TL;DR: In this paper, a SWOT analysis for decision-making Malaysian international HEIs is presented, which reveals that it is important for Malaysia to promote itself as an education hub in South-east Asia.
TL;DR: The statements that have the strongest positive impact on cooperation are those fulfilling a disapproval function, particularly when the topic of the messages are the payoffs obtained by the group.
TL;DR: In this article, the authors used an Australian-based re-organization project to explain why linguistic concepts might be used to conceive projects made complex by conflicting stakeholders, using idea networking to reveal the concepts underpinning stakeholders' comments.
TL;DR: In this article, a conceptual frame using idea networking for service providers in an emerging cultural accommodation industry is presented. But the conceptual frame is not defined as experienced patterns of activity, rather it is defined as an explanation of ideas that enables this conceptual frame to be constructed inductively from diverse participants' ideas.
Abstract: Action research interventions require use of some form of conceptual frame to guide and evaluate the intervention. Pragmatism offers an explanation of ideas that enables this conceptual frame to be constructed inductively from diverse participants’ ideas. They define ideas as experienced patterns of activity. The purpose of this paper is to explain why and how this pragmatic explanation of ideas can be used to induce an action research conceptual frame. As a demonstration, the paper inducts (emerges) a conceptual frame using idea networking for service providers in an emerging cultural accommodation industry. 50 h of interviews and site visits provided 117 individual idea statements which were networked. The conceptual frame that emerged had five elements: sufficient-legitimation, selected-market, inclusive-boomi, appropriately-financial, and collaboratively-empowered. This provides a coordinated, multi-part, way of evaluating any possible future changes.
TL;DR: The results of the study indicate that problem statements can be analyzed and classified, and the problem statement classification structure created through this project provides a vehicle for problem statement assignment, thereby lending additional form to the problem definition process.
Abstract: For many years, the U.S. Government has encouraged the transfer of technologies developed through taxpayer funded endeavors to the commercial sector of the U.S. economy. The Regional Technology Applications Board, based at NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center, is an organization with technology transfer responsibilities. The Board receives technology transfer assistance (TTA) requests from many private-sector firms. The Board relies heavily on a problem statement from the requestor of technology assistance in determining an appropriate solution to the requestor's needs. However, the problem statements contained in these requests are often vague, ambiguous, or repetitive. This study reports on a method developed to analyze and classify problem statements that have been received by the Board so that additional understanding of the nature of these problems is obtained. One thousand one hundred past problem statements were analyzed using a content analysis method. The hierarchical classification structure developed during this project includes classes, sub-classes, and sub-sub-classes, allowing for differentiation of problem statements based upon key elements contained within the statements. Previously, no method for analysis and classification of problem statements had been documented. The results of the study indicate that problem statements can be analyzed and classified. The problem statement classification structure created through this project provides a vehicle for problem statement assignment, thereby lending additional form to the problem definition process. The study also provides an understanding of the frequency and distribution of TTA problem statements received by the Board.