TL;DR: Granular cell tumor must be added to the differential diagnosis of epibulbar masses and Immunohistochemistry of the tumor in this case suggests an uncom mitted mesenchymal cell origin.
Abstract: (2) peculiar "taming" effect on monkeys in that aggression disappears, and (3) thalamic stimulation.2 Although the drug has been in clinical use since 1954, reports of toxicity have been scattered, and only one review of adverse responses has appeared.3 One death has been reported.4 The purpose of this communication is to present a case of meprobamate idiosyncrasy with skin bi¬ opsy and skin testing, to review the pub¬ lished reports to date, and to discuss possible etiologic factors in the pathogene¬ sis of the anaphylactoid reaction. The records of more than 6500 patients have been summarized to date.8"81 Twentythree cases of attempted suicide,6"19 and one hundred thirteen cases of idiosyncrasy have
TL;DR: It has been proposed that some idiosyncratic reactions, especially those involving the liver, represent metabolic idiosyncrasy; however, there are even less data to support this hypothesis and much more work needs to be done.
Abstract: Clinical characteristics and circumstantial evidence suggest that idiosyncratic drug reactions are caused by reactive metabolites and are immune-mediated; however, there are few definitive data and there are likely exceptions. There are three principal hypotheses for how reactive metabolites might induce an immune-mediated idiosyncratic reaction: the hapten hypothesis, the danger hypothesis, and the PI hypothesis. It has been proposed that some idiosyncratic reactions, especially those involving the liver, represent metabolic idiosyncrasy; however, there are even less data to support this hypothesis. The unpredictable nature of these reactions makes mechanistic studies difficult. There is a very strong association with specific human leukocyte antigen (HLA) genes for certain reactions, but this has only been demonstrated for very few drugs. Animal models represent a very powerful tool for mechanistic studies, but the number of valid models is also limited. There may be biomarkers of risk; however, much more work needs to be done.
TL;DR: Analgesic challenge was employed to identify fifty patients with aspirin idiosyncrasy and found that patients with a history of the condition were highly sensitive and reacted to small doses of aspirin or to paracetamol.
Abstract: Summary
Analgesic challenge was employed to identify fifty patients with aspirin idiosyncrasy. No serious reactions were observed using the method described. Patients with a history of the condition were highly sensitive and reacted to small doses of aspirin or to paracetamol. Patients with a positive challenge test, but previously unaware of aspirin idiosyncrasy, were less sensitive: they required larger challenge doses of aspirin and did not respond to paracetamol challenge. In the absence of an in vitro test, analgesic challenge is the only means of confirming the presence of aspirin idiosyncrasy.