TL;DR: This invention relates to prefabricated buildings and comprises a central unit having a peripheral section therearound to form a main residential part defined by an assembly of juxtaposed roofing and facing trusses.
Abstract: This invention relates to prefabricated buildings and comprises a central unit having a peripheral section therearound to form a main residential part. This peripheral part is defined by an assembly of juxtaposed roofing and facing trusses; the roofing trusses rest on said central unit and also on the facing trusses which themselves rest on a peripheral support wall. The facing trusses are of triangular section and have an inclined outer wall extending downwardly and beyond the said peripheral support wall.
TL;DR: The goal of this book is to provide a textbook which presents the basics ofTree automata and several variants of tree automata which have been devised for applications in the aforementioned domains.
Abstract: CONTENTS 7 Acknowledgments Many people gave substantial suggestions to improve the contents of this book. These are, in alphabetic order, Introduction During the past few years, several of us have been asked many times about references on finite tree automata. On one hand, this is the witness of the liveness of this field. On the other hand, it was difficult to answer. Besides several excellent survey chapters on more specific topics, there is only one monograph devoted to tree automata by Gécseg and Steinby. Unfortunately, it is now impossible to find a copy of it and a lot of work has been done on tree automata since the publication of this book. Actually using tree automata has proved to be a powerful approach to simplify and extend previously known results, and also to find new results. For instance recent works use tree automata for application in abstract interpretation using set constraints, rewriting, automated theorem proving and program verification, databases and XML schema languages. Tree automata have been designed a long time ago in the context of circuit verification. Many famous researchers contributed to this school which was headed by A. Church in the late 50's and the early 60's: B. Trakhtenbrot, Many new ideas came out of this program. For instance the connections between automata and logic. Tree automata also appeared first in this framework, following the work of Doner, Thatcher and Wright. In the 70's many new results were established concerning tree automata, which lose a bit their connections with the applications and were studied for their own. In particular, a problem was the very high complexity of decision procedures for the monadic second order logic. Applications of tree automata to program verification revived in the 80's, after the relative failure of automated deduction in this field. It is possible to verify temporal logic formulas (which are particular Monadic Second Order Formulas) on simpler (small) programs. Automata, and in particular tree automata, also appeared as an approximation of programs on which fully automated tools can be used. New results were obtained connecting properties of programs or type systems or rewrite systems with automata. Our goal is to fill in the existing gap and to provide a textbook which presents the basics of tree automata and several variants of tree automata which have been devised for applications in the aforementioned domains. We shall discuss only finite tree automata, and the …
TL;DR: The experimental results show that the state-of-the-art algorithm for obtaining an automaton from a linear temporal logic formula outperforms the previous one, with respect to both the size of the generated automata and computation time.
Abstract: We improve the state-of-the-art algorithm for obtaining an automaton from a linear temporal logic formula. The automaton is intended to be used for model checking, as well as for satisfiability checking. Therefore, the algorithm is mainly concerned with keeping the automaton as small as possible. The experimental results show that our algorithm outperforms the previous one, with respect to both the size of the generated automata and computation time. The testing is performed following a newly developed methodology based on the use of randomly generated formulas.
TL;DR: In contrast to the standard algorithm, which uses the subset construction to explicitly determinize the automaton, the antichain algorithm in this paper keeps the determinization step implicit and computes the least fixed point of a monotone function on the lattice of antichains of state sets.
Abstract: We propose and evaluate a new algorithm for checking the universality of nondeterministic finite automata. In contrast to the standard algorithm, which uses the subset construction to explicitly determinize the automaton, we keep the determinization step implicit. Our algorithm computes the least fixed point of a monotone function on the lattice of antichains of state sets. We evaluate the performance of our algorithm experimentally using the random automaton model recently proposed by Tabakov and Vardi. We show that on the difficult instances of this probabilistic model, the antichain algorithm outperforms the standard one by several orders of magnitude. We also show how variations of the antichain method can be used for solving the language-inclusion problem for nondeterministic finite automata, and the emptiness problem for alternating finite automata.