampulla by two nerves running in two separate bony canals could offer an alternative explanation for the regular sparing of posterior canal function in vestibular neuritis.
TL;DR: The distribution patterns of conduction abnormalities may be useful in the prediction of outcome of patients with CIDP, which consists of subtypes with varying predilections for lesions along the course of the nerve.
Abstract: Background: Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) is a heterogeneous disorder having a wide clinical range, and is characterised by multifocal demyelination that can involve the distal nerve terminals, intermediate nerve segments, and nerve roots. Objective: To investigate whether the distribution patterns of demyelination along the course of the nerve correlate with clinical profiles in patients with CIDP. Methods: Motor nerve conduction studies were carried out on 42 consecutive patients. According to the physiological criteria for demyelination, the presence of a demyelinative lesion was determined in the distal nerve segments (distal pattern) or intermediate nerve segments (intermediate pattern), or in both (diffuse pattern). The serum concentration of tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α was measured by immunoassay. Results: Patients were classified as having a distal (n=10), intermediate (n=13), or diffuse (n=15) pattern, or were unclassified (n=4). Patients with the distal or diffuse pattern had common clinical features such as subacute onset, symmetric symptoms, and weakness involving proximal as well as distal muscles. Patients with the distal pattern had a good response to treatment and a monophasic remitting course, but the diffuse pattern was associated with a treatment dependent relapsing course, reflecting longer disease activity. The serum TNF-α concentrations increased only in the “diffuse” subgroup of patients, and this might be associated with breakdown of the blood-nerve barrier and therefore, involvement of the intermediate segments. The intermediate pattern was characterised by a chronic course, asymmetric symptoms, less severe disability, and refractoriness to treatments. Conclusions: CIDP consists of subtypes with varying predilections for lesions along the course of the nerve. The distribution patterns of conduction abnormalities may be useful in the prediction of outcome of patients with CIDP.
TL;DR: It is confirmed that rhombomeres are critical to hindbrain development and that they are the fundamental unit at which motor neurons are specified.
Abstract: The adult facial nerve contains the axons from two populations of efferent neurons. First, the branchiomotor efferent neurons that innervate the muscles of the second arch. These neurons project out of the hindbrain in the motor root and form the facial motor nuclei. Second, the preganglionic efferent neurons that innervate the submandibular and pterygopalatine ganglia. These neurons project from the hindbrain via the intermediate nerve and form the superior salivatory nucleus. The motor neurons of the facial nerve are known to originate within rhombomeres 4 and 5. In the kreisler mouse mutant there is a specific disruption of the hindbrain rhombomeres 5 and 6 appear to be absent. To investigate changes in the organization of the facial motor neurons in this mutant, we have used lipophilic dyes to trace the facial motor components both retrogradely and anterogradely. As expected, facial motor neurons are missing from rhombomere 5 in this mutant. In addition, the loss of these neurons correlates with the specific loss of the superior salivatory nucleus. In contrast, the branchiomeric neurons, that originate in rhombomere 4, appear to develop normally. This includes the caudal migration of their cell bodies forming the genu of the facial nerve. Our studies confirm that rhombomeres are critical to hindbrain development and that they are the fundamental unit at which motor neurons are specified.
TL;DR: There is no major reason why the nervus intermedius Wrisbergii, which comprises a sensory fibre compartment and a mass of ganglion-cells as part of the facial nerve, should renounce this right.
Abstract: The clinical status of this disorder (also called auricular neuralgia, Hunt's geniculate neuralgia, facial nerve neuralgia, or tic douloureux of the chorda tympani) has, on the face of the evidence, dubious claims to recognition. Every craniospinal sensory nerve with an extraneuraxial ganglion is entitled to voice protest against abuse in its own (neuralgic) way; there is no major reason why the nervus intermedius Wrisbergii, which comprises a sensory fibre compartment and a mass of ganglion-cells as part of the facial nerve, should renounce this right.
TL;DR: It is thought that anti-GD1a antibodies account for the axonal involvement because GD1a is present in the axolemma and exposed at the node of Ranvier and in nerve terminals and the exclusive motor involvement could be explained by the fact that GD 1a has a different internal structure in motor and sensory fibers.