TL;DR: Cothonaspis rapae (Westd.) was found to be an effective parasite of the Cabbage Root Maggot (Hylemyia brassicae Bouche) in the Cambridge district and could not be induced to oviposit in saprophagous Anthomyid larvae.
Abstract: Summary.
1
Cothonaspis rapae (Westd.) was found to be an effective parasite of the Cabbage Root Maggot (Hylemyia brassicae Bouche) in the Cambridge district. Twenty-five per cent. of the total of host maggots and puparia examined were found to be parasitised by this cynipid.
2
The average duration of a life cycle of C. rapae is 92 days and the length of the larval stage is about 55 days. There are two generations in the season; the first appears in May and the second in August and September.
The winter is passed in the larval stage.
3
Hypermetamorphosis occurs in the life cycle, the primary larva being eucoiliform with three long pairs of thoracic processes, a long cauda, and suctorial mouth parts. The full grown larva is a typical mandibulate hymenopterous grub without cauda or appendages of any kind.
4
The life-histories of Figites anthomyiarum Bouche, Kleidotoma marshalli (Marshall) and an undetermined Kleidotoma are described.
They are all effective parasites during the early larval stages of carrion feeding Diptera such as the Calliphora erythrocephala, Sarcophaga carnaria, Lucilia sericata, etc. The writer estimates that saprophagous maggots are reduced in numbers by 30 per cent. owing to parasitisation by various Cynipid parasites during the early larval stages.
5
These three parasites have each two broods per season. The duration of the Figitids' life cycle is about 60 days, but that of both Kleidotomids takes from 10 to 20 days longer. There does not appear to be any definite period of emergence, but one generation overlaps another.
6
The primary larva of F. anthomyiarum is a modified eucoiliform. No primary larva of a figitine species has been hitherto described. The primary larvae of the two Kleidotomids are eucoiliform but with short thoracic processes. These types of primary larvae are each succeeded by an entirely new type of endoparasitic larva which bears pronounced affinities to the polypod embryonic stage. The writer has termed this type of larva the polypodeiform larva. The polypodeiform larva of both F. anthomyiarum and Kleidotoma marshalli are figured and described.
The early stage forms of parasitic Cynipid larvae are reviewed and compared.
7
Several experiments were conducted to test whether Cynipids parasitising saprophagous maggots would oviposit in phytophagous maggots and vice versa. Under suitable conditions F. anthomyiarum was induced to oviposit in the maggots of H. brassicae (phytophagous) but the eggs did not develop.
C. rapae, however, could not be induced to oviposit in saprophagous Anthomyid larvae.
TL;DR: D degree of metamorphosis depends on the degree of influence of the suppression factor, which checks development and is maintained almost at full level throughout larval life.
Abstract: Summary
.(i) The general theory is developed that metamorphosis is not the activation of imaginal rudiments but a repetition of the developmental processes occurring during embryogenesis. Furthermore, the developmental phenomena accompanying ordinary ecdysis are comparable to metamorphosis and hence also to embryogenesis. Insect life histories consist therefore of a series of repeated developmental cycles all similar in essence to embryogenesis. In insects without metamorphosis these cycles are all alike and no abrupt change takes place. In metaboious forms the earlier cycles are modified to varying degrees. In the Hemimetabola the earlier cycles are subject to the influence of inhibitory hormones and the adult features appear only at the last ecdysis. In the Holometabola the larval cycles are subject to a much more powerful ‘suppression’ influence which checks development and is maintained almost at full level throughout larval life. At metamorphosis this influence is removed and a full development can then take place. Hence degree of metamorphosis depends on the degree of influence of the suppression factor.
(2) In the embryonic development of Calliphora the mid-gut develops in three sections: (a) the pro-enteron, formed by direct transformation of the inner end of the ‘stomodaeum’ and lying between the stomodaeal membrane and the anterior imaginal ring, (b) the mes-enteron, formed from polar rudiments (or in other types from the proliferations from the inner end of the stomodaeum and proctodaeum), and (f) the met-enteron, formed by direct transformation of the inner end of the ‘proctodaeum’, carrying the Malpighian tubules as anterior appendages, and situated between the proctodaeal membrane and the posterior imaginal ring. It is believed that many widely divergent types, including Aptera and Orthoptera, as well as Holometabola, conform to this mode of development. In Calliphora, at metamorphosis, the anterior imaginal ring forms a new ‘pupal stomodaeum’ which produces an adult pro-enteron in the same way as the corresponding larval structure arose in the embryo. Similarly, the posterior imaginal ring recreates the pupal proctodaeum and eventually forms an adult met-enteron. In spite of serious gaps in our knowledge it is believed that most of the Holometabola conduct their metamorphoses in this way. It is also probable that in many cases new mid-gut cells are budded off from the imaginal ring to form a new adult mes-enteron.
(3) The basic similarity between the developmental cycles associated with metamorphosis and those associated with ordinary ecdysis is shown by the experimental results derived from Rhodnius. Here any ecdysis can produce nymphal or imaginal characteristics according to the presence or absence of inhibitor hormone. ICpithelial renovation in the mid-gut, such as occurs at metamorphosis, takes place at all ecdyses, except in the higher Diptera and Hymenoptera. The formation of the imaginal Malpighian tubules at metamorphosis in the Hymenoptera is similar to the mode of origin of new tubules in ordinary instars in Blatta.
(4) The suppression of development in early instars is shown in several ways. Cell hypertrophy, characteristic of many larvae, is due to a high degree of polyploidy. Thus cell division, but not chromosome division, is suppressed during larval stages. At metamorphosis, when the suppression influence is removed, rapid mitosis occurs, and the correct chromosome numbers are restored. Epithelial renovation in the mid-gut usually occurs at each ecdysis (as well as at metamorphosis), but in the higher Diptera and Hymenoptera it is suppressed during larval stages. Imaginal cells are not imaginal rudiments but merely suppressed renovation cells, which resume their normal activity at metamorphosis because the suppression influence is then removed. If a new adult mid-gut is produced it probably always arises from the imaginal rings as in Calandra. The imaginal Malpighian tubules of the higher Hymenoptera are homologous with the secondary tubules which arise in every instar in Blatta. Their non-appearance prior to metamorphosis is thus an indication of suppression of their development during larval stages. In the vast majority of Coleoptera, Lepidoptera, and Diptera secondary tubules are permanently suppressed and the larval tubules become the adult organs. The lifting of the influence of the suppression factor at metamorphosis shows that it has much in common with the inhibitory hormone in Rhodnius. However, the latter has not been shown actually to suppress development, although at present only its action on the hypodermis is at all well known.
(5) Variations in larval forms can be explained by assuming that they are due to varying degrees of intensity of action of the suppression influence. They may be arranged in a series such as nymph, campodeiform larva, various degrees of reduction of the campodeiform type, caterpillars, grubs and maggots. Such a series then represents successive reduction due to progressively more severe suppression in embryonic and larval stages. Hypermetamorphosis is the result of varying degrees of suppression at the various ecdyses of an individual life history. The protopod and polypod instars of certain of the parasitic Hymenoptera are precociously hatched embryos and not definitive larval forms like the rest.
TL;DR: Results show that pseudopupae at various ages respond similarly to low temperature exposure, which may ensure that resumption of development synchronizes in a population.
TL;DR: It is suggested that the bean blister beetle Epicauta gorhami Marseul partially produces two generations a year in southwestern Japan on the basis of the short developmental period and diapause avoidance under summer conditions.
Abstract: Larvae of the bean blister beetle Epicauta gorhami Marseul (Coleoptera: Meloidae) feed on grasshopper eggs in soil and undergo hypermetamorphosis. This beetle undergoes larval diapause in the fifth instar as a pseudopupa, a form characteristic of hypermetamorphosis in meloid beetles. The effects of temperature, photoperiod and soil humidity on larval development of E. gorhami are examined in a population in Miyazaki, Japan, using egg pods of Locusta migratoria L. as food. At lower temperatures (20 and 22.5 °C), all larvae become pseudopupae, regardless of the photoperiod. By contrast, at higher temperatures (27.5 and 30 °C), almost all larvae pupate at the end of the fourth instar, again regardless of the photoperiod. A long-day photoperiodic response occurs only at an intermediate temperature (25 °C): under an LD 12 : 12 h photocycle, all larvae enter diapause, although the diapause incidence tends to decrease as the day length becomes longer. Pseudopupae are immobile and remain in diapause for ≥120 days when they are kept under the same conditions, except that diapause terminates within a relatively short time at 30 °C. Although lower soil humidity retards post-feeding development, soil humidity has no effect on the diapause incidence. On the basis of the short developmental period and diapause avoidance under summer conditions, it is suggested that this beetle partially produces two generations a year in southwestern Japan.
TL;DR: The transition instar is interpreted as an ontogenetic bridge, a stage of risk and metabolic cost without function, in Marmara arbutiella Busck, which is hypermetamorphic, with 3 behaviorally and morphologically distinct larval forms.
Abstract: Development in Marmara arbutiella Busck is hypermetamorphic, with 3 behaviorally and morphologically distinct larval forms. There are 6–8 sap-feeding and 2 nonfeeding, structurally differentiated instars. The early instars are legless, dorsoventrally compressed, prognathous sap feeders. The 1st of the nonfeeding instars, which we call the transition instar, never issues from the cuticle of the previous (feeding) instar; instead there is apolysis without ecdysis. It is characterized by reduction—the cuticle is transparent, the feeding structures are nonfunctional, and the legs are vestigial. Moreover, the stadium is ephemeral, lasting no ≤24 h. The 2nd nonfeeding stage is a fully legged and ambulatory instar, with rudimentary feeding structures and a functional spinneret. Upon issuing from the mine, this instar spins a cocoon that is elaborately decorated with clusters of 31–114 pearly bubbles that are extruded from its anus and then individually attached to the exterior of the cocoon. We contrast...