TL;DR: Muscle soreness following exercise was greatest in people with diabetes, and the best modality of the three studied to reduce this type of soreness was chemical moist heat.
Abstract: Background Delayed-onset muscle soreness (DOMS) is a serious problem for people who do not exercise on a regular basis. Although the best preventive measure for diabetes and for maintaining a low hemoglobin A1c is exercise, muscle soreness is common in people with diabetes. For people with diabetes, DOMS is rarely reported in exercise studies. Research design One hundred twenty subjects participated in three groups (young, older, and type 2 diabetes) and were examined to evaluate the soreness in the abdominal muscles after a matched exercise bout using a p90x exercise video (Beachbody LLC, Los Angeles, CA) for core fitness. Next, three heating modalities were assessed on how well they could reduce muscle soreness: ThermaCare(®) (Pfizer Consumer Healthcare, Richmond, VA) heat wraps, hydrocollator heat wraps, and a chemical moist heat wrap. Results The results showed that people with diabetes were significantly sorer than age-matched controls (P Conclusions Muscle soreness following exercise was greatest in people with diabetes, and the best modality of the three studied to reduce this type of soreness was chemical moist heat.
TL;DR: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of a moist versus a dry heat source on the skin in eliciting a blood flow response to add data to this model of heat transfer through the limb based only on calories delivered from a heat source.
Abstract: Pennes first described a model of heat transfer through the limb based only on calories delivered from a heat source, calories produced by metabolism and skin blood flow. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of a moist versus a dry heat source on the skin in eliciting a blood flow response to add data to this model. Ten subjects were examined, both male and female, with a mean age of 32.5 ± 11.6 years, mean height of 172.8 ± 12.3 cm, and mean weight of 77.6 ± 19.5 kg. Skin temperature was measured by a thermocouple placed on the skin and skin blood flow measured by a laser Doppler flow meter. The results of the experiments using a dry heat pack (commercially available chemical 42°C cell dry heat source), moist hydrocollator pack (72.8°C) separated from the skin by eight layers of towels, and whirlpool at 40°C, showed that moist heat caused a significantly higher skin blood flow (about 500% greater) than dry heat (p < 0.01). Most of the greater increase in skin blood flow with moist heat w...
TL;DR: Results of RPE reinforce that active warmup reduces the resistance to stretch, and an active warm‐up before PNF stretching appears to be the most effective treatment to increase hip ROM.
Abstract: Acute effects of active and passive warmup,
proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF), and ratings
of perceived exertion (RPE) were compared during hip-joint
range of motion (ROM). Two active warm-up treatments included
(a) achieving a respiratory exchange ratio (RER) of 1.00 and
(b) achieving 60% of heart rate reserve (HRR). Hydrocollator
pads (HP) served as the passive warm-up treatment. These
treatments and a control were randomly assigned to increase
hamstring muscle temperature of the dominant leg. Warm-up
treatments were administered to 12 men (mean 25.3 years) with
a minimum of 24 hours interspersed between each treatment. A
timed PNF (slow-reversal-hold) technique was conducted after
each warm-up treatment. Tukey tests (p < 0.05) showed ROM
for RER (107.48) was greater than all other treatments. ROM
for HRR (102.88) and HP (103.48) did not differ from each other
but were greater than the control (98.88). Ratings of perceived
exertion were lowest for RER (4.0) and highest for control (8.5).
Ratings of perceived exertion for HRR (6.0) and HP (6.5) were
similar. In conclusion, an active warm-up before PNF stretching
appears to be the most effective treatment to increase hip ROM.
Results of RPE reinforce that active warm-up reduces the resistance
to stretch. In a field setting, it is estimated that a warmup
of 70% of HRR would duplicate the muscle readiness equivalent
to an RER of 1.00 before PNF stretching.
TL;DR: A prolonged PH due to WI can be expected in patients with initially severe headache, with an extensive decrease of mobility of the cervical spine, with subjective impediment, with depressive mood, with somatic-vegetative complaints, with a history of pretraumatic headache and with increased age.
Abstract: Head trauma (HT) and whiplash injury (WI) is followed by a posttraumatic headache (PH) in approx. 90% of patients. The PH due to common WI is located occipitally (67%), is of dull-pressing or dragging character (77%) and lasts on average 3 weeks. Tension headache is the most frequent type of PH (85%). Besides posttraumatic cervicogenic headache or symptomatic, secondary headache due to SDH, SAB, ICB or increased ICP, migraine- or cluster-like headache can be observed in rare cases. Prolonged application of analgetics (> 4 weeks) can cause a drug induced headache. In 80% of patients PH following HT shows remission within 6 months. Chronic PH lasting at least 4 years occurs in 20%. Unfavorouble prognostic factors include an age higher than 40 yrs, a low intellectual, educational and socio-economic level, previous HT or a history of alcohol abuse. A prolonged PH due to WI can be expected in patients with initially severe headache, with an extensive decrease of mobility of the cervical spine, with subjective impediment, with depressive mood, with somatic-vegetative complaints, with a history of pretraumatic headache and with increased age. Acute PH is treated with analgesics, antiphlogistics and/or muscle relaxants; chronic PH with thymoleptics (e.g. Amitryptiline or Amitryptiline oxide). Additional physical therapy (e.g. wearing a cervical collar for a short time, hydrocollator pack), physiotherapy incl. muscle relaxation techniques (Jacobson) and psychotherapy can be performed. Medico-legal issues should be solved as soon as possible.
TL;DR: The MRSA outbreak in a college football team in August 2006 was successfully controlled through team education and implementation of improved infection-control practices and hygiene policies.
Abstract: An outbreak of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) occurred in a college football team in August 2006. Of 109 players on the team roster, 88 (81%) were interviewed during a cohort investigation. Twenty-five cases were identified, six of which were culture-confirmed. Available culture isolates were typed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), which identified two different MRSA strains associated with the outbreak. Playing positions with the most physical contact (offensive linemen, defensive linemen, and tight ends) had the greatest risk of infection [risk ratio (RR) 5.1, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.3-11.5. Other risk factors included recent skin trauma (RR 1.9, 95% CI 0.95-3.7), use of therapeutic hydrocollator packs (RR 2.5, 95% CI 1.1-5.7), and miscellaneous training equipment use (RR 2.1, 95% CI 1.1-4.1). The outbreak was successfully controlled through team education and implementation of improved infection-control practices and hygiene policies.