TL;DR: Wang et al. as mentioned in this paper measured the relationship between different personality types by using complex network approach for finding effective nodes of personality type for software programmer and found that each personality type has its own complex behavior which should be extracted for better outcomes.
Abstract: Several authors have identified the different personality types for software team composition. Effective personality types for software development roles is still a question.This study aims to measure the relationship between different personality types by using complex network approach for finding effective nodes of personality type for software programmer.In order to achieve the objective, the study was conducted on student population. Myer-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) personality assessment tool was used to obtain the personality types of participants. Furthermore, degree centrality, betweenness centrality, and closeness centrality measures were used on data. These measures were used to find the
strongly liked personality types among team members, personality types that can create effective communication, and personality types which can work close with other personality types. Basically, two types of results were obtained from applied measures: personality types which are weighted and frequent and personality types which are weak and less frequent.For example, ISTJ, INFJ, ISTP, and INFP personality types were found very less lucrative in working close with other personality types.On the other hand, ISTJ has been found very effective personality type for programmer role in software development literature. The results suggest that each personality type has its own complex behavior which should be extracted for better outcomes. Deciding one particular personality type for
programmer role would be an injustice with it. Therefore, this paper recommends to use complex network phenomenon to extract the hidden
facts behind each personality types for software development roles.
TL;DR: Self-knowledge, as measured by the MBTI, could prove beneficial for prospective dental hygiene students, students currently enrolled in dental hygiene programs, and educators and help them identify career paths in the field that would enhance career fulfillment, thereby increasing the retention of professionals inThe field.
Abstract: The purpose of this study was (1) to determine the personality characteristics of dental hygiene students, and (2) to determine if dental hygiene students have personality characteristics similar to those of the general population. Students from three non-baccalaureate degree programs were requested to complete a demographic questionnaire and the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI). Eighty-six percent of the 124 students responded. The MBTI data was analyzed using frequency distributions, electivity indices, and chi-square analyses. Individuals categorized as ESFJ (extraversion, sensing, feeling, and judging) and ISFJ (introversion, sensing, feeling, and judging), two of the possible 16 MBTI personality types, comprised 39% of the sample. These two personality types were found in significantly greater numbers in the study population than in a random sample of the general population. People with the ISTJ (introversion, sensing, thinking, and judging), INFP (introversion, intuition, feeling, and perception), and INFJ (introversion, intuition, feeling, and judging) MBTI personality types were found in significantly lesser numbers in the study population than in a random sample of the general population. This suggests that dental hygiene students are not drawn at random from the general population. Self-knowledge, as measured by the MBTI, could prove beneficial for prospective dental hygiene students, students currently enrolled in dental hygiene programs, and educators. Additionally, practicing dental hygienists might find that the MBTI personality assessment results could help them identify career paths in the field that would enhance career fulfillment, thereby increasing the retention of professionals in the field.
TL;DR: Jungian Psychology and Hidden Personality The Hidden Personality in Context: The Dynamics of Jungian Typology The Effects of Type Dynamics The Hidden personality in Action: Approaching the Hidden personality of The 16 Types Extraverted Thinking Types - ESTJ and ENTJ Introverted Feeling Types - ISFP and INFP Introverted thinking Types - ISTP and INTP Extraverted feeling Types - ESFJ and ENFJ Extraverted Sensing Types- ESTP and ESFP introverted Intuitive Types - INTJ and INFJ introverted Sensensing Types - ENTP and ENFP When
Abstract: Jungian Psychology and Hidden Personality The Hidden Personality in Context: The Dynamics of Jungian Typology The Effects of Type Dynamics The Dynamics of The Hidden Personality The Hidden Personality in Action: Approaching The Hidden Personality of The 16 Types Extraverted Thinking Types - ESTJ and ENTJ Introverted Feeling Types - ISFP and INFP Introverted Thinking Types - ISTP and INTP Extraverted Feeling Types - ESFJ and ENFJ Extraverted Sensing Types - ESTP and ESFP Introverted Intuitive Types - INTJ and INFJ Introverted Sensing Types - ISTJ and ISFJ Extraverted Intuitive Types - ENTP and ENFP When Hidden Personalities Meet In and Out of the Grip
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors investigated the relationship between MBTI and emotional intelligence among university students and found that introvert, intuition, feeling and judging (INFJ) personality type were more emotionally intelligent than the extrovert, sensing, thinking and perceiving (ESTP) personality types.
Abstract: The study was a descriptive correlational in nature in which scientific method was used to test the research objectives. The major objective of this study was to investigate the relationship between Myers Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) and Emotional Intelligence (E.I) among university students. A 33 items questionnaire concerning E.I and 80 items concerning MBTI was used to collect the data for the study. Data was collected from 60 randomly selected students both male and female in master programs of the National University of Modern languages, Islamabad region, Pakistan. For data analysis mean, standard deviation and correlation were applied. The finding of the study showed that introvert, intuition, feeling and judging (INFJ) personality type were more emotionally intelligent than the extrovert, sensing, thinking and perceiving (ESTP) personality type. Keywords: Myers Briggs Type Indicator, Emotional Intelligence, university students.
TL;DR: In this article, the authors investigated the relationship between male and female EFL learners' learning styles and their personality types and found that there was no statistically significant relationship between males and females' learning style and personality types.
Abstract: The aim of the present study was to investigate the relationship between male and female EFL learners’ learning styles and their personality types. To this end, one-hundred English majors took part in the study. The participants consisted of 78 females and 22 males. The Group Embedded Figures Test (GEFT) was used to assess the participants’ field dependent/independent (FD/FI) learning styles. The Personality Style Inventory (PSI) was also administered to assess the personality types of the participants. The data obtained from the PSI showed that the most frequent personality types were ISTJ (introvert, sensing, thinking, judging), ESTJ (extrovert, sensing, thinking, judging), and ESTP (extrovert, sensing, thinking, perceiving) personality types, and the least frequent types were ENFJ (extrovert, intuitive, feeling, judging), and INFJ (introvert, intuitive, feeling, judging). Moreover, the results of the GEFT showed that 52% of the subjects were of FI learning style type and 48% of them had a FD learning style. The results of Chi-Square test and Fisher’s Exact Test also showed that there was no statistically significant relationship between males and females’ learning styles and personality types. The EFL instructors’ awareness of these differences in personality types and learning styles can enable them to create a more dynamic atmosphere in the classroom through designing activities that meet the learning preferences of different types of learners.