TL;DR: The majority of ferns in Eurasia grew under warm (subtropical to tropical) conditions in moist environments, including peat-forming swamps, freshwater marshes, riverbanks and understorey vegetation in forests.
TL;DR: After becoming nearly extinct during the Permian, the ferns began a slow recovery during the Triassic as the climate of the earth moderated, but with the rapid expansion of the angiosperms during the Late Cretaceous, they once again became reduced in variety and greatly restricted in distribution.
Abstract: After becoming nearly extinct during the Permian, the ferns began a slow recovery during the Triassic as the climate of the earth moderated. As a result, a considerable number and variety were present and widely distributed during the Jurassic and Early Cretaceous. However, with the rapid expansion of the angiosperms during the Late Cretaceous, the ferns once again became reduced in variety and greatly restricted in distribution. Some of the Mesozoic ferns are rather primitive and obviously are closely related descendants of Paleozoic taxa. Such ferns are assigned mostly to the Marattiaceae, Guaireaceae, Osmundaceae, and Gleicheniaceae. The majority of the Mesozoic ferns, however, are distinctive and appear to have originated during that era. These fossil ferns generally fit into modern orders and families such as the Matoniaceae or the Dipteridaceae. In some cases, it is difficult to clearly distinguish some of the Mesozoic ferns from living genera.
TL;DR: The phytogeographic distribution of Cainozoic ferns is reported based upon a critical re-appraisal of the macrofossil and mesofossil record also taking account of evidence from a few highly diagnostic spores.
Abstract: The phytogeographic distribution of Cainozoic ferns is reported based upon a critical re-appraisal of the macrofossil and mesofossil record also taking account of evidence from a few highly diagnostic spores. Well-documented circum-Arctic Cainozoic floras show ferns (Woodwardia, Onoclea, Osmunda, Coniopteris and to a lesser extentAzolla) distributed around the pole to very high paleolatitudes. Some ferns are shared between the mid-paleolatitudes of North America and Europe as would be predicted from the distributions of other biota. Evidence for the composition of Cainozoic fern floras is minimal in some regions (e.g., Antarctica, Central and South America, Africa, India, South East Asia), so the absence of fern fossils from these areas has no biogeographical significance. Matoniaceae were abundant in the preceding Mesozoic. However, the absence of Cainozoic macrofossils, and the fact that no CainozoicMatonisporites spores areMatonia-like, indicates that Matoniaceae had attained their modern relict distribution by, or very early in, the Cainozoic. The important Mesozoic families Marattiaceae and Dipteridaceae are also not represented by Cainozoic macrofossils. They probably also showed Cainozoic restriction but spores are not sufficiently diagnostic to enable testing of this hypothesis. Other ferns, which were also important in the Mesozoic (e.g., Dicksoniaceae, Gleicheniaceae), have patchy, equivocal, or inadequately published Cainozoic records. The dispersed spore record may provide an opportunity to track Cainozoic Gleicheniaceae but this approach is not without problems. Most well-represented Cainozoic fern families, genera and subgenera show widespread Cainozoic ranges, typically with considerable range extensions over their living relatives, both onto other continents and north and south to higher paleolatitudes. These include Schizaeaceae (Lygodium, Anemia, and the extinctRuffordia), Osmundaceae (Osmunda), Pteridaceae (Acrostichum), Thelypteridaceae (Cyclosorus), Lophosoriaceae (Lophosoria), Cyatheaceae (theCnemidaria/Cyathea decurrens clade) and the heterosporous water fernAzolla (Azollaceae). A few well-represented ferns show Cainozoic distributions similar to those of the present day (e.g.,Salvinia [Salviniaceae] andCeratopteris [Pteridaceae] (the latter by the Neogene and based only on spores]) but even these had slightly broader ranges in the Cainozoic. Some Cainozoic ferns have apparently local distributions, e.g.,Blechnum dentatum (Blechnaceae) in Europe; and others are so far represented at only one or few sites, e.g.,Dennstaedtiopsis (Dennstaedtiaceae),Botrychium (Ophioglossales),Grammitis (Grammitidaceae), andMakotopteris andRumohra (Dryopteridaceae). Cainozoic fossils assigned toDryopteris (and some other dryopteroids) require revision along with those of Thelypteridaceae, the latter having high potential to provide useful paleobiogeographic evidence, at least of theCyclosorus group. Cainozoic records of Hymenophyllaceae and Polypodiaceae are here considered unconfirmed.
TL;DR: Sticherus (Gleicheniaceae) is a pantropical genus of about 95 species, characterized by scaly buds, mostly 1-forked veinlets in the segments, (2–)3–5(–7) sporangia per sorus, pseudodichotomously branched blades with pinnatifid or pinnate ultimate branches, and monolete spores.
Abstract: Sticherus (Gleicheniaceae) is a pantropical genus of about 95 species, characterized by scaly buds, mostly 1-forked veinlets in the segments, (2–)3–5(–7) sporangia per sorus, pseudodichotomously branched blades with pinnatifid or pinnate ultimate branches, and monolete spores. In the Neotropics, we recognize 54 species and three named hybrids. We provide typifications, distributional data, and a key for all species. Nine species are described as new: S. albus , S. antillensis , S. chocoensis , S. fuscus , S. jacha , S. moyobambensis , S. nervatus , S. ovatus , and S. rufus . The following new combinations are proposed: S. boliviensis , S. cubensis , S. decurrens , S. farinosus , S. ferrugineus , S. interjectus , S. lanosus , S . × leonis , S. × pseudobifidus , S. squamosus , and S. × subremotus .
TL;DR: A large-scale phylogenomic analysis using high-quality transcriptome sequencing data covered 69 fern species from 38 families and 11 orders and confirmed that Equisetales is sister to the rest of ferns, and Dennstaedtiaceae is sisters to eupolypods II.
Abstract: Background Ferns, originated about 360 million years ago, are the sister group of seed plants. Despite the remarkable progress in our understanding of fern phylogeny, with conflicting molecular evidence and different morphological interpretations, relationships among major fern lineages remain controversial. Results With the aim to obtain a robust fern phylogeny, we carried out a large-scale phylogenomic analysis using high-quality transcriptome sequencing data, which covered 69 fern species from 38 families and 11 orders. Both coalescent-based and concatenation-based methods were applied to both nucleotide and amino acid sequences in species tree estimation. The resulting topologies are largely congruent with each other, except for the placement of Angiopteris fokiensis, Cheiropleuria bicuspis, Diplaziopsis brunoniana, Matteuccia struthiopteris, Elaphoglossum mcclurei, and Tectaria subpedata. Conclusions Our result confirmed that Equisetales is sister to the rest of ferns, and Dennstaedtiaceae is sister to eupolypods. Moreover, our result strongly supported some relationships different from the current view of fern phylogeny, including that Marattiaceae may be sister to the monophyletic clade of Psilotaceae and Ophioglossaceae; that Gleicheniaceae and Hymenophyllaceae form a monophyletic clade sister to Dipteridaceae; and that Aspleniaceae is sister to the rest of the groups in eupolypods II. These results were interpreted with morphological traits, especially sporangia characters, and a new evolutionary route of sporangial annulus in ferns was suggested. This backbone phylogeny in ferns sets a foundation for further studies in biology and evolution in ferns, and therefore in plants.