TL;DR: Although Fucus has a grazer—vulnerable stage, it often escapes herbivore control by virtue of spatial and size—related refuges, however; unusually high number of perwinkles can prevent FucUS establishment, even when spatial refugees occur.
Abstract: The mid—zone rocky intertidal community at protected and semiprotected areas in New England is characterized by a few, relatively small—bodied herbivore species. The effects of gastropod herbivores, primarily Littorina littorea, on secondary succession in the community were experimentally investigated. These periwinkle snails preferentially consume early successional, ephemeral algae such as Ulva lactuca L., Enteromorpha spp., and Porphyra spp. If not grazed, these early stages inhibit the appearance of a later successional species, Fucus vesiculous L. The effect of the herbivores on succession is to speed up the early successional sequence by releasing Fucus from inhibition by ephemeral species. Although these herbivores effectively control the ephemeral algae, they are usually unable to regulate the establishment of Fuchs. The periwinkles will readily graze small Fucus germlings (<3—5 cm long), and can prevent their successful establishment on smooth rock surfaces. However, substratum microtopography created by small crevices or pits or barnacles provides spatial refuges for small germlings. These plants quickly grow to a size at which they are less susceptible to periwinkle grazing. Thus although Fucus has a grazer—vulnerable stage, it often escapes herbivore control by virtue of spatial and size—related refuges. These escapes are herbivore—density dependent, however; unusually high number of perwinkles can prevent Fucus establishment, even when spatial refuges occur. Although the periwinkles harm young Fucus, they benefit older Fucus plants by grazing epiphytes from the blades, in lieu of the plant itself. The grazers thereby increase the persistence of individual Fucus and stabilize the community that depends upon Fucus for a habitat. The perwinkles thus play a subtle but important role in the community.
TL;DR: “Optimal” plant sizes predicted by the model closely match the mean observed sizes of plants collected from exposed and protected locations, however, the match between observed and predicted plant sizes occurred not via differential survivorship, but by direct size modification resulting from plant tattering.
Abstract: Hydrodynamic forces generated by breaking waves have been proposed to act as one of the primary physical mechanisms constraining the sizes to which wave-swept intertidal plants can grow. Plants inhabiting intertidal areas are generally small relative to subtidal and terrestrial plants, and within a species, plants on wave-exposed shores are usually smaller than those at wave-protected sites. However, although these relationships have been well documented, there have been no manipulative field experiments demonstrating that wave forces are directly responsible for limiting plant sizes.
In this study, I examined the effects of wave forces on plant sizes in the field by reciprocally transplanting Fucus gardneri (rockweed) individuals between wave-exposed and wave-protected intertidal sites at Fogarty Creek Point, Oregon. Mean sizes of wave-exposed plants transplanted to protected sites increased significantly relative to exposed control transplants. Mean sizes of wave-protected plants transplanted to exposed sites decreased significantly relative to protected control transplants.
These data support but modify an accompanying mathematical model that predicts size-dependent survivorship of Fucus under conditions of high and low wave exposure. This model incorporates the trade-off between higher reproductive capacity and lower probability of survival at larger plant sizes. “Optimal” plant sizes predicted by the model closely match the mean observed sizes of plants collected from exposed and protected locations. However, the match between observed and predicted plant sizes occurred not via differential survivorship, but by direct size modification resulting from plant tattering.
TL;DR: It is shown that the brominating activity of the brown macroalga A. nodosum, which contains a vanadium bromoperoxidase located on the thallus surface, occurs when the plant is exposed to light and not in the dark.
Abstract: (...) We report that the brown seaweeds Laminaria saccharina, Laminaria digitata, Fucus vesiculosis, Pelvetia canaliculata, and Ascophyllum nodosum and the red seaweeds Chondrus crispus and Plocamium hamatum contain bromoperoxidases. The intact plants are able to brominate exogeneous organic compounds when H 2 O 2 and Br − are added to seawater. Further, we show that the brominating activity of the brown macroalga A. nodosum, which contains a vanadium bromoperoxidase located on the thallus surface, occurs when the plant is exposed to light and not in the dark. (...)
TL;DR: In this paper, a large-scale survey of the distribution and occurrence of the genus Fucus was carried out in 1987/88, which revealed a drastic decline in Fusus biomass from between 40 000 and 45 000 t wet wt down to only 2400 t wet Wt, which means a decrease by 94 to 95 %.
Abstract: In the framework of investigations on possible effects of eutrophication on the macrophytobenthos in Kiel Bay (Western Baltic), a large-scale survey of the distribution and occurrence of the genus Fucus was carried out in 1987/88. For large-scale quantitative mapping, underwater television was employed or direct observations from the water surface were made. Species composition and quantitative biomass data were obtained by dredging and SCUBA-diving. Comparison with the results of earlier investigations revealed a drastic decline in Fucus biomass from between 40 000 and 45 000 t wet wt down to only 2400 t wet wt in 1987/88, which means a decrease by 94 to 95 %. Whereas Fucus vesiculosus as well as F. serratus were still frequent at depths below 2 m down to 13 m in the seventies, during our investigation Fucus spp. was not found in water depths greater than 2 m. Possible causes for the observed changes are discussed, and it is concluded that decreased light levels or increased epiphyte growth as a result of eutrophication, and the reduction of substrate for algal growth due to stone fishing and sand deposition, are the main causes for the decline of Fucus spp.