TL;DR: In the case of the Dirichlet divisor problem, the number of points of the integer lattice in a planar domain bounded by a piecewise smooth curve has been shown to be upper bounded by the radius of the maximum radius of curvature as mentioned in this paper.
Abstract: The Gauss circle problem and the Dirichlet divisor problem are special cases of the problem of counting the points of the integer lattice in a planar domain bounded by a piecewise smooth curve. In the Bombieri?Iwaniec?Mozzochi exponential sums method we must count the number of pairs of arcs of the boundary curve which can be brought into coincidence by an automorphism of the integer lattice. These coincidences are parametrised by integer points close to certain plane curves, the resonance curves.
This paper sets up an iteration step from a strong hypothesis about integer points close to curves to a bound for the discrepancy, the number of integer points minus the area, as in the latest work on single exponential sums. The Bombieri?Iwaniec?Mozzochi method itself gives bounds for the number of integer points close to a curve in part of the required range, and it can in principle be used iteratively. We use a bound obtained by Swinnerton-Dyer's approximation determinant method. In the discrepancy estimate $O(R^K (\log R)^{\Lambda })$ in terms of the maximum radius of curvature $R$, we reduce $K$ from 2/3 (classical) and 46/73 (paper II in this series) to 131/208. The corresponding exponent in the Dirichlet divisor problem becomes $K/2 = 131/416$.
TL;DR: The first equality in (1.1) is a simple consequence of the fact that the sequence {n}9 1 < n < p − 1, runs through the set of kth power residues (mod/?) exactly k times.
Abstract: The first equality in (1.1) is a simple consequence of the fact that the sequence {n}9 1 < n < p — 1, runs through the set of kth power residues (mod/?) exactly k times. The primary purpose of this paper is to survey the present knowledge on the values of the Gauss sums §(k) and G(x), and to convey some of the principal ideas used in their determinations. We also briefly discuss more general Gauss sums. We begin by making some elementary remarks about the values of Gauss sums. It is easily verified by direct multiplication that, for nonprincipal x>
TL;DR: In this paper, it was shown that two critical circle maps with the same rotation number in a special set are Cワン1+α conjugate for some α>0 provided their successive renormalizations converge together at an exponential rate in the Cワン0 sense.
Abstract: We prove that two C
3 critical circle maps with the same rotation number in a special set ? are C
1+α conjugate for some α>0 provided their successive renormalizations converge together at an exponential rate in the C
0 sense. The set ? has full Lebesgue measure and contains all rotation numbers of bounded type. By contrast, we also give examples of C
∞ critical circle maps with the same rotation number that are not C
1+β conjugate for any β>0. The class of rotation numbers for which such examples exist contains Diophantine numbers.
TL;DR: In this article, a simple variant related to Section 4 in [BW17] leads to the following improvements of Theorem 3 in [ BW17] in [2018] and [2019].
Abstract: This paper is closely related to the recent work [BW17] of the same authors and our purpose is to elaborate more on some of the results and methods from [BW17]. More specifically our goal is two-fold. Firstly, we will indicate how a simple variant related to Section 4 in [BW17] leads to the following improvements of Theorem 3 in [BW17]