TL;DR: The heterogeneity of the mammalian sinoatrial (SA) node is considered in terms of cell morphology, pacemaker activity, action potential configuration and conduction, densities of ionic currents, expression of gap junction proteins, autonomic regulation, and ageing.
Abstract: This article focuses on the regional heterogeneity of the mammalian sinoatrial (SA) node in terms of cell morphology, pacemaker activity, action potential configuration and conduction, densities of ionic currents (i(Na), i(Ca,L), i(to), i(K,r), i(K,s) and i(f)), expression of gap junction proteins (Cx40, Cx43 and Cx45), autonomic regulation, and ageing. Experimental studies on the single SA node cell to the whole animal are reviewed. The heterogeneity is considered in terms of the gradient model of the SA node, in which there is gradual change in the intrinsic properties of SA node cells from periphery to centre, and the alternative mosaic model, in which there is a variable mix of atrial and SA node cells from periphery to centre. The heterogeneity is important for the dependable functioning of the SA node as the pacemaker for the heart, because (i) via multiple mechanisms, it allows the SA node to drive the surrounding atrial muscle without being suppressed electrotonically; (ii) via an action potential duration gradient and a conduction block zone, it promotes antegrade propagation of excitation from the SA node to the right atrium and prevents reentry of excitation; and (iii) via pacemaker shift, it allows pacemaking to continue under diverse pathophysiological circumstances.
TL;DR: This review addressed in this review on cardiac pacemaking in the sinoatrial node topics are isolated pacemaker cells, membrane currents of sino atrial node cells, mechanism of pacemmaking, and regulation of pacemaker currents.
Abstract: Major topics addressed in this review on cardiac pacemaking in the sinoatrial node are; 1) isolated pacemaker cells; 2) membrane currents of sinoatrial node cells; 3) mechanism of pacemaking; 4) regulation of pacemaker currents
TL;DR: It is found that an additional current, if, is activated within the range of voltage where the pacemaker depolarisation occurs: this could be important both in normal pacemaking and in adrenaline-induced acceleration.
Abstract: THE way in which adrenaline acts on the sinoatrial (SA) node to accelerate the heart rate has hitherto been obscure. However, in various other parts of the heart adrenaline increases the slow inward (Ca2+/Na+) current1–4, and voltage-recording experiments have indicated that adrenaline also has this action in the sinus region5–7. In the voltage-clamp experiments reported here, we find that adrenaline does indeed increase the slow inward current in the SA node of the rabbit, but that it also augments the outward current which would tend to decelerate pacemaker depolarisation. We find that an additional current, if, is activated within the range of voltage where the pacemaker depolarisation occurs: this could be important both in normal pacemaking and in adrenaline-induced acceleration.
TL;DR: Functional analysis found that mutant channels respond normally to cAMP but are activated at more negative voltages than are wild-type channels, which mimic those of mild vagal stimulation, and slow the heart rate by decreasing the inward diastolic current.
Abstract: We found that sinus bradycardia in members of a large family was associated with a mutation in the gene coding for the pacemaker HCN4 ion channel. Pacemaker channels of the sinoatrial node generate spontaneous activity and mediate cyclic AMP (cAMP)-dependent autonomic modulation of the heart rate. The mutation associated with bradycardia is located near the cAMP-binding site; functional analysis found that mutant channels respond normally to cAMP but are activated at more negative voltages than are wild-type channels. These changes, which mimic those of mild vagal stimulation, slow the heart rate by decreasing the inward diastolic current. Thus, diminished function of pacemaker channels is linked to familial bradycardia.
TL;DR: Two randomised clinical studies have shown that ivabradine is an effective anti-ischaemic agent that reduces heart rate and improves exercise capacity in patients with stable angina and experimental data indicate a potential role of pure heart rate lowering in other cardiovascular conditions, such as heart failure.
Abstract: Resting heart rate is associated with cardiovascular and all-cause mortality, and the mortality benefit of some cardiovascular drugs seems to be related in part to their heart rate-lowering effects. Since it is difficult to separate the benefit of heart rate lowering from other actions with currently available drugs, a ‘pure’ heart rate-lowering drug would be of great interest in establishing the benefit of heart rate reduction per se. Heart rate is determined by spontaneous electrical pacemaker activity in the sinoatrial node. Cardiac pacemaker cells generate the spontaneous slow diastolic depolarisation that drives the membrane voltage away from a hyperpolarised level towards the threshold level for initiating a subsequent action potential, generating rhythmic action potentials that propagate through the heart and trigger myocardial contraction. The I
f current is an ionic current that determines the slope of the diastolic depolarisation, which in turn controls the heart beating rate. Ivabradine is the first specific heart rate-lowering agent to have completed clinical development for stable angina pectoris. Ivabradine specifically blocks cardiac pacemaker cell f-channels by entering and binding to a site in the channel pore from the intracellular side. Ivabradine is selective for the I
f current and exerts significant inhibition of this current and heart rate reduction at concentrations that do not affect other cardiac ionic currents. This activity translates into specific heart rate reduction, which reduces myocardial oxygen demand and simultaneously improves oxygen supply, by prolonging diastole and thus allowing increased coronary flow and myocardial perfusion. Ivabradine lowers heart rate without any negative inotropic or lusitropic effect, thus preserving ventricular contractility. Ivabradine was shown to reduce resting heart rate without modifying any major electrophysiological parameters not related to heart rate. In patients with left ventricular dysfunction, ivabradine reduced resting heart rate without altering myocardial contractility. Thus, pure heart rate lowering can be achieved in the clinic as a result of specific and selective I
f current inhibition. Two randomised clinical studies have shown that ivabradine is an effective anti-ischaemic agent that reduces heart rate and improves exercise capacity in patients with stable angina. Ivabradine was shown to be superior to placebo in improving exercise tolerance test (ETT) criteria (n = 360) and, in a 4-month, double-blind, controlled study (n = 939), ivabradine 5 and 7.5mg twice daily were shown to be at least as effective as atenolol 50 and 100mg once daily, respectively, in improving total exercise duration and other ETT criteria, and reducing the number of angina attacks. Experimental data indicate a potential role of pure heart rate lowering in other cardiovascular conditions, such as heart failure.