About: Hydroxycitronellal is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 122 publications have been published within this topic receiving 2794 citations. The topic is also known as: Citronellal hydrate & 3,7-Dimethyl-7-hydroxyoctanal.
TL;DR: Ten new agonists and three antagonists of TRPM8 are identified and it is found that, in contrast to VR1,TRPM8 is inhibited rather than potentiated by protons.
Abstract: TRPM8 (CMR1) is a Ca2+-permeable channel, which can be activated by low temperatures, menthol, eucalyptol and icilin. It belongs to the transient receptor potential (TRP) family, and therefore is related to vanilloid receptor type-1 (VR1, TRPV1). We tested whether substances which are structurally related to menthol, or which produce a cooling sensation, could activate TRPM8, and compared the responses of TRPM8 and VR1 to these ligands.
The effects of 70 odorants and menthol-related substances on recombinant mouse TRPM8 (mTRPM8), expressed in HEK293 cells, were examined using a FLIPR® assay. In all, 10 substances (linalool, geraniol, hydroxycitronellal, WS-3, WS-23, FrescolatMGA, FrescolatML, PMD38, CoolactP and Cooling Agent 10) were found to be agonists.
The EC50 values of the agonists defined their relative potencies: icilin (0.2±0.1 μM)>FrescolatML (3.3±1.5 μM) > WS-3 (3.7±1.7 μM) >(−)menthol (4.1±1.3 μM) >frescolatMAG (4.8±1.1 μM) > cooling agent 10 (6±2.2 μM) >(+)menthol (14.4±1.3 μM) > PMD38 (31±1.1 μM) > WS-23 (44±7.3 μM) > Coolact P (66±20 μM) > geraniol (5.9±1.6 mM) > linalool (6.7±2.0 mM) > eucalyptol (7.7±2.0 mM) > hydroxycitronellal (19.6±2.2 mM).
Known VR1 antagonists (BCTC, thio-BCTC and capsazepine) were also able to block the response of TRPM8 to menthol (IC50: 0.8±1.0, 3.5±1.1 and 18±1.1 μM, respectively).
The Ca2+ response of hVR1-transfected HEK293 cells to the endogenous VR1 agonist N-arachidonoyl-dopamine was potentiated by low pH. In contrast, menthol- and icilin-activated TRPM8 currents were suppressed by low pH.
In conclusion, in the present study, we identified 10 new agonists and three antagonists of TRPM8. We found that, in contrast to VR1, TRPM8 is inhibited rather than potentiated by protons.
Keywords: TRPM8, CMR1, cold, menthol, VR1, odorants, proton activation, FLIPR, pain
Introduction
The recent cloning and characterization of the cold-menthol receptor (TRPM8; CMR1) (McKemy et al., 2002; Peier et al., 2002) was a major breakthrough in the study of thermosensation. TRPM8 is activated by menthol, eucalyptol and icilin, and by temperatures below ∼25°C. It belongs to the ‘long', or melastatin, subfamily of the transient receptor potential (TRP) family of ion channels (Montell et al., 2002), and shows pronounced outward rectification with a relatively high permeability for Ca2+ ions, and little selectivity between monovalent cations. The TRPM8 channel is expressed specifically in a subset of temperature-sensing trigeminal and dorsal root ganglion neurones (Peier et al., 2002; Reid et al., 2002a, 2002b; Nealen et al., 2003). Recently, a second cold receptor, ANKTM1, has been identified (Story et al., 2003), which, in contrast to TRPM8, is coexpressed with VR1 in a different subset of pain- and temperature-sensing trigeminal and dorsal root ganglion neurones. ANKTM1 is activated by icilin, but not menthol. These TRP channels play a major role in thermosensation (McKemy et al., 2002; Patapoutian et al., 2003).
Although treatment with menthol or eucalyptol, or with cold temperatures, is a traditional method of pain relief (Wright, 1870; Green & Mcanliffe, 2000; Davies et al., 2002; Galeotti et al., 2002; Shanghai Medicinal Herbs, Essential Balm), little is known about the underlying analgesic mechanisms. It has been demonstrated that menthol blocks Na+ and Ca2+ channels in dorsal root ganglion cells (Swandulla et al., 1987; Haeseler et al., 2002). Others have postulated that the analgesic activity of (–)menthol is mediated by selective activation of κ-opioid receptors (Galeotti et al., 2002).
