TL;DR: In this series amblyopia, uncorrectable by spectacles and occlusion, was highly likely (48%) if a child had +3.50 or more dioptres of meridional hypermetropia at age 1 year, and squint as such was not so accurately predictable.
Abstract: In this series amblyopia, uncorrectable by spectacles and occlusion, was highly likely (48%) if a child had +3.50 or more dioptres of meridional hypermetropia at age 1 year. 45% of children with this refraction also had a squint. All those who remained with severely defective acuity in spite of treatment had either +3.50 or more dioptres of meridional hypermetropia or 4 or more dioptres of meridional myopia at age 1 year. These children were identifiable in the 3.7% of the population at age 1 year who showed high refractive errors. Squint as such was not so accurately predictable. Of those children with squint 71% had less than +3.50 dioptres of meridional hypermetropia at age 1 year--an incidence of 4.4% of the population. Apart from two 'congenital myopes' only 16% of these had residual amblyopia after treatment, and their last known acuity was never less than 6/12. Astigmatism in infancy or later is not significantly associated with squint or amblyopia.
TL;DR: Since there is a close association between the refraction and how, when, and whether a child presents with squint and/or amblyopia, it would seem reasonable to reconsider refraction as a basis for screening young children for visual defects.
Abstract: +2-00 to +2-75 dioptres of spherical hypermetropia in the more emmetropic of a pair of eyes is significantly associated with esotropia (P less than 0-001) and the presence of amblyopia (P less than 0-01). Anisometropia is not significantly associated with esotropia (P = 0-31) unless there is spherical hypermetropia of +2-00 dioptres or more in the more emmetropic eye (P less than 0-001). Hypermetropic anisometropia of +1-00 DS or +1-00 D.Cyl. is associated with the presence of amblyopia (P less than 0-001). In the absence of esotropia there is also a significant association between the amount of anisometropia and the initial depth of amblyopia (P less than 0-01). The additional presence of esotropia increases the depth of amblyopia further (P less than 0-05) but not the incidence of amblyopia (P greater than 0-30). The level of significance of the association of refractive errors with squint/amblyopia was itself significantly higher (P less than 0-01) than that between a family history of squint or "lazy eye" on the one hand and squint and/or amblyopia on the other hand. 72 +/- 3% of all cases of esotropia and/or amblyopia in this sample of children had a refractive error of +2-00 DS or more spherical hypermetropia in the more emmetropic eye, or +1-00 D. or more spherical or cylindrical anisometropia. Since there is a close association between the refraction and how, when, and whether a child presents with squint and/or amblyopia, it would seem reasonable to reconsider refraction as a basis for screening young children for visual defects.
TL;DR: Cycloplegic refraction of 1-year-old children is technically possible and is acceptable to mothers as a method for screening children for visual defects and the possibility that meridional hypermetropia could be the basic defect in squint and amblyopia is discussed.
Abstract: Cycloplegic refraction of 1-year-old children is technically possible and is acceptable to mothers as a method for screening children for visual defects. The range of refractions found in a sample of 186 1-year-old children is reported. Prediction of which children are significantly at risk for squint and/or amblyopia is possible on the basis of refractions at age 1 year according to the criteria selected for an 'abnormal' refraction. Bilateral hypermetropia and/or astigmatism or anisometropia at age 1 year was significantly (P less than 1 in 10 000) associated with a child eventually being found to have squint or amblyopia. Both the age of screening and criteria of abnormality will probably need modification. +2.50 or more D hypermetropia in any one meridian of either eye at age 1 year was even more significantly (P = 0.000 000 05%) associated with squint and/or amblyopia. The possibility that meridional hypermetropia could be the basic defect in squint and amblyopia is discussed.
TL;DR: A striking right-left specificity in the oblique astigmatic eyes suggests that mechanical factors on the cornea from the upward slanting palpebral fissures may be a major aetiological factor in the astigmatism.
Abstract: AIMS To study the refractive development in children with Down9s syndrome longitudinally. METHODS An unselected population of 60 children with Down9s syndrome was followed with repeated retinoscopies in cycloplegia for 2 years or more (follow up 55 (SD 23) months). Accommodation was assessed with dynamic retinoscopy. RESULTS From longitudinal spherical equivalent values of the right eye, three main categories of refraction were defined: stable hypermetropia ( +4.0 D). An accommodation weakness was found in 55% of the children. Accommodation weakness was significantly less frequent in the stable, low grade hypermetropia group (22%) than in all the other groups (p=0.008). The frequency of astigmatism ⩾1.0 D at the last visit was 57%, the direction of axis being predominantly “with the rule.” All the eyes with oblique astigmatism had a side specific direction of axis; the right eyes belonging to the 135° axis group and the left eyes to the 45° axis group. CONCLUSION A stable, low grade hypermetropia was significantly correlated with a normal accommodation. Accommodation weakness may be of aetiological importance to the high frequency of refractive errors encountered in patients with Down9s syndrome. A striking right-left specificity in the oblique astigmatic eyes suggests that mechanical factors on the cornea from the upward slanting palpebral fissures may be a major aetiological factor in the astigmatism.
TL;DR: It is suggested that these eyes did not “recognise” the signal of blurred vision, and that they remained long sighted because they were destined to squint, and glasses did not prevent them squinting.
Abstract: AIM—To explore why emmetropisation fails in children who have strabismus.
METHODS—289 hypermetropic infants were randomly allocated spectacles and followed. Changes in spherical hypermetropia were compared in those who had strabismus and those who did not. The effect of wearing glasses on these changes was assessed using t tests and regression analysis.
RESULTS—Mean spherical hypermetropia decreased in both eyes of "normal" children (p 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS—In contrast with normal infants, neither eye of those who had strabismus emmetropised, irrespective of whether the incoming vision was clear or blurred. It is suggested that these eyes did not "recognise" the signal of blurred vision, and that they remained long sighted because they were destined to squint. Hence, the children did not squint because they were long sighted, and glasses did not prevent them squinting.