The cold receptor TRPM8 is distantly related to the well-characterized heat-sensitive vanilloid receptor VR1 (or TRPV1). VR1 also belongs to the TRP channel family, but is activated by temperatures >42°C, or by ligands such as capsaicin and resiniferatoxin (RTX). Two endogenous VR1 agonists have been identified, anandamide (ANA) and N-arachidonoyl-dopamine (NADA) (Zygmunt et al., 1999; Di Marzo et al., 2001; Huang et al., 2002). Various VR1 antagonists have also been reported, for example, capsazepine, iodo-resiniferatoxin (I-RTX) and N-(4-tert.butyl-phenyl)-4-(3-chloropyridin-2-yl) tetrahydro-pyrazine-1(2H)-carboxamide (BCTC). These have analgesic effects in vivo (Bevan et al., 1992; Walpole et al., 1994; Catarina et al., 1997; 2000; Tominaga et al., 1998; Wahl et al., 2001; Pomonis et al., 2003; Rigoni et al., 2003).
Protons act as endogenous activators and modulators of VR1 responses. Low pH enhances the apparent VR1-binding affinity of capsaicin, and potentiates the channel gating of VR1 receptors (Caterina et al., 1997; 2000; Tominaga et al., 1998; Olah et al., 2001; Ryu et al., 2003). Since inflammation leads to acidification of the inflamed tissue, VR1 is thought to play a major role in the transduction of inflammatory pain.
As VR1 and TRPM8 are distantly related, and no antagonists have been described for TRPM8, we tested the effects of VR1 antagonists on TRPM8. Further, we investigated whether the responses of VR1 and TRPM8 towards agonists are influenced by pH.
TL;DR: Chemical analyses of domestic and occupational products indicates that investigation of potential contact allergy related to these products types should consider fragrance allergens additional to those in the FM, since these may occur with high frequency.
Abstract: Epidemiological studies have described an increasing prevalence of fragrance allergy and indicated an association with hand eczema. 59 domestic and occupational products intended for hand exposure were subjected to gas chromatography-mass spectrometric (GC-MS) analyses to test the hypothesis that fragrance chemicals known to have the potential to cause contact allergy but not included in fragrance mix (FM) may be common ingredients in these products. A quantitative analysis of 19 selected fragrances was performed by GC-MS. Further analysis of GC-MS data revealed the presence of 43 other fragrance chemicals/groups of fragrance chemicals in the products investigated. Among the 19 target substances the most commonly detected were limonene in 78%, linalool in 61% and citronellol in 47% of the products investigated. The FM ingredients were present in these products with the following frequencies: oak moss (evernic acid methylester) 2%, cinnamic alcohol 2%, cinnamic aldehyde (cinnamal) 3%, isoeugenol 5%, alpha-amylcinnamic aldehyde (amyl cinnamal) 8%, hydroxycitronellal 12%, eugenol 27%, and geraniol 41%. Thus, the chemical analyses of domestic and occupational products indicates that investigation of potential contact allergy related to these products types should consider fragrance allergens additional to those in the FM, since these may occur with high frequency.
TL;DR: Patch tests to several screening sets of fragrance materials were performed on perfume-sensitive patients, and the most common allergens were found to be a jasmin synthetic, cinnamic alcohol, and hydroxycitronella.
Abstract: • Patch tests to several screening sets of fragrance materials were performed on 20 perfume-sensitive patients. The most common allergens were found to be a jasmin synthetic (18 of 20 patients), cinnamic alcohol (15 of 20 patients), and hydroxycitronellal (9 of 20 patients). More than half of the patients were also contact sensitive to other ingredients of cosmetics and over-the-counter and prescription preparations. ( Arch Dermatol 113:623-626, 1977)
TL;DR: The seventh amendment of the European Union Cosmetics Directive and the Detergents Regulations of the EU (October 2005) are now legal requirements in Europe, and Cosmetic products and detergents must be labelled for 26 individual named fragrances.
Abstract: Background The seventh amendment of the European Union (EU) Cosmetics Directive (March 2005) and the Detergents Regulations of the EU (October 2005) are now legal requirements in Europe. Cosmetic products and detergents must be labelled for 26 individual named fragrances, when present at concentrations of > 10 parts per million (p.p.m.) in leave-on products and > 100 p.p.m. in rinse-off products. Objectives To make an assessment of the exposure pattern to fragrance of the U.K. consumer and to determine the frequency with which the constituent fragrances of fragrance mix I (FM I) and fragrance mix II (FM II) are included in products currently sold in the U.K. Methods A study of perfumed cosmetic and household products available on the shelves of U.K. retailers was carried out in January 2006. Products were included if 'parfum' or 'aroma' was listed among the ingredients. Three hundred products were surveyed and any of the 26 listed fragrances named on the label were recorded. Results The top six most frequently labelled fragrances were linalool (190; 63%), limonene (189; 63%), citronellol (145; 48%), geraniol (126; 42%), butyl phenyl methyl propional (Lilial(trade mark)) (126; 42%) and hexyl cinnamal (125; (42%). One of these, geraniol, is present in FM I and two others, citronellol and hexyl cinnamal, in FM II, thus tested as part of the British Standard patch test series. The frequencies of other constituents of FM I were as follows: eugenol, 80 (27%); hydroxycitronellal, 52 (17%); isoeugenol, 27 (9%); cinnamic alcohol, 25 (8%); amyl cinnamal, 22 (7%); cinnamal, 17 (6%); Evernia prunastri (oak moss absolute), 13 (4%). The other constituents of FM II occurred as follows: coumarin, 90 (30%); hydroxyisohexyl-3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde (Lyral(trade mark)), 88 (29%); citral, 74 (25%); farnesol, 23 (8%). Linalool (n = 46; 66%) was the most frequently found fragrance in 70 personal care products (soap, shampoo, shower gel). Linalool (n = 47; 80%) and limonene (n = 45; 76%) were the most frequent in 59 products for men (e.g. aftershave). Limonene (n = 29; 51%) predominated in 57 household products (washing-up liquid, detergent). Limonene (n = 43; 98%) and linalool (n = 42; 95%) were the most frequent fragrances in 44 perfumes for women. Alpha-isomethyl ionone (n = 28; 72%) was the most frequent in 39 cosmetics (foundation, lipstick, etc). Citronellol predominated (n = 15; 88%) in 17 deodorants and limonene (n = 9; 64%) was the commonest in 14 dental products (toothpaste and mouthwash). Thirty-four products (11%) contained none of the listed fragrances but were labelled as containing 'parfum' or 'aroma'. Conclusions There is ongoing consumer exposure to the most frequent sensitizers in FM I: E. prunastri, isoeugenol and the cinnamon fragrances cinnamal and cinnamic alcohol. Hydroxyisohexyl-3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde (Lyral(trade mark)) is present at significant concentrations in almost one-third of products. Linalool and limonene, fragrance terpenes which are significant allergens in their oxidized state, are the most frequent fragrances encountered by individuals living in the U.K. The current exposure pattern of the U.K. consumer suggests that we should add oxidized limonene and oxidized linalool to the test series for patients suspected to have fragrance allergy.
TL;DR: The incidence of a concomitant positive patch test to balsam of Peru in fragrance‐sensitive patients showed wide variation, suggesting that it is not a reliable marker of fragrance allergy.
Abstract: Fragrances are widely encountered in our daily environment and are known to be a common cause of allergic contact dermatitis. We have reviewed our patch test data from 1980 to 1996 to establish whether the pattern of fragrance allergy has changed with time. During this period, 25,545 patients (10,450 male, 15,005 female) were patch tested with the European standard series. The mean annual frequency of positive reactions to the fragrance mix was 8.5% in females (range 6.1-10.9) and 6.7% in males (range 5.1-12.9). Females were 1.3 times more likely to be allergic to fragrance (P < 0.001, 95% confidence interval, CI 1.17-1.41). Males with fragrance allergy were older than females by 5.6 years (mean age 48.2 vs. 42.6 years; P < 0.001, 95% CI 3.9-7.3). The incidence of a concomitant positive patch test to balsam of Peru in fragrance-sensitive patients showed wide variation, suggesting that it is not a reliable marker of fragrance allergy. There was a positive correlation between the isomers isoeugenol and eugenol. Oak moss remained the most common overall allergen throughout the study, positive in 38.3% of females and 35.6% of males who were tested to the constituents of the fragrance mix. During the period of the study the incidence of positive tests to oak moss increased by 5% yearly (P = 0.001, 95% CI 2.2-8.7). The frequency of allergic reactions to eugenol and geraniol remained relatively constant. Isoeugenol and alpha-amyl cinnamic aldehyde sensitivity increased and hydroxycitronellal showed a slow decline. There was a striking reduction in the frequency of sensitivity to cinnamic aldehyde (by 18% yearly; P < 0.001, 95% CI 14.3-21.0) and cinnamic alcohol (by 9% yearly; P < 0.001, 95% CI 5.2-12.9); these are now uncommon fragrance allergens. These data show temporal trends which may reflect the frequency of population exposure to individual fragrances